>>18968815That's not really the point. Phil's only relevant when he reminds you he's no punk at all, or at least that's what you keep telling me over and over again. Why do some try so hard to prove Phil wrong? He's a hypocrite, he's not punk, look he took Saudi money. Repoman never repo'd a Mazda. The bubble is popping, the fandom is all a lie. The act is over. Phil loves being Phil more than you hate him being Punk anyway. If you were apathetic towards him I'd get it, but you're not. You're a huge fucking fan of his. But you're in that wrestle bubble that even he wants out of. They all do. Mark Callaway wanted out. Now with no matches left we'll discuss their personal politics? I'm not directing this entirely to you obviously, Anon. I'm in whatever fucked up group we'd call ourselves that have cared too much, or not enough, about a wrestler's actual life choices. Hogan comes to mind. But like Hogan, they die and a new character replaces them. But Terry's still dead. I think we should let them die as men and not really worry about their characters so much. Growing too big for that bubble. His name is Mark. His name is Phil. His name was never Punk.
