AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
You recall the list of positions the president-elect offered you, quickly scribbling them down on the whiteboard by the desk in your home office. Which one calls to you the most?>Secretary of the Interior. Our national parks are the best in the world for a reason. I know that the Rocky Mountain National Park is the most beautiful place you can find only a stone’s throw away from Denver and I would hate to see anybody ruin that or any of our nation’s pristine nature. >Secretary of Agriculture. My grandparents owned a ranch in Utah and I was regularly sent there during the summer as a child. When they passed, God bless their souls, my parents gave the ranch to me. I managed it for 13 years before selling it once I entered politics, and I did a fine job at it too. >Secretary of Commerce. The president-elect ran on a progressive campaign focused on social issues but fiscally, he’s a little more moderate. Having someone like me in this position would align with his administration quite well. I’ve never been a part of foreign trade, but my family has cut out a little corner for ourselves in America’s southwestern economy and they taught me all there is to know. >Secretary of Labor. I like to consider myself pro-labor. I’ve passed a few work safety regulations and during my time as mayor, the minimum wage in Denver was raised by $4. Not only that, but the number of employed citizens with unions went up by 2.2%. I imagine this would play nicely when getting confirmed by a democrat majority congress. >Secretary of Housing and Urban Development. While I have not executed any major reform, the city of Denver and Colorado as a whole has mostly maintained a steady housing market (well, aside from this year’s financial crisis) and adequate infrastructure during my tenures. The only major accomplishment I can take partial credit for in this category is the funding and construction of the Invesco Field stadium. Go Broncos!>Secretary of Transportation. I can’t say I’ve done much notable transportation reform. I’ve signed off on some road construction and that would most likely be the lion’s share of my job here as well. Boring but easy, probably. >Secretary of Energy. I’ve passed only a few reforms, and each one was a compromise. Slowly transition to clean, American energy without raising people’s bills or losing them their job. We’ve made progress, but only a moderate amount. Maybe I could make more if I picked this position. >Secretary of Education. Our children are our future. During my time in the Colorado lower chamber, I’ve always guaranteed our school system gets the funding and resources they need to thrive. I will continue to do so if I choose this position. >Secretary of Veterans Affairs. I’ve never served in the military, but that’s not a requirement. I’ve been hoping to raise our veteran’s pensions for a few years, too. (2/2)
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6203035 >Secretary of Energy. I’ve passed only a few reforms, and each one was a compromise. Slowly transition to clean, American energy without raising people’s bills or losing them their job. We’ve made progress, but only a moderate amount. Maybe I could make more if I picked this position. We shall be nuclear energy's strongest soldier
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6203031 >Secretary of Housing and Urban Development. While I have not executed any major reform, the city of Denver and Colorado as a whole has mostly maintained a steady housing market (well, aside from this year’s financial crisis) and adequate infrastructure during my tenures. The only major accomplishment I can take partial credit for in this category is the funding and construction of the Invesco Field stadium. Go Broncos! Total Bronco Victory
Anonymous
>>6203035 >Secretary of the Interior. Our national parks are the best in the world for a reason. I know that the Rocky Mountain National Park is the most beautiful place you can find only a stone’s throw away from Denver and I would hate to see anybody This seems incredibly random and funny as the post held by the survivor
Bro went from making sure Yosemite was watering the flowers properly to President
Anonymous
>>6203035 >Secretary of the Interior. Our national parks are the best in the world for a reason. I know that the Rocky Mountain National Park is the most beautiful place you can find only a stone’s throw away from Denver and I would hate to see anybody ruin that or any of our nation’s pristine nature. We were off camping when the nukes dropped...
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6203035 >Secretary of Transportation. I can’t say I’ve done much notable transportation reform. I’ve signed off on some road construction and that would most likely be the lion’s share of my job here as well. Boring but easy, probably. The country might be about to go to hell in a handbasket but Amtrak will always run, uh, not on time.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6203077 >>6203078 >"Mr. President I have those firsthand reports you asked f- wait where is everyone?" Anonymous
Listen guys as much as I like parks, I feel like we should get something that would give us the barest of uh, you know, actual skills.
