[13 / 1 / 12]
>spend 10 minutes on putting maximum effort put into my post, going point by point and making an inarguable, flawless theorem related to wrestling >first reply: “ok how u know”
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>9038990 so you don't know?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>putting maximum effort put
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>9038990 Tell them how you know and cite evidence. If you actually know what you’re talking about, it shouldn’t be that hard.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>9038990 what are the facts regarding this issue?
Anonymous
UNBEATABLE /PW/ REPLIES:
Anonymous
>>9039070 ok how you know?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>9038990 >For this reason it must be said that nothing is known which does not fall within experience, or (as it is also expressed) which is not felt to be true, which is not given as an inwardly revealed eternal verity, as a sacred object of belief, or whatever other expressions we care to employ. For experience just consists in this, that the content – and the content is spirit – in its inherent nature is substance and so object of consciousness. But this substance, which is spirit, is the development of itself explicitly to what it is inherently and implicitly; and only as this process of reflecting itself into itself is it essentially and in truth spirit. It is inherently the movement which is the process of knowledge – the transforming of that inherent nature into explicitness, of Substance into Subject, of the object of consciousness into the object of self-consciousness, i.e. into an object that is at the same time transcended – in other words, into the notion. This transforming process is a cycle that returns into itself, a cycle that presupposes its beginning, and reaches its beginning only at the end. So far as spirit, then, is of necessity this self-distinction, it appears as a single whole, intuitively apprehended, over against its simple self-consciousness. And since that whole is what is distinguished, it is distinguished into the intuitively apprehended pure notion, Time, and the Content, the inherent, implicit, nature. Substance, qua subject, involves the necessity, at first an inner necessity, to set forth in itself what it inherently is, to show itself to be spirit. The completed expression in objective form is – and is only when completed – at the same time the reflexion of substance, the development of it into the self. Consequently, until and unless spirit inherently completes itself, completes itself as a world-spirit, it cannot reach its completion as self-conscious spirit. Easy.
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>9038990 Why don't you tell us
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
"You tell me" > "so you don't know" > "ok how u know?" > "You tell me"
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>9039070 I love a good we got too cocky for a random jobber
