>>19901449not a bad talking point. Is there anything they can do to become relevant again? I think not, they had a chance because Vince was senile and while HHH is making drones angry, I don't think things will get that out of hand.
>A good signing?There are 2, 3 guys that can make a change. Brock isn't one of them since he is an enhancer, but can't be built around. And I don't want to hear about Becky, Seth or AJ Styles (BBAJ is based but won't change the game).
>Cenayes, he is retired, but he was the only draw wrestling has produced in the last 20 years.
>Roman ReignsFunny, this guy could possibly turn some heads around, but he is too much of a bootlicker like Cena seems to be. And he is on his way out, a Cena run is even more possible. So all in all, yes, Punk was their only chance at success and they fumbled. Except...
>Vincent Kennedy McMahonHe would be a massive draw, the biggest character in the history of wrestling coming back, the creator trying to kill his creation... would definitely change the game and generate millions of dimes. But Tony is a massive pussy and would never hire him. "what would the woke sickos say?"
