>>4929080It would be like if I made a twitter account with a decent following, then started posting RAW ratings, but only included the 18-49 (which is like 500k) and then compared them to the full ratings of the previous week, just to make WWE look bad. Most people know there's nothing in this, but there are a good amount of people think these mean something (look at the comments on his posts, it's a wonder these people can get out of bed by themselves)