Anonymous
>>6203095 Depending on the nature of this coming emergency, knowing about the environment might be pretty useful. Why don't you vote though?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6203107 I already voted.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6203077 >Secretary of the Interior This covers the Native Reservations. I want to get all Shadowrunny here.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6203035 >>Secretary of the Interior. Our national parks are the best in the world for a reason. I know that the Rocky Mountain National Park is the most beautiful place you can find only a stone’s throw away from Denver and I would hate to see anybody ruin that or any of our nation’s pristine nature. The parks shall run on time, Mr. President.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6203035 >Secretary of Agriculture. My grandparents owned a ranch in Utah and I was regularly sent there during the summer as a child. When they passed, God bless their souls, my parents gave the ranch to me. I managed it for 13 years before selling it once I entered politics, and I did a fine job at it too. Seems fitting.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6203035 >Secretary of the Interior. Our national parks are the best in the world for a reason. I know that the Rocky Mountain National Park is the most beautiful place you can find only a stone’s throw away from Denver and I would hate to see anybody ruin that or any of our nation’s pristine nature. Unlike many other quest-anons, I sometimes find catastrophic MC failure to be amusing
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6203035 >Secretary of the Interior. Our national parks are the best in the world for a reason. I know that the Rocky Mountain National Park is the most beautiful place you can find only a stone’s throw away from Denver and I would hate to see anybody ruin that or any of our nation’s pristine nature. Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6203035 >Secretary of Energy. I’ve passed only a few reforms, and each one was a compromise. Slowly transition to clean, American energy without raising people’s bills or losing them their job. We’ve made progress, but only a moderate amount. Maybe I could make more if I picked this position. I feel like people forget that the secretary of energy is also the person in charge of the nuclear stockpile, second only to the president
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6203035 >Secretary of Veterans Affairs. I’ve never served in the military, but that’s not a requirement. I’ve been hoping to raise our veteran’s pensions for a few years, too. Military secrets.
Anonymous
>¡ENERGIA! Although Interior sounds fun too, especially if they're actually in charge of Rezes.
Anonymous
>>6203180 >The Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA), also known as Indian Affairs (IA),[2] is a United States federal agency within the Department of the Interior. It is responsible for implementing federal laws and policies related to Native Americans and Alaska Natives, and administering and managing over 55,700,000 acres (225,000 km2) of reservations held in trust by the U.S. federal government for indigenous tribes. It renders services to roughly 2 million indigenous Americans across 574 federally recognized tribes. Anonymous
>>6203264 inb4 designated survivor is first american-indian president (proper native american not 'indian american' baka)
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6203035 >>Secretary of Agriculture. My grandparents owned a ranch in Utah and I was regularly sent there during the summer as a child. When they passed, God bless their souls, my parents gave the ranch to me. I managed it for 13 years before selling it once I entered politics, and I did a fine job at it too. >Secretary of Energy. I’ve passed only a few reforms, and each one was a compromise. Slowly transition to clean, American energy without raising people’s bills or losing them their job. We’ve made progress, but only a moderate amount. Maybe I could make more if I picked this position. Its a tie between these 2 for me.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>Secretary of the Interior. Our national parks are the best in the world for a reason. I know that the Rocky Mountain National Park is the most beautiful place you can find only a stone’s throw away from Denver and I would hate to see anybody ruin that or any of our nation’s pristine nature. We'll get the skinwalker and cryptid votes.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6203035 >Secretary of Labor. I like to consider myself pro-labor. I’ve passed a few work safety regulations and during my time as mayor, the minimum wage in Denver was raised by $4. Not only that, but the number of employed citizens with unions went up by 2.2%. I imagine this would play nicely when getting confirmed by a democrat majority congress. Looking out for the average joe.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6203404 Allying with the Indiginos faction?
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
Interior: 7
Energy: 3
Agriculture: 2
Labor: 1
Housing and Urban Development: 1
Transportation: 1
Veterans Affairs: 1
Locking Secretary of the Interior in.
>>6203404 You’re white. Here’s your official portrait, taken on the day of your swearing in.
Anonymous
>>6203580 Look at this fine gentlemen, he speaks for Bigfeet
Anonymous
>>6203580 Let's go full John Brown then . Appoint a John Tecumseh Jones type to lead the BIA.
