>>8869062Faggots like this forget the idea of what a booker is supposed to do, which is book with the idea of long term. Hogan was "forced" into spots all the time, but no one is going to remember that shit looking back. They just look at the history and go "Oh man Hogan was a big deal". Same with Taker. His "streak" was padded with a bunch of shitters with only the later matches putting him up against "big" names. It had to become a streak first for it to matter. Modern fans are just marks that think they're smarks.
