>>5234219If these are legit criticism, then you'll accept legit responses without boiling into buzzword spouting rage
>Sporadic Booking decisionsDo you mean matches that are announced out of nowhere? Because that's the only sporadic decision I see in AEW. When it comes to changing a character or building a feud, there's always a build. There are a few instances where they jumped too fast onto something but as a whole, every decision looks like it was taken with weeks of preparation.
>unnecessary signingsI doubt you can call any of the signing unnecesary. I can hate Keith Lee but that doesn't mean it's unnecesary. He has a role to play and fans that want to see him. Is he bringing money with merch or appearances? Then it's not unnecesary. Unless you're talking about the money spent, in which case it's a hollow criticism because you don't know what is Tony's budget or the terms of those contracts.
>Boring ChampionsThis is a matter of opinion, not a legit criticism. I can 99% accurately predict you're saying this just because of Page. But people like Page. He always gets loud pops and sells merch. Is he boring to you? Well, that's bad but that doesn't mean it's boring to me. If you're talking about ratings then you would have to show him dropping ratings consistenly week after week to have a case.
>Gimmick matches damn near EVERY WEEK.I believe a wrestling show is always more exciting if there are plenty of different kind of matches. This isn't an exclusive thing to AEW. Just this week RAW had a texas tornado tag , last week they had two handicap matches
>Inconsistency with storylinesWhich one?
>Too much talent agencyyou mean the wrestlers have to come up with their stuff? That's one of the best things around because then you realize who is an actual talent and who has to be handheld by others. History has taught that the biggest successes in wrestling were always people who made their own characters. Austin, Rock, Brock, Jericho, they all made their own stuff.