Anonymous
>>6203580 >Aspen Nominative determinism...
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
Quoted By:
You decided that you would join the president-elect’s cabinet pretty quickly, but choosing which specific position to take is another choice entirely. One that is eating up a lot of your night. “Commerce? No, no…not education, either…” Slowly, one after the other, you cross the titles off on your whiteboard. There are just so many factors to consider, and you could feel a slight calling towards most of them. It took hours for you to finally figure out which callings were pulling on you harder than the others, but even then, by the time you become too tired to continue any more, there is still three options left. Three really, really good options. [NOVEMBER 6 2008] You wake up just a little later than usual to the smell of your wife cooking something up down the hall. You peer over at the clock on your nightstand. 8:08. “Umph…” You climb out of bed and stumble down the hall towards the kitchen, but not before stopping by your office to take a look at the progress you made on your decision making. Yep. It was still just thr- “Hmh…wait…” You didn’t cross out agriculture or energy yet, did you? No, this must’ve been Meredith. You stumble back into the hallway and follow the smell of cooked chicken. “Hey, honey.” A quick kiss is delivered before you wrap your arms around her waist, hugging her from behind with your chin resting on her shoulder. “What’s for breakfast?” “Your favorite, of course.” “Chicken tortilla soup? Oh, you shouldn’t have…” You plant a barrage of kisses on Meredith’s cheek, coaxing a fit of giggles out of her before you walk off to grab a cup of coffee. Thankfully she already had a pot brewing. “Was that you? In my office?” “That it was.” She gives you a subtle smirk as she admits it. “I see.” You eventually sit down with your black cup of coffee and a nice, warm bowl of chicken tortilla soup. You slide your reading glasses on and crack open today’s newspaper. You’re flashed with a tabloid headline. COMRADE PRESIDENT: IS BARRETT LARSON A SOCIALIST?! “Hah.” It’s hardly a story, but it can be funny to read. You take turns between sipping on your bitter cup of Joe and swallowing spoonfuls of thick and savory soup while reading through the latest news in Denver and opinion articles. Once you finish your breakfast, you return the dishes to the sink and toss the newspaper in the trash. “Well, Meredith…Interior it is, then.” [JANUARY 20 2009] You had been spending the last half a week being interviewed by the senate and listening to them deliberate. It may not have been as much as some of the other, more controversial nominees for the president’s cabinet, and you may have been generally considered a snoozer, but it was still more attention than you had expected. Eventually, on the same day that the president is sworn in and another snoozer secretary is confirmed by the senate, you are also confirmed with a vote of 57-41. (1/2)
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
“I, Aspen James Foster, will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.” Congratulations. You are now the 50th United States Secretary of the Interior. Clapping, shaking of hands, patting of backs, etc. You make a hasty retreat from the floor of the senate and have the Secret Service drive you to your new office. Meredith has been taking care of the move to DC, and you’ll be seeing her in the afternoon. But for now, once you’ve settled into your office, you need to make a decision. What do you hope to achieve with the following four years in your new job?>Write-in and roll a 1d20. Any extreme or uncharacteristic goals will either be modified or discarded. (2/2)
Anonymous
Rolled 8 (1d20) >>6203650 Shit I don't know what the Interior guy entails specifically.
>expand firewatch and fire prevention services nationwide Sounds like something easy that sounds good on paper to regular citizens. No one wants their local national parks to explode, right?
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
Quoted By:
>>6203581 If nobody else will advocate for Bigfoot suffrage, you will.
>>6203590 You can certainly choose who to appoint to the BIA if you’d like. You definitely won’t be raiding a military arsenal, though.
>>6203599 Damn, you’re right. I didn’t notice that.
Anonymous
Rolled 18 (1d20) >>6203650 >Look into any other areas of the US and it's territories that deserve to be made into new National Parks. If we find something worthwhile try to get the ball rolling. Anonymous
Rolled 1 (1d20) >>6203650 Hmm, how about:
>Do a tour of the various reservations, to meet with the amerindian leaders, see how they live and what can be done to help them. I admit I have little knowledge on the Department of the Interior so lmk if this isn't feasible.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6203725 >"The white man should leave." Oof.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6203662 I support this. Stuff like responsible brush clearance etc. Smoky the Bear shit sounds nice and uncontroversial.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6203725 Yea the Casino joke didn’t go down well
Anonymous
>Establish a collective title system for Native land, inspired by the Bolivian and Australian systems.
