>>5189804I’m not saying that’s wrong (I’ve never looked). However, when he’s saying post-debut that they are pulling in new, young fans under 35 that WWE is missing, and then it works it’s way out 3 years later that WWE is beating them in that demo, it looks silly. Clearly they’ve lost in that age group as their average viewer is now 49 as opposed to 42.
I can only go with actual data from audited companies, not Dave calling some private company with stake in the numbers to get PPV buys.