>>17712603This is a thread about ring style retard.
My point is that WWE's in-ring wrestling sucks compared to what you can see anywhere else.
Most people think this is all retarded. They'll also tell you that, when they see clips of other companies, those companies do *the in-ring* better. The mistake you're making is assuming that I'm arguing that it's something they'd be more likely to watch - they won't because they think pro-wrestling is shitty and for retards to begin with.
I watch WWE. It's entertaining, albeit I *personally* find it less so than other companies. Yeah, it draws the most profits but I don't care about that because profits come at my expense as a viewer. But the in-ring action sucks compared to elsewhere. It's tiresome hearing people who have *only* watched WWE insist otherwise. Has nothing to do with "what's most popular." People watching WWE aren't watching primarily for the in-ring action as they would other companies.
You're so desperate to defend this that you're not even getting what I'm saying.
