>>5256570I mean, I could try to write more but you mention wanting write-ins to be short and sweet so finding the balance is difficult. It's also why I ask you if you ever want some clarification or additional elaboration for it to be a viable option, otherwise silence usually indicates its okay so it's kinda hard to make changes when its like, right for the time of the vote. So I'm caught in a predicament.
I'm thinking maybe a good compromise is making a
>Short-green text write inand then following it up with a much longer elaboration post? So what you see on your screen is an easy greentext but you'll have a more detailed post to refer to. I'm mostly irked that it's written as the lazy option rather than the fluff option because I am definitely willing to write more on it.
Tbh I like to think Mathematics and Computive-Logic are likely a preferred form of speech for many techpriests, rather than the archaic human tongue. Maybe acts as a form of legal language too. What is law, after all, but a series of protocols. A program.
In any case, I'm quite I'm fine with any of the three pre-set options. I just wanted to be able to disprove, with the addition of the blessed mathematics and the equations of war, those who insist on why other alternatives were not taken.
