Quoted By:
As you decide to implement stricter moderation on boards affected by /pol/ influence, you encounter resistance from the /pol/ moderators. They see your actions as a potential threat to the websites culture and express their concerns.
The response:
Your decision to implement stricter moderation is met with a mixed reception. While many users from the affected boards appreciate the efforts to preserve their culture's and lower the amount of /pol/ related shitposting, the /pol/ moderators are vocal in their opposition. They view the new moderation measures as an encroachment on their board’s tradition of free expression and open discourse.
The /pol/ moderators, without warning you, express their concerns through a dedicated sticky thread on their board, where they argue that strict moderation undermines the very essence of 4chan's commitment to "free speech", and feel like their board is being unfairly targeted. They think that these measures might set a precedent for more stringent control over content and discussions across the platform. And it seems like some of the community is starting to agree with them and are making fun of you. How do you deal with this?
>Talk with the /pol/ moderators to find some kind of middle ground
>Ignore them and maintain the more stricter moderation on off-topic posts and other /pol/ related content.
>Seek community feedback
>Fire the /pol/ moderators and replace them
