>>18097563>If the title is supposed to prove someone is “the guy,” then the reign needs to reflect that.No, he needs to prove it
>Feeding them midcardersIts one feud, not being fed
>Bret got YokozunaDo you really not know how that ended up?
>They didn’t test those guys by making them wrestle the lower midcard for months, they validated them with real matchups.Jbl is a joke. No one took him seriously then. Bautista was triple hs project and his failure reflected on hhh, so he was protected.
>for monthsOnly a month between ppvs... prove yourself in one, and you're fine
>You keep moving the goalposts. You don't know what that phrase means
>First it's “he has to draw on his own,” then it's “Cena had weak opponents and still made it work.” Literally the same point and the latter is an example.of the former
>bad feuds can hurt a reign?If you suck. Rock lost to hurricane and wasnt hurt. Hbk put over mid career Jeff Hardy clean on raw and wasnt hurt either. If youre the person people want to see, they'll watch anyway, cuz they live and die with you, which is way more important.
>when those feuds flop, the blame shifts to the champ no matter what.Do you not understand what responsibility of the role is? Its the champs job to draw not the other guy
>And acting like “being able to draw with anyone” is the standard ignores that no one, not even Cena or Austin, did it alone. They all had dance partners who mattered.Samartino did, hogan, flair, Austin, rock vsrious others...
You're not serious, are you? They could all prove their worth with someone less than. They didnt still need a bigger star tonestablish them at the top. Not should the top guy need that. Flair never did.
>You don’t elevate someone by strapping a rocket to them and then asking them to swimHave you ever watched wrestling in the last 20 years? That's literally Cena and roman
