>>5881029>>5864447>>5882737>NAPOLEONOn the theme of the false depiction of national heroes, Ridley Scott decided to combine that Assassins Creed Egypt and Assassins Creed Guillotine and made the Napoleon film, I have watched it, ignore the critics this film is quite funny lol. It slows down a bit in the middle and is riddled with inaccuracies like that bit where Napoleon shoots a Mubarizun with a cannon and blows up the pyramids like ISIS blowing up those buddha statues in Afghanistan but then Joaquin Phoenix the most famous and well-known French actor from America has a sort of thoughtful Ozymandias fall of empires moment, he cracks open a golden Egyptian sarcophagus and contemplates with deep historical reverence the ancient withered dessicated mummified face inside; it is Joe Biden. I think the critics don't want to promote this film because it is literally promoting insurrection there are numerous scenes where citizens storm these beautiful Baroque French palaces and do a Jan 6 and I do believe there might be a lot of elections this year.
If nothing else, you need to see this film just for the hilarious depiction of how English director Ridley Scott imagines French people perform lovemaking (it is very vigorous, pneumatic, brief). Also the film is visually beautiful it has CANDLELIGHT, CANNONS, CAVALRY SABRES and of course CORSETS just mountains of heaving bosoms, BATTLES AND BOSOMS they heave a lot, what more do you want?
Here is what Ridley Scott said to the historians:
Scott dismissed criticisms of the film's historical inaccuracies. "Napoleon dies then, ten years later, someone writes a book. Then someone takes that book and writes another, and so, 400 (???) years later, there's a lot of imagination (in history books). When I have issues with historians, I ask: 'Excuse me, mate, were you there? No? Well, shut the fuck up then.'" Scott also declared, responding to French critics, that "the French don't even like themselves".
