Quoted By:
This [INTERROGATION] vote will also have one more additional section you can vote in. Because in an interrogation sometimes the best way to get a little is to give a little. This determines how much information about the case that Mark will willingly divulge to the perp he is interviewing, all within reason of course, don't worry about a vote for transparency leading to a situation where Mark name drops a witness or mentions case critical information. He's still a trained officer after all.
Reply to this with your vote as well:
[Give and Take]
>Lay it all out, you have a someone ready to turn on Gorchakov already and you've personally seen some of the dirt he's involved with.
>Bits and pieces, be vague. Imply evidence but give no hard answers on anything that would be risky getting out.
>Lock and key, only say what is absolutely necessary and nothing else. You can't be entirely sure it won't make it's way back to Gorchakov.
>Only lies, give him whatever you think he needs to hear. Whatever you think can give you the edge in getting Kent to flip has to be used.
>Write-in
