>>8611860Couldn't agree more.
Viewers added per segment/quarterlies were always retarded, and if you go back to the Attitude Era you have guys like David Flair being responsible for some of the highest 'viewers added per segment' lists, as if anybody ever tuned in for fucking David Flair kek
The reality is that most wrestling programming (and regular TV programming besides) follows about the same quarterly ratings every single time. The top of the show will always be near the highest, and then it'll be gentle slope downwards with maybe a small updoot or two and then it goes up a little towards the finale.
It's never meant anything and never will mean anything and if you put all of Thurson's Wrestlenomics shits on a giant chart side by side you'd be able to clearly see they're pretty much identical with only little variation.