>>7340773No, I just think killing people and denying them the chance to achieve their own happiness is fundamentally wrong. Stop trying to throw your own guilt over your advocacy for murder back at me.
>>7340759>This isn’t my “guarantee” that’s simple LOGIC. 1+1 IS 2. I don’t just think it is 2, it IS.So you just know that every child born into this scenario will lead a miserable life and never experience any sort of happiness?
>No but I also thinkSo you're admitting that they have the chance to lead happy, successful lives but they should be killed regardless? What happened to "1+1=2"? Suddenly it's not longer a sure thing, now it's just "well they'll probably be miserable". If being miserable and spreading misery to those around you is grounds to be "morally" executed, why aren't you dead?
>they had no choice and had to deal with whatever suffering their parent chose to put them in if abortion was not a choice they wanted to take.No one has a choice in who they're born to. But everyone who is born, will be presented with numerous choices throughout their lives. Someone who isn't given the opportunity to even be born gets zero choices.
>The child becomes a punishment for having sex and both are made to suffer.How can you say that so authoritatively? You say that like it's some objective truth when it's entirely subjective.
>We are a species of that animal that enjoys sexWe are a species that enjoys sex as an incentive to engage in it, and thus reproduce. This is not my subjective view on sex, it is the scientific and objective one. You screeching and projecting your inceldom on me doesn't change that.
>I don’tSo why is it okay to kill them? Why is it okay to rob them of that happiness?
>what I know is that you want an increaseNo, I just don't think murdering people is a solution to people being unhappy.
> we euthanize non-sentient/sapient beingsPretty telling that you're equating poor and underprivileged people to non-sentient/sapient beings.