Anonymous
>>6203736 In the words of the Prophet Kodak Black (PBUH), "what dat mean?"
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Rolled 14 (1d20) >>6203736 Forgot the roll
Anonymous
>>6203737 In Australia, Abo tribes can own land collectively as like a tribe instead of it merely being individual title based. I’m not schooled in the American reservation system but I thought that’s how that worked too. Don’t the tribes own the land?
Anonymous
>>6203741 The one time I talked to the Navajo, my understanding was that they don't pay property taxes for their homes/land & they inherit directly from their family without having to worry about mortgages or any jewry like that. I'm not particularly knowledgeable on it though. Do all the Abos live in the interior of the country away from any worthwhile coastal areas?
Anonymous
>>6203744 Most of the better coastal areas have been highly populated by European populations for a while, but there are patches of coastal Abo land too is my understanding. So not all, certainly.
Anonymous
Rolled 8 (1d20) >>6203650 >Promote public awareness and appreciation of our nation's parks and reserves It's time to get those kids out of the city and into nature. Plus, this probably cost the least out of the other options and may give us the clearest measure of success, since a good promotion campaign would result in visible increase in visitors number, i.e. green line goes up.
Anonymous
Rolled 17 (1d20) >>6203650 >Dedicate resources to managing, curtailing, and removal of invasive pest species. Like the things that ruin soil and destroy trees by the thousands. Something must be done about them!
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6203757 An important issue that nobody care about! +!
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Rolled 18 (1d20) >>6203757 >RESTORE THE AMERICAN CHESTNUT DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:8wwjSMkg Tue 25 Feb 2025 23:16:45 No. 6203761 Report Quoted By:
Anonymous
>>6203757 Oh that reminds me, there is also the problem of beneficial insects dying en masse across the globe, and their biodiversity getting gutted. Maybe we could work on some project to make sure all the bees and beetles don't die.
Anonymous
>>6203746 To my understanding, it would allow natives semi autonomy in lands under federal jurisdiction which also includes all legally declared "Indian Country."
Legally, you don't need an act of Congress to do this, because the Supreme Court already ruled State governments don't have jurisdiction over native land with Worcester vs Georgia.
If this is 2009, McGirt v. Oklahoma hasn't happened yet, so this would be achieving somewhat similar results without that ruling.
In practical matters, it would mean native nations could do things like issue there own drivers licenses, hunting licenses and fishing licenses as if they were a State government.
It would also mean Native Government and State government interactions would legally be done as if they were territories of roughly equal legal status as opposed to the status quo where in many cases, tribal governments would still answer to the Governor's policies.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6203766 Yeah that's the idea. When we get rid of stuff like bark eating beetles, more habitats will ripple outward for other, native insect species.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6203736 I vote AGAINST this. We are a boring moderate liberal, doing a massive reform like
>>6203768 shouldn't be something that we should be doing.
Anonymous
Rolled 15 (1d20) >>6203650 >Work to allow sustainable harvesting of old growth timber in areas with a excess of downed trees with the caveat of requiring those downed trees to be cleared and new trees to be planted. Uhhh, only other thing that comes to mind is reclaiming and decontaminating old industrial zones like contaminated areas around really old played out mines to turn into new Bureau of Land Management areas and public parks.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6203757 Supporting this.
Anonymous
>>6203752 >>6203757 Switching my vote to this. Maintain the status quo.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6203792 Also supporting. Let’s start a very cringe social media strategy to generate some “memes”!
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
Quoted By:
Lots of nice options and discussion for this one. Looks like this one
>>6203757 got the most votes for the main agenda of your tenure, but I’ll also be including these ones as secondary agendas since they rolled well.
>>6203673 >>6203780 Locking these in.
