>>8560253If I'm being quite honest with you famalam, much more over than he had any "right" to be - and this is coming from a fan.
>not a great technical wrestler, like at all>not a great promo, like at all>not a standout physiqueSo what did he have
>a very unique look / cool hair>good but not amazing in the category of general agility and flippy shit>tons of memorable high spots>attitude era nostalgiaBut you know what the main unspoken quality of Jeff Hardy was that made people happy to see him every time he was on tv?
>he was literally never boringWhen you watch a Jeff Hardy match you can be pretty reasonably assured from the start that you're not in for a 25 minute grapple and rest hold fest. I think this is why he was so popular. He was always interesting and never boring
