Explain, without puking on your Cult of Cornette shirt or shitting your John Cena underpants, how Dave Meltzer is "biased."

>durrrr...he has one style of wrestling than he prefers more than an other
Every fucking critic has certain individual preferences: was Roger Ebert "biased" because he liked period drama more than gore films? Dave's personal preferences don't effect his ratings: he routinely gives bloody violent matches 5 stars even though he personally dislikes the style.

>durrr....he takes pictures with certain wrestlers that he's friendly with
do you think film reviewers aren't friends with certain actors? food reviewers aren't friends with certain chefs?

>he's a mark for AEW
He's never been a paid part of their programming, unlike Ariel and Satin for WWE

>durrr...he has private conversations with Tony Khan
he used to have private conversations with Vince and Bischoff and Bill Watts and Jerry Jarrett

>but..but...he just hates WWE, ok???
he openly admits that WWE is the hottest promotion in the world right now

I know this may be hard for you to grasp, but Dave is the only journalist who matters in wrestling, and the only journalist who will ever matter in wrestling. Then. Now. Forever.

So stop seething.