>>5232235He's got a bit of several generals in him.
For recruitment and force gathering, he's McClellan. More is never enough, and too many is just right.
>"I will not move my army until I am absolutely ready."When it comes to supplying them, he is Eisenhower. To run out of fuel, spare parts, and ammunition is a sin.
>“The war has been variously termed a war of production and a war of machines. Whatever else it is, so far as the United States is concerned, it is a war of logistics.”When it comes to expending them, he can be Zhukov, willing to pay the high price for victory.
>"If we come to a minefield, our infantry attacks exactly as it were not there" (unlike other legions, even our Auxilia will know no fear thanks to cybernetics and combat servitors! And we will likely want a LOT of Auxilia.)
When it comes to overall strategy, he is Kurtis Lemay or Harris
>"if you are going to use military force, then you ought to use overwhelming military force. Use too much and deliberately use too much...">"If you kill enough of them, they stop fighting."We can always rebuild what we bomb
And when it comes to naval, he absolutely is Ernst King.
>"The war has been variously termed a war of production and a war of machines. Whatever else it is, so far as the United States is concerned, it is a war of logistics">"Calculating risks does not mean taking a gamble. It is more than figuring the odds. It is not reducible to a formula. It is the analysis of all factors which collectively indicate whether or not the consequences to ourselves will be more than compensated for by the damage to the enemy or interference with his plans. Correct calculation of risks, by orderly reasoning, is the responsibility of every naval officer who participates in combat, and many who do not." 