>>17788988Not that anon, but fren, your perspective is off
>Yet he doesn't bother with star ratings for feuds, promos, character work, et. al. It's just a yearly award. That sends the message that these elements of wrestling are merely a bonus and Those things take time to develop and rely on what came before it. It's ridiculous to give a segment a rating when it then becomes out of context. He also doesn't rate every match, and clearly doesn't take it as seriously as he did when he was younger. His autism has been getting lazy.
>what really matters are the matches.Cuz the rating system was a review meter for tape traders figuring out what things they wanted from Japan when they had to order blind and its a left over from a forgotten erased age. It got over so it continued, but he's copying weasel Dooley on the suggestion from Jim cornette
>But in truth, it all matters. Wrestling is a show with a lot of elements. Rating only the matches would be like judging movies based solely on the special effectsBooker t just said this, yeah. And Dave loves that shit, too. And how hard does he promote and talk about his favorite wrestling, lucha? Almost never.
Your issue is that youre overlaying a tape trading review system with a that doesn't consider things that it was never intended to include.
But hey, there's an empty niche right there. You have autism, go be the segment version of Dave. What segments do we just need to watch and are great going in blind?
