>>6203715I dunno, I think quests can do that without being forced to. I'm not sure if we need "threads" so much as maybe QM-determined "sections" or "arcs" or whatnot that people can click between, all hosted on one central page.
>>6203712>>6203659Also, I'd like to +1 the reactions concept, either in addition to or instead of proper ratings. I imagine they'd be like Discord, where you can pick from a set number of emojis/icons to append to either individual updates or the quest itself (see picrel for how Sufficient Velocity does it). Might help give a rough gauge of engagement without being stressful or encouraging too much comparison.
