>>6173218I never said its murder. I'm saying, by logic, if someone is pro life, and in Kane's words, everyone has a right to live, then by logic, should he not believe the same for non-fetuses, e.g. children getting life saving operations? As if he isn't, wouldn't that make him a hypocrite? As he does not believe people have the right to live, as he does not believe this person deserves to have a life saving operation unless they have thousands.
I just genuiney don't get it. I feel they should go hand in hand. I just want an answer. Why is a fetus dying an outrage but a child dying because they can't afford an operation not and "Oh well thats just economics" or whatever?
