>>8522343>The fact that he has watched way more matches than youYou don't know that. But even if you did how many do you have to watch for your reviews to hold water? Does that mean Dave's old reviews don't count because he didn't watch a certain number of matches yet?
>Knows a lot more than wrestling than youHow do you know? And what do you mean by know more? More history? More about being a wrestler? If someone has more knowledge do their 5 stars mean more than Meltzer's?
>wrestlers respect his ratingThey respect mine too. I recently told Maki Itoh she had a 6 star match and she agreed with me
>And because he made a living out of itSo if I were to get paid I'd immediately have an opinion that means as much as Meltzer's? Jim Cucknette makes a living off his opinion too. Do his stars matter? So does Eric Bitchoff and that fat fuck Conrad. Do their star ratings matter because they're knowledgeable about wrestling and make money from it?
>while you play cock hero in your mom's basement while she is out shoppingI live in the guest room and she pays me weekly to write wrestling reviews.
