>>18238127The Bucks have a lot of great matches, I'm not going to deny that, but they've never really ventured out of their comfort zone, and I don't even mean that in a sense that they did'n't go to WWE.
You could watch a Bucks match ten years and watch one today and the whole production is pretty much the same.
Compare that to the Hardys, for instance, who have seen success in two major promotions and have been responsible for innovations that changed the entire landscape of professional wrestling on at least two separate occassions. They've also updated their style as both singles and tag wrestlers
>But the Bucks were big game changing draws on the indiesyes, and so are the Hardys these days, they without a doubt the hottest ticket at conventions and are a large part of the current TNA rennaissance in terms of drawing crowds.
