>>4948022Yeah, I just read it. Fuck it, here are the key points
>AEW is objectivity good the worst thing you can say about it is that it's "uneven" (I shit you not he says this shit)>All wrestling styles are represented and all promo styles too so you are bound to like one of them which makes it good somehow>Anyone who says anything bad is doing so in bad faith and then like two out of the six pages are dedicated to how AEW doesn't rely on WWE talent and how WWE to AEW guys are NOT traitors>The argument that WWE had no home grown talent in the golden age/it takes years for them to actually work when they do>All the WWE guys are used better in AEW with him citing andrade as one of them despite calling him 50/50 midcarder and the only positive is that he has better matches and a better physique I guess>Article ends with this quote, "You are unable to dislike All Elite Wrestling even on some small, isolated level unless you have literally been brainwashed by Vince McMahon." I can't tell if he's trying to be cute or not his writing style is annoying as ballsIt's not worth the read. It's like he's arguing with the Twitter screenshots posted here rent free without actually responding or citing them