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
Quoted By:
<span class="mu-r"> Test. <span class="mu-g"> Test. <span class="mu-b"> Test. </span></span></span>
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
<span class="mu-r"> Another test.</span>
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
Quoted By:
>>6204415 <span class="mu-g"> One </span> more?
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
Quoted By:
Your first day as secretary is mostly just spent familiarizing yourself with the department and taking stock. Nobody honestly expects you to do anything so early into your tenure. Hell, once you disappeared into your office for an hour or two, any of the small-time reporters waiting outside had dispersed. You spend all afternoon finding your footing and before you even know it, you’re heading to your new home for the night. Damn, if every day is going to skip by that quickly, then you’ll have used up your tenure in no time at all. ~ JANUARY 21 2009 ~ Day 2 as Secretary of Interior. Most reporters are flooding the senate as multiple more cabinet positions are being confirmed for your new president, but a few are standing outside your office as you try to walk in. Their microphones are shoved in your face and their cameras are snapping pictures of you every few seconds. “Mr. Secretary, what are your plans for the next four years? Do you have any?” You were going to push yourself through them and lock yourself in your office, but this is a question you’ve been wanting to answer, and one you intend to do so. You turn to the young lady. “We will be focusing on dedicating our efforts to managing, curtailing, and removal of invasive pest species. These invasive species erode our infrastructure, kill our natural habitats, and cost this country over $200 million last year in the Great Lakes region alone. We must do what we can to limit the harm these pests can do.” The reporter nods on instinct. “Not only that, but we will also work to allow sustainable harvesting of old growth timber in areas with an excess of downed trees with the caveat of requiring those downed trees to be cleared and new trees to be planted.” Another instinctual nod. “And finally, we will be looking into natural areas of the United States and its territories that deserve to be preserved and turned into a national park. If we find something worthwhile, we might not have it fully established during the president’s term, but we’ll at least get the ball rolling. Rest assured that won’t be all the work we will be doing for the people of this country. That’s all the time I have, thank you.” You rush into your office. You have work to do. ~ JANUARY 24 2012 ~ Whew. Time flies by, doesn’t it? But that doesn’t mean you have stayed on top of our work. Aside from the standard regulating that comes with your job, you’ve done your best to work on achieving the goals you laid out on your first days in office. Your department has saved somewhere around $10 billion in damage from pests and invasive species in the last year. You’ve written more sustainable logging practices into law, which have been slowly executed throughout the country. You started an investigation into different sections of federal land in the nation that are currently unused, and have designated two as potential national park locations. (1/3)
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
Quoted By:
You had only mentally prepared yourself for 4 years in Washington. Whether or not the president gets elected to a second term, you figured you are far too milquetoast a man for such a forward thinking progressive. Except he had called you just yesterday to say he hopes you stay on his team for another 4…and seeing how high his approval ratings are going into election season, the chances of another 4 years as Secretary of the Interior are high. But enough about that. The president is in the middle of his State of the Union Address. It’s very important business. Everyone’s there- well, except for you. You’ve been chosen as his Designated Survivor™, which means you’re forced to watch him speak through a TV like the majority of America. You’re in your DC apartment, lounging on the couch while cuddled up with Meredith. You’re both in your pajamas. You’re both sharing a couple cans of beer. The kids are in bed. This is nice… The TV goes black. “Ah, damnit. Did the power go…?” No. It didn’t. The lamps in the corners of the apartment are still working. Before you have a chance to even fully get off of the couch, the secret service start storming through the front door. “Sir, you need to come with me.” “W-What- why? What happened?” “There’s been an attack on the Capitol. We need to get you and your family somewhere safe.” You turn to your wife. Both of you are equally stunned. “What attack? Is everyone okay?” “Meredith, just grab the kids, will you?” You rush over to the window and slide the curtains apart, looking out from your perfect view of the Capitol building. <span class="mu-r"> Oh my God… </span> A glowing fire is erupting out of the Capitol. Smoke billows out of its shattered windows and blown out doors. The city roars to life with blaring sirens and flashing lights as the fire department, the ambulances, the police all speed towards the Capitol. People stumble out of the inferno, disoriented and weak. It’s horrifying to look at, even from afar. You are hurriedly rushed into a black, tinted car along with your wife and kids before being sped off to some nondescript safe place. “What’s going on, mom?!” “N-Nothing, dear. It’s okay. It’s alright. Right, honey?” “Huh? Oh, uh…yes, everything’s going to be just fine, kiddo.” Everything is moving so fast, you don’t even feel the car stopping before you’re hurried out and into a bunker along with your family. Nobody else is there except for the secret service and what looks to be a judge. “Someone tell me what the fuck just happened.” “You saw it, sir. There’s been a terrorist attack on the Capitol. The judges approaches you, Bible in hand. “And what the hell is this guy doing here?” “No bodies have been pulled out of the rubble yet sir, but we believe that most of the damage occurred near the center of the chamber. As of a few moments ago, you are President of the United States.” (2/3)
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
Quoted By:
“P-President?! But that means…” You’re the eighth in line. Eighth! Does that mean that every single person above you is dead?! You don’t have time to think about it before your hand is already on the Bible. “I, Aspen James Foster, do solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.” <span class="mu-r"> “So help me God.” </span> (3/3)
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
No update today. There should be one tomorrow, though.
