>>6508262>88-92(KWAB)Hogan did not need to win in 90. That was set up for Hennig and that old fuck got mad.
>93-96Obviously Luger. They killed him at Summerslam 93.
>97-2001Vince. It was pointless and such an overbooked mess. Just let Austin win.
>02-2006Rey. Didn't need it and they could've slotted him in. Should've been Orton.
>07-11Doritos. My god what a terrible pick. They were better off going with fucking Santino. Though in 2011, it made no sense why Cena, Punk or Barrett weren't the last guys.
>12-16This is actually a mess. It's hard to choose.
Sheamus' run failed so bad it got Bryan over.
Cena didn't need to win for Twice in a Lifetime nor did it need to be for a title.
Batista was booed.
LMFAOOOO
And, I actually didn't mind HHH winning. It was well-done. The problem is that he faced the wrong guy. They should've went with Dean vs HHH at Mania.
I have to say, Reigns 2015, because the whole rumble was booked around that mess and it failed so bad that even Rock was booed.
Terrible crop of winners though and this is why you don't see big bumps from the Raw after Rumble anymore.
>17-22Another weird crop.
Orton did not need this and only won because he got his ass beat by Brock. Should've been Brock or Goldberg winning, with the other guy beating Owens for the belt.
Nakamura. In hindsight, lol. He was a "new" guy though it actually worked for the time. I can't think of anyone other than Roman winning here.
Seth and McIntyre. These two were fine, though unfortunately for Drew it came at the worst possible time. I can't think of anyone else who should've won during Seth's Rumble. He was really the only guy they had.
Edgetty. God no. They should've let Drew win it again and get a decent Mania around people.
Brock. Pointless.
The problem with this crop is they didn't amount to much and this was a better time to take a risk on a new guy. All of these people were somewhat established other than Drew and Nak. They didn't need to win.
Overall, Del Rio.
