>>18897304When someone says they "turned on the prequel hate" they are 100% snarky contrarian by choice, willing to settle for lesser because their new toy wasn't as shiny and good as promised - or 'tarded
Prequels were and are still janky, poorly written, directed and paced garbage movies. Only thing that changed is that Disney managed to produce even worse written movies and at best hollow nostalgia milking machines* (sans Andor and half a seasons worth of Mando) So poo poo pants fans turn back to praising prequels and mindlessly defending them like they are on some profound never before discovered notion that there was..,
> hold up your horses pioneer Jimbo, we prospecting some new ground here, there's good parts in the sequels... *gasp* we the first to find this amazing disc- yeah no shit, Columbus, That was discovered years ago. You didn't figure out anything new. That's why people cared enough to despise and talk about the jank in the prequels to begin with, FOR YEARS, because it's cornucopia of compelling ideas hammered out by a retard.
If you'd put your clothes on in the morning but you'd end up wearing your underwear as a bra over your t-shirt, if you technically accomplished the task, you still fundamentally failed the assignment even if your mom pats you in the back and calls it "great", "like poetry" and a "bold move". You still didn't dress up good at the end of the day.
That's what those movies are with almost every scene having some problem that is the equivalent of wearing shoes on your hands, your pants wrong way around etc. Just because Disney dressed up in donkey shit and lesbian poetry doesn't make you any better next to people who dressed up properly that morning.