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
Quoted By:
>>6204423 >update Choices.*
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
Quoted By:
Oh, and here’s a photo someone snapped at the scene.
Anonymous
Well ain't that a lovely start to a presidency. I don't know much about US politic, I assume we're only guaranteed only have two years in your presidency since that's all the time left from the original president?
Anonymous
>>6204493 US presidential terms are four years and it's been three years since the late president took office, so the next election is in November this year i.e. ~nine and a half months away. If we lose, we have one year left including the lame duck period.
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:orRYrsjw Thu 27 Feb 2025 00:50:23 No. 6204518 Report >>6204495 Assuming that we don’t do anything to change that. Tho the USA have more known civilian held firearms than people and it’s military is pledge to uphold the constitution.
Not saying that it it couldn’t happen here, but with only a few months, no pre-existing base of support, no apocalypse (yet), and a reliant on pre-existing and surviving members of government- I don’t think we can go dictator unless we want to be ousted, possibly even by our own secret service.
Anonymous
>>6204518 Or you know, we could just do a good job, and get elected the old fashioned way.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6204554 Poli... ticians? Doing work? You. Huh?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6204554 Woah we got a good guy respecter here boys
Anonymous
>>6204554 Unfortunately this is a democracy not a meritocracy
Anonymous
>>6204518 >>6204423 Do note since the State of the Union also has both houses of Congress, there are likely to be very few living senators and house reps left alive.
That means we could get legislation passed with like 2 people, making it easy to do whatever we want.
we would have to move quickly though. Governors appoint senators in cases of vacancy which means we could have a full Senate to deal with soon.
>>6204566 Despite its branding the US ranks pretty mid tier when it comes to democracy.
https://thefulcrum.us/ethics-leadership/democracy-index DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:LpnEHMNg Thu 27 Feb 2025 04:21:13 No. 6204597 Report Quoted By:
>>6204592 Also the Governors (I think) could call for a constitutional convention if we do to much to fast- plus those 2 senators can work against us if it’s Bill and he’s buddy Ted.
And this is assuming that;
A; a higher person in succession is not dug out of the rubble
B; this dose’t turn into a civil conflict (So far the attacker is unknown)
D: we don’t get approached by the attacker- who is in a position of power- and basically get told to be a figure head (unlikely)
C; This is not a prelude to a world war with the bombing being a first strike that they managed to pull off undetected so far (Very unlikely)
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6204554 I don't think we even need to do a particularly good job. If we manage to pull the US through this at all, even if it's shaky, I'm pretty sure we'll get our face on the dollar bill. Why bother with dictatorship when we could be a fifth head on Mt. Rushmore just by staying president?
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:7WJ9RrY2 Thu 27 Feb 2025 18:56:30 No. 6204830 Report Quoted By:
might be a little ahead of the choices- but think that we should deliver a message that is basically; The Us government is still functioning. We will find whoever done this and give ‘em hell. Kinda want to directly tell whoever done it on live TV ‘’F*** you’’ We will NOT scape-goat our fellow Americans like what happened on 9/11 nor allow those to use this as an excuse to commit atrocities on our fellow Americans. We will not let this divide us. ‘’We survived fighting the biggest nation on earth, we survived a civil war, we survived 2 world wars, we survived the dust bowl, the threat of nuclear Armageddon. We will survive this and come out stronger’’
Anonymous
Alternately, we could go mad with power and become a nature-focused dictator for all of about five days. Give the trees human rights.
