Quoted By:
CONT
The typical Goblin verbal response when presented with a opportunity to explore their Rare Sexuality, or with any opinion or action deemed "weak", is to use slurs in Common, the most usual and unthinking being "faggit," "hoemoegae," and with Brightborn m->f martial transvestitism in particular, "gae-shamurai" and "moanen roenen."
Who else shares this violent impulse of homomisia? Hyperheteros! And with the same results, history reflecting fact!
By refusing to entertain Rare Sexuality even conceptually, the Goblins have rejected imagination and invention, and thus have not progressed beyond stoneworking in terms of technology 1 and cave painting in terms of language, art and culture 2. Likewise, what significant intentions have hyperheteros made except in pursuit of war or homomisic gaynocide? The great minds of all races were Rare Sexed either openly or in secret; this is beyond all serious dispute 3.
If a Hyperhetero of a sentient race will not change what they are pleased to call their mind, they are then lower than Goblins, who are incapable of changing their nature 4.
To <span class="mu-i">embrace</span> change, to <span class="mu-i">choose</span> change, to change <span class="mu-i">oneself</span>, one's Nature, even or especially by force, is the only way to advance culture, yielding only advantage: when the Fourth Eye is opened, the Third is opened; One's Temple gains Light as one's fundament is fullfilled.
To refuse the choice, to even reject it, is the weak futile deathcry of the heteronormative on the wrong side of history, Goblins in but name and shape.
>Jjaq Çhiq
>Written from ll Seltue Alalme The Sweaty Elms
1: The Dwarven Initiative Concerning Slandery desires that it be put to record that it takes strong exception to such remarks.
2:The Barbarian Illiterati of Touchstone Moot has delivered a brace of bloodied implements to the Apology publisher's personal quarters at speed when the Apology was read to them and explained.
3: Disputed seriously.- Editor
4: Rare Sex Apologists are famously dubious when questions involving Intelligent Will and Nature arise.
