>>8970068smark opinions are always just claiming everything wwe does is wrong even though they're the only company that has made money for longer than a couple of years.
they're obsessive about wrestling but understand it the least of anyone. someone on here had a retort about aew storytelling being bad that was along the lines of "anyone who really cares about that has been conditioned by years of wwe" as if fan investment hasn't been the crux of wrestling since its inception. but no, wwe is out of touch and aew does it right because they have multiple "5 star" bangers with absolutely zero heat and a predictable winner every week.