Anonymous
Yeah, harkening back to 9/11 is a good idea. A kind of "we've been through hell before and will perservere with strength and discipline" talk to acknowledge what happened and that we will respond in a controlled manner.
>>6204831 lol lmao
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:HqypvdLB Thu 27 Feb 2025 19:07:52 No. 6204839 Report >>6204836 I’m pretty sure we know which govenors might wigout and try to set up their own personal manhunts like what happened in Designated Survivor (Honestly getting a new DS set up should be priority one, if this was me, we don’t want to leave the government empty because of a brain aneurysm). Maybe we can send subtle hints to them that if say the Governor of NY decides to set up Little Gratmino or something- we’ll make the VA’s hissyfit over desegregation look like a civil disagreement in congress.
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:HVYGWkP7 Thu 27 Feb 2025 19:21:35 No. 6204844 Report Quoted By:
>>6204839 And if anyone dose call our bluff- give them one chance to ‘’calm down’’ before we ‘’restore rule of law’’.
Anonymous
>>6204831 This new version of the Lorax frightens me.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6204845 How bad could we be?
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:Ao6KHvg5 Thu 27 Feb 2025 19:36:54 No. 6204850 Report Quoted By:
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
45th President of the United States of America, Aspen James Foster. You never imagined holding that title, yet here you are. You’re not granted any time to let the reality of your situation marinate before you're hounded by news of the attack on the Capitol. “47 bodies have been retrieved from the rubble.” “The nearest hospital is overflowing with patients. We’re redirecting them to a second one now.” “Sorry sir, we need to keep you down here a little longer.” “The fire’s been quarantined to the west side.” It’s all starting to blend together. Hour after hour it’s like this. If this hasn’t been the most miserable start to a presidency in the country’s history, it was a close contender. Each update is like a five pound weight being dropped on your shoulders, and you know your family isn’t enjoying this either. ~ JANUARY 25 2012 ~ You’re tired. You’re hungry. But at least the secret service is allowing you and your family out of the bunker. You are driven straight to the White House, passing by the ruined Capitol. Rubble litters its sides. Bodies are laid out in rows, covered with tarp on the front lawn. Firefighters are seen snuffing out the last remnants of the inferno that surely burnt everything still inside. Once you reach the White House and step out of the car, you are drowned in an army of reporters. Dozens of microphones are shoved in your face. Flashing lights disorient you completely. You can’t make out one hurried question from the next, nor can you differentiate any of the anxious faces that are pointed directly at you. You don’t say anything. You know you’re not prepared for this. They know you’re not prepared for this, either. “Fuck, this is crazy…hey, honey, get the kids something to eat, would you?” You find yourself in the Oval Office. You’ve been in here plenty of times as Secretary already, but now it’s yours. It’s all yours. You still can’t wrap your head around that. You stand on the other end of the desk, reluctant to sit in the president’s chair while you read through a folder that had been waiting for you. “Jesus Christ…” Most of the victims have been accounted for, with only a last few being retrieved from inside of the Capitol. Everybody above you in the chain of command has been confirmed dead, as well as the rest of the secretaries beneath you in line. 95 senators. 414 congressmen. 2 governors. The government has been completely brought to its knees, and now the nation is looking up to you to make it stand up again. You, who just a few days ago your biggest concern was forest fires. Multiple military and civilian officials are standing in your office, waiting for your first commands as commander in chief. (1/2)
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
>I need to give a speech. Let everyone know that America will get through this and come out stronger for it. We can’t allow widespread panic to take place. We need to come together. >Have a security meeting with all the surviving governors. We need to all be on the same page in case the people responsible for this are still residing within our borders. >Meet with the remaining members of Congress. Depending on who survived, they might pose a major obstacle in handling this crisis. I need to make sure they won’t get in the way. >Call some of America’s allies abroad. We might need their support and confidence if this must turn into an international affair. >Write-in. (2/2)
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:QuRWVPb9 Thu 27 Feb 2025 19:54:25 No. 6204863 Report Quoted By:
>>6204852 Write in; Have the Pentagon, command bunkers, and if not done already, White House, searched for traps, explosives, and so on. Order the military to be on full alert.
