>>18297598anon heres what happened. someone said wwe is extremely simple and lowbrow, and i sarcastically remarked "yeah and aew is a hemingway novel". assuming you're a reader, you know hemingway is not exactly the most profound stuff on earth but you clearly understand the point that was being made. i didnt miss your point, i just no sold it because you're being silly. now, who do you consider "deep" (stupid word btw but you used it first)
