>>4738082Yes there is, moron. That's how it works.
But please do tell me your art expertise that you don't have you bullshitting retard.
All criticism is objective. Objectivity is contextual; good requires classification - good brushwork, good athleticism, good emoting, good editing. It's not
>hurrr durr good is I like bad is I don't.That's not a metric, it's petulance. Grow a brain, you absolute heckin dumbshit.
Art criticism is debating whether a work constitutes art. Whether it has a concept and achieves it, and whether that concept has any value to the public it is shown for.
Pro wrestling has absolutely no relation so that at all, so you're a moron. But criticism or pro wrestling follows the same logic of critiquing it based on the purposes of the medium: entertainment, athleticism, delivery of clear narrative, adherence to the rules and restrictions of the medium (it being wrestling it is judged as succeeding at being wrestling and not really being something else entirely like a bad stage play or dance routine, in which case that's not what the show is and therefore it is unsuccessful).
This is not complicated. You have to be insanely stupid to not immediately understand basic ideas like criticism and objectivity. That's how you figure out how to exist inherently as a human, fucking hell.
