>>5272418I consider [This may be risky considering the circumstances] to be: "12.5% chance of failing and getting punished rightly for pushing our luck too far", not "Pass the DC but you die and fail anyway." because that would be a massive dick move by the QM, who I don't regard as dumb enough to do something like that.
>You hold when the odds are in your favor, and right now they are not in our favor.If I've somehow fucked up the simple act of calculating the likelihood of getting the same failing result in three 50/50 rolls, then go ahead and call me a retard. If not, the odds are 87.5% in our favour, unlike what you claim them to be.
>no matter what you manage to roll bar a nat100>you're greedy for a +1 HP regen buffNow you're literally just inventing things. Go fuck yourself.
