>>5952862>The wording is a bit wonky but I assume you mean "is (a OR b) true?" here, or equivalently "is at least one statement of the set [a, b] true?I probably should have phrased it better, but at that second I was in a bit of a rush at the time (as you can see from my fuckup of "is".
The intended form was as I mentioned in
>>5952610 .
But to explain it better, I was trying to make my question an XNOR gate like in Pic related that is modified by
>Prior roll results take precedence over later roll resultsand the roll of [YES] on Enemies of the Emperor so the [False, False] = True was an impossible result. Thus, the Doll could only be related to only the Godlight group or only to a different group (A [NO] result), or it could potentially be related to at least two separate groups (A [YES] Result).
This overall telling if Enemies in Enemies of the Emperor referred to multiple individuals organized under one banner against the Emperor, or Enemies referred to multiple separate organized groups.
As I said, I pulled some FUCKERY with that roll.
