>>5493567 >>5493567 >>5493567 >>5493567 >>5493567 >>5493567 >>5493567 >>5493567 >>5493567 >>5493567 >>5493567 >>5493567 >>5493567 >>5493567 >>5493567 >>5493567 Okay, we bitch about this every thread.
Let's DO something about it this time.
Let's update the "questionably useful links"
>Archiving guide:Good job, whoever wrote this section. Gold Star!
>qtg discordI am personally neutral about including this, but I am in the skirmish discord, so I say include both or neither.
>pastebin>may not still be active>Badly in need of renovation.Why are we still posting it? I think we should start a separate thread where we dissect each link and piece of advice one by one and come to a consensus on what stays and what goes and what gets added, that way we have a "welcome to /qst/" guide that we aren't embarrassed to show newcomers. Newcomers who could wind up being enthusiastic players and/or productive QMs if we just put in a little more effort.
>Archive of quest reviews: pastebin / QuestReviewsArchiveDoesn't seem particularly useful to shove this in people's face every /qtg/, if /qtg/ is supposed to be an identifiable welcome mat and active discussion place for the board. I've never personally visited the link until now and it wasn't good. Here are some gems, literally the first two pages I click on, I scroll down and see this:
>Recommendations>....It’s all shit all the way down regardless. Why did I even make this review?Next one:
>WHO WOULD I RECOMMEND THIS TO?>No one....Awesome. Can we just drop that link entirely? /Who/ is gaining /what/ from that "resource"? And not just hypothetically. Has anyone found that resource useful, other than the authors of the reviews and the QMs who got reviewed? Anyone? Maybe we can include it in the new/updated pastebin, but I believe that could be a conversation for a separate thread solely focused on this issue, as I predict it may derail the /qtg/ from serving its purpose as a general.
>Just start the thread already, faggotShould I?
