>>6533451It's impossible for things to get worse with him gone. At least for the first few years.
Even if his replacement is legitimately worse, it'd take said replacement at least five years to grab a tight-enough hold on power to drive the company into the ground as badly as Vince has done.
And we're at the point where WWE's about as unwatchable as any pro-wrestling promotion's ever been. The law of averages alone dictate that for anyone to be worse'd take considerable effort on their part. You could have a bot make booking decisions randomly and it'd be a significant improvement over the current product.
