>>19154376NXT getting a boost of 50K or so viewers cannot be explained by point to 20,000,000+ more households which - once again, because you are retarded and still don't understand - the vast majority of those households are on OTA/antenna and not counted or reported by Nielsen. CW costs a fraction of that TNT/TBS costs, just like QVC, Hallmark and other SHIT channels, and it has limited hours of programming (only 8-10pm on weeknights). NBC has the Today Show, Late Night, etc, CW has none of that.
The story of how you would tell things makes no sense, and makes you sound fucking retarded for believing it. We're supposed to believe that there's 100,000+ households (comprising around 20% of the total NXT audience) who, until late 2024, followed exactly 0 wrestling promotions and either only had broadcast channels on a cable/satellite/MVPD plan, or had a plan that specifically excluded TNT/TBS. Then once NXT magically landed on CW, those 100,000+ households started watching NXT religiously, week in and week out, as if their lives depended on it. Such that NXT dropped in viewership, every single one of these 100k stuck around, because if they didn't, then the numbers don't work out.
Do you seriously not realize how fucking retarded it makes you sound to believe this? It's an Occam's Razor situation, AEW is blowing dick right now because the show fucking sucks. It's doing dogshit numbers everywhere including YouTube for a reason. It's not because a mythical X million households have CW but not TNT/TBS and are pushing them over the top, AEW is just that fucking bad and keeps cratering.
