>>8186119>One person who's not an active wrestler negotiates an early release less than a year into a three year deal>the agreement says he can work for WWE, but only backstage and not on-air for a year>assume every AEW contract works this way by default>assume this applies to non-negotiated releasesIdiot knows nothing about employment contracts.
>>8186562That's an apples and orange comparison: non-negotiated releases versus negotiated ones. In the first case, employees are entitled to severance pay as set forth in their original contract for the eventuality that the company that has laid them off, but they have to abide by a non-compete period as a condition of receiving severance (they can avoid the non-compete if they waive severance). .In the latter case, however, it's usually the employee that wants out and the company agrees to let them go subject to various conditions that the two parties work out between themselves at that time (they're not in the original contract, but a newly negotiated release agreement).
