>>19834959This is exactly why I'm now ignoring any news stories about "(Person A) was mentioned in the Epstein files!", unless it's also explicitly highlighted that the person was also mentioned in the context of committing sex crimes
Jon Stewart recently made fun of this by admitting on the Daily Show that he was legit "mentioned" in the Epstein files
The context? Someone emailed Epstein about getting Stewart to host some TV special, that's all it was