>>9824806Sting would have been massively over, especially if he had beaten Triple H for the Big Gold Belt. Sting vs. Evolution would have been a money feud since you could play on his history with Flair, have him go over the current big dog in Triple H, and then set him against Orton and/or Batista and have him play a role in Batista's split by getting into his head and winning his respect. Throw Sting vs. Taker in there somewhere and it would've helped stopped the hemorrhaging following WCW's purchase and the Invasion angle.
But that's all hypothetical and counter to how Vince does shit and Triple H's pull at the time. The WCW/ECW guys were booked like jokes. Goldberg should have won the belt after his Rock feud or at least destroyed Triple H at SummerSlam but didn't and despite winning the belt was semi-buried by Paul. Steiner had a shitty match with Paul (both were injured) and WWE was finished with trying to present him as a star. Booker should have won at WM19 but, well, he didn't... and the irony is that Tirple H argued he should win because it would mean that he'd look stronger for when Goldberg beat him but then he kept getting the match put off and beat Goldberg anyway.
So theoretically Sting in WWE in 2003 would have been mega dimes but realistically he would have been fucked given how the rest of the WCW guys were viewed and treated by Vince and Triple H's massive cock swinging ego at the time.
