Quoted By:
This is not a 1:1 analogy. It's "if you were," not "this is literally what you're doing right now." I believe that you've been voting in good faith according to your own principles, which I see nothing wrong with: I just think my expectations have been miscommunicated. So let me communicate them: we are both telling a story and playing a game together. The story matters more than the game, but if you don't play the game at all, the story gets much worse (plus harder to write). If you do play the game, you'll probably have more fun, and I'll definitely have more fun. So please take voting seriously. You don't have to take it optimally-- I mostly don't care whether you guys play optimally-- but you should treat it as though it matters, because it does, even if it's not in flashy obvious TPK ways. Also, because it matters to me, and I put a lot of time into designing vote slates. That's pretty much it.
As an aside, it remains extremely funny that the two most consistent critiques of DQR throughout the literal years are that 1. it's too grueling, depressing, and punishing; obscure choices from years ago are brought back around just to beat Charlotte down with; no progress ever gets made and 2. it's too easy, nothing matters, and Charlotte wins too much. Bathicbros...
>I'd really like to know what the other anons think.
I would too, for what it's worth!
