>>8024711No reviews of an entertainment medium (inherently subjective, opinion based) are valid metrically, the rates each aspect of whatever the critic is watching factor into the overall score differ wildly. Even in the highest forms of critique an artist, athlete, or performer, has 0 (zero) reason to change. The nebulously qualified people who would pretend to influence the industry, have an audience that is a small subsection of wrestling fans. Most of whom have no idea who you are talking about when you say Meltzer or Cornette. Last time any of this was relevant? The 80s, 90s days of tape trading. Star scale used to cap at 3. Nobody cares or thinks about reviews of ANYTHING, these days, it is much easier to find whatever movie game, match, book, for free. Some people here are pleb brainlets and need to be hit with a shoot worm on the apron with no theatrics.
