>>19746731>>19746679I think the broader point is, Dave is ultimately a critic and not a journalist. So that means he's free to have whatever opinion, but it also means any news he breaks should be taken with a grain of salt
>he charges $15 Newspapers charge too. They make the partition of editorial vs. news very clear (or at least they used to)
Dave is both, so you just take it for what it is - paid entertainment
