>>18274375>Neither was I or OP,No you are. Again the post is saying WWE stories are "baby-brained" while AEW's are "grounded and emotional", which is supposed to be the opposite of "baby brained". Saying something is baby brained is claiming it's stupid, and trying to highlight intelligence. The post isn't saying "AEW's stories have more emotion than WWE's". It isn't saying "AEW stories are more realistic". It is saying one is "baby brained". There is nothing "smarter" about AEW stories, and that is because it is all wrestling and wrestling stories are simple, and best when kept that way. Anyone claiming WWE stories are "baby brained" are trying to cope and say the stories aren't "smart" enough for them. That means they're trying to show their intelligence by what wrestling show they watch, a low IQ thing to measure intelligence by.
