Quoted By:
<span class="mu-b">”Radjo- <span class="mu-i">why</span> should she be with you? There's no foundation of mutual love. You don't <span class="mu-i">give</span> her anything worthy of her love. The Hegemony has many, many millions of men who will <span class="mu-i">never ever fuck</span>. These men are losers. They have no ambitions, no skills, no status; nothing. Do you know what kind of jobs these men have? They live in tiny apartments, they are given simulation software to while away their years. They are all given tiny, easy tasks- work with a machine or undergo a new education software. It is never their feedback that is used; these are idiot testers, and these are the idiots. But that's the truth Radjo- do you think any of these men have some amazing, spectacular personality under their lack of status? Do you think they are failures at life in spite of their amazing character underneath? No, Radjo. They are failures because of their terrible personalities. Selfish, lazy, stupid- failed males. Is isn't about what they can provide, but the fact they <span class="mu-i">can't</span> provide at all is proof that they are worth a female's time. They aren't men, who overcome the odds, they are boys, eternally immature. If they can't work hard to achieve anything, if they can't improve their own bodies, if they can't cultivate social connections; then how could you possible expect them to be able to work hard at a relationship? To raise healthy babies? To keep their woman safe and protected in a social group that she is biologically hard wired to <span class="mu-i">need</span>. How can a man claim to be a great partner and deserving of love, unconditionally, when he can't even fix his own life?”</span>
You haven't even been angry since she started talking. You made her voice too much like Kima's. It's too much, you can't take this.
<span class="mu-b">”Despite the Hegemony's firm dedication to monogamy, our society allows polygamy. Wouldn't this be a contradiction? It is- but women will always have an easier time reproducing. This is true in societies with free female selection and ones without- and everything in between. Women have inherent value. With them, the population continues forward. If two tribes fight, the men of one tribe will kill the men and take the women of the other; but the same number of babies will be born next year as if the two tribes never fought. That's how things work. So why would a woman go with one of these <span class="mu-i">loser</span> men if they can share a man with another woman who can actually provides her with the status, resources, and safety she needs? It's not what she wants, but it is easier and safer to just convince herself to live with it then risk everything on some random, useless, worthless man.”</span>
