>>9956935While it's true that Vince Russo was part of the booking team during a time when WWF's viewership was at an all-time high, it's important to consider the wider context of his tenure and the factors that contributed to that success.
Firstly, it's worth noting that Russo was not the sole booker during this time period. He worked alongside other writers and bookers, such as Ed Ferrara and Vince McMahon himself. Additionally, the Attitude Era was characterized by a number of other factors that contributed to its success, such as the emergence of Steve Austin as a superstar, the inclusion of more risqué and controversial content, and a shift towards a more edgy, adult-oriented product.
Furthermore, it's important to consider the quality of the storylines and booking decisions made under Russo's tenure. While there were certainly some memorable moments and storylines during this time, such as the Austin vs. McMahon feud, there were also plenty of examples of nonsensical, convoluted or tasteless booking decisions, such as the infamous "Brawl for All" tournament.
Moreover, when Russo left WWF and moved to WCW, his booking style was unable to replicate the success he had seen in his previous role. In fact, many argue that his booking decisions were a contributing factor to the decline of WCW, which eventually led to its demise.
In conclusion, while it's true that WWF's viewership was high during Russo's time as a booker, it's important to consider the wider context and other factors that contributed to this success, as well as the quality of the booking decisions made under his tenure. Ultimately, it's difficult to argue that Russo was solely responsible for the success of the Attitude Era, and his subsequent failures in WCW suggest that his success was not necessarily sustainable or replicable.
BITCH!
