>>5946373>>5946379I thought about the semiotics very carefully and consulted
https://cari.institute/aesthetics(recommend this website, it is fascinating).
The immediate temptation is to reposition along some hierarchial value axis of conspicuous consumption, eg opposite of BURGERPUNK some sort of gastro chic bourgeois dining aesthetic etc but this is actually incorrect, because it is still a form of consumption.
So think like this, if BURGERPUNK is about
-ingesting, eating, consuming
-infrastructure of convenience, drive-thru, fast turnover, QSR (quick service restaurant) industry etc
-modernity, anthropogenic reshaped urban environment
The antithesis is not just "upscale / hipster restaurant style luxury consumption" It is probably closer to something like those eremitic penitent desert prophets praying on a pillar / anorexic saintess living in seclusion immured in a cave denying themselves food lol in the era of St Jerome, Macarius of Egypt or Augustine etc.
So MONKPUNK or HERMITPUNK??
Alternatively, if you are unwilling to jettison the consumption angle, something that emphasises great difficulty, inconvenience / toxicity of consumption, like those Bear Grylls desert survivalist videos of him squeezing fluids and dung water from rotting camel bladders and drinking them to slake his thirst. Something along these lines for an alternative to BURGERPUNK
