>>18745438Have you ever for one moment considered that you might be incredibly stupid and too far in your own flawed logic to consider that you are in fact very dumb?
>Oh it's coming, just a matter of time>You know you failed as a female singer>You still can't get any real views/engagement from it>That was a huge fail on her partHere's a huge fail from you. Try and comprehend this.
Did it ever cross your mind for one second that your definition of what success is, is not what her definition is? You say she failed, do you know what she was trying to achieve or are you assuming? Does success look like view count, money, fame? Are >>You successful by this metric?
Are local bands that don't even make it to Spotify failures because they don't have record deals?
Do you have a thick ass and happen to be an absurdly sensual woman who posted pictures of their body while they were in WWE somehow a change of character? Of desperation of trying to make it successful? Or is she just sensual.
>Real views>Real engagement>RealWhat is real to you? A number that goes up? A number of anonymous people consuming? Or maybe what's real is the real people she connects with while she does her music. Maybe the real part is when her husband pounds her and she feels like the only star she ever wanted to be. Creating what she wanted, regardless of public opinion.
>That was a huge fail on her partThis is a huge fail on your part, and unless you want to post your body, your music, your fame, your house, your bank account, your status, maybe you should take a moment and consider who is failing here. Unless you want to redefine what your metric for success is, because personally I'd rather succeed in the only ways that matter to me, not someone with their monitor off.
