>>8329029In terms of showbizz? Sexuality is a much bigger part of feminine charm than masculine charm, and a mediocre female wrestler who's an 11/10 knockout who knows how to flaunt it is definitely a bigger draw than an ugly female Bret Hart. I wouldn't boil that down to being a whore, though.
In terms of making money for yourself in a healthy economy? If you're young and have got the goods, I guess. You'd better plan for the wall and get ready to be lonely in your old age, though. You have a higher chance of dying in a gutter than a housewife.
In terms of sustaining society, which includes the availability of goods and services (wealth) down the line? Definitely not.
The root cause of most of our modern problems is the lack of a feeling of social and financial support that comes from a stable family. That extends to inflation, since that's caused by people who want the government to be the good dads that they were denied. Social media is a scapegoat for problems that have been growing for generations as women abandon their responsibilities as wives and mothers, encouraged by the family courts and feminism (which is to women what communism is to the poor; it's about hating and attacking men, not loving and helping women).
>What about the men?!It's the women who are overwhelmingly leaving the relationships and taking the alimony and child support. It's also the women who chase the bad boys who inevitably beat them half to death. The good men can't shoulder the responsibility for either of these. We have a problem with lack of accountability for women.
