"You fucking tough guys." You whisper, leaning forward. "You think you'll be able to hold up against them? That they can't trick you or force you to talk? You know if you let ANYTHING slip, it's your fuckin head. So just work with me to make sure we don't fuck anything up."
"Yeah..." He mumbles to himself. "Yeah, you right. If I leak anything, I'm dead."
"Exactly, so wh-"
"Tell me where Anarky's at. Where Calc has him set up."
"Are you fucking joking?" You hiss, not having to fake your genuine annoyance. "That cop is gonna be back any second an-"
"That's the exact reason I need to know if I can trust your ass. If you know where Anarky is at, then you're really with the shits. Just say it."
Fuck. He's smarter than your usual grunt, but not by much. Your brain pulls every filing cabinet drawer open, invisible fingers pour over every file as you slowly lean back in your chair just trying to by enough time to think of something... anything.
>Ask Gotham where Calc is hiding. If he's anywhere in city limits, it'll give you some sort of hint. (Urban Augury, Please include how you want to phrase your question.)>"He's not in the city, it's too hot for him and Calc knows it. Especially with feds around due to Blackgate.">"The Narrows, only place anyone as wanted as Anarky could lie low.">"Water District, it's all industry there which makes it the perfect place to set someone up.">"Tri-Corner, with the private yards down there it was easy to smuggle him in.">"Hiding in plain sight. Old Gotham, right in the lap of the rich where the cops wouldn't nose around.">"The Bowery, it's got the bridges to get into the city and is right next to where most of you Anarky boys are recruited.">"Chinatown, heavy immigrant population means half the people there may not even recognize a guy who ripped off a US Federal Bank and the other half couldn't even tell the police if they did.">Write-In Apology for the delay getting this out and also for the weird formatting, I barely went over the character count so I just split it in half.
>>6338358
>>6337905
Touching on these for a second, I'd welcome any feedback from people who read but didn't vote. Especially if there was something that held you back from voting; like the options were a little too vague or you didn't want to risk proposing an incorrect answer, etc. I'd just like to know so maybe I can try and counteract that a bit. 