[24 / 5 / 21]
Quoted By: >>5402624 >>5402707 >>5402738 >>5402758 >>5403067 >>5403079 >>5403089 >>5403098 >>5403324 >>5403350 >>5403416 >>5403841 >>5403910 >>5403927 >>5404055
>In today's WOR episode at http://f4wonline.com, Dave addressed a mailbag question that noted that advertisers have historically been reluctant to sponsor AEW shows because advertisers see AEW fans as poor and unlikely to spend money. The question asked whether this reputation is deserved, or just an antiquated view that stubborn ad executives are unwilling to abandon.
>Dave answered that multiple demographic studies have repeatedly found that AEW fan demographics (or "demos") are low-income, and "very homosexual" which he immediately clarified specifically meaning "very, very, Tranny," and overall unlikely to spend money.
>Dave contrasted AEW with other "sports entertainment" demos, noting "WWE has the good demos, hockey has the good demos," and concluding that advertisers apparently believe NASCAR has better demos to advertise to than AEW does, though he conceded AEW demos skew younger than NASCAR.
AEWbros..
>Dave answered that multiple demographic studies have repeatedly found that AEW fan demographics (or "demos") are low-income, and "very homosexual" which he immediately clarified specifically meaning "very, very, Tranny," and overall unlikely to spend money.
>Dave contrasted AEW with other "sports entertainment" demos, noting "WWE has the good demos, hockey has the good demos," and concluding that advertisers apparently believe NASCAR has better demos to advertise to than AEW does, though he conceded AEW demos skew younger than NASCAR.
AEWbros..