All options seem to be things we should do in time but first things first;
>I need to give a speech. Let everyone know that America will get through this and come out stronger for it. We can’t allow widespread panic to take place. We need to come together ‘’My fellow Americans, we have been attacked. Not for the first time nor for the last time, but like all times before, we will get through it. We are all scared, we are all angry, we are all afraid. Such feelings are natural but we can not- no- MUST not let this divide us. When we learn who it is- we must not let it cloud our judgment and go after those that only look like them like we did when Empire of Japan bombed Pearl Harbor, or when the Taliban done 9/11, in both times we in fear and anger turned on our fellow countrymen, our fellow Americans, Never Again. We Will find who done this, We Will get justice, (look at the camera directly) and you- whomever you are- I’m sure you want us to act without discipline, to act rash, to do something stupid. here’s your rash stupid action action. (Completely uncensored) Fuck You.
Anonymous
Speech sounds like the correct option here, but if we aren’t a good speaker idk if I want to risk nosediving on the roll….Op are we competent at this sort of thing at all? The other good option seems to be meeting with what’s left of congress
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6204852 >>I need to give a speech. Let everyone know that America will get through this and come out stronger for it. We can’t allow widespread panic to take place. We need to come together. Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6204852 >I need to give a speech. Let everyone know that America will get through this and come out stronger for it. We can’t allow widespread panic to take place. We need to come together. >>6204872 I'm pretty sure the president has helpers for that, but anyway, we need to give a speech regardless, people are probably flipping their absolute shit. It'll be total chaos unless we slam down our hand and calm everyone down.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6204852 >I need to give a speech. Let everyone know that America will get through this and come out stronger for it. We can’t allow widespread panic to take place. We need to come together. This might honestly be THE single most important speech in America history and if we play our cards right, might heal the Left-Right divide for a while.
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
>>6204872 You’re usually average at giving speeches. They’re never remarkable one way or another, but now that you have the best speechwriters in the country and a swell of passion, maybe it’ll be different.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6204879 Well that’s a fair point. Ok then.
>>6204852 >I need to give a speech. Let everyone know that America will get through this and come out stronger for it. We can’t allow widespread panic to take place. We need to come together Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6204852 >I need to give a speech. Let everyone know that America will get through this and come out stronger for it. We can’t allow widespread panic to take place. We need to come together. Come together? Sounds like the motto of a knocking shop in Marrakesh.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6204852 >>I need to give a speech. Let everyone know that America will get through this and come out stronger for it. We can’t allow widespread panic to take place. We need to come together. Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6204852 >I need to give a speech. Let everyone know that America will get through this and come out stronger for it. We can’t allow widespread panic to take place. We need to come together. Anonymous
>>6204851 >Security sweep then
>I need to give a speech. Let everyone know that America will get through this and come out stronger for it. We can’t allow widespread panic to take place. We need to come together. Last thing we want is the Aspen in flames.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6204852 >I need to give a speech. Let everyone know that America will get through this and come out stronger for it. We can’t allow widespread panic to take place. We need to come together. Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6204852 >I need to give a speech. Let everyone know that America's trees will get through this and come out stronger for it. We can’t allow widespread deforestation to take place. We need the national park service to come together. DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:itDOfXT3 Thu 27 Feb 2025 23:33:21 No. 6204930 Report Honestly part of me wonder what sort of memes had already been made about this crisis.
Anonymous
>>6204930 Imagine how /pol/ would have been.
Anonymous
>>6204930 >"The Tree man survived the fire? >Obviously a government plant" DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:FR+FMO+z Thu 27 Feb 2025 23:41:25 No. 6204942 Report >>6204932 Hold on- I think I found a picture of the guy
Anonymous
>>6204852 >>I need to give a speech. Let everyone know that America will get through this and come out stronger for it. We can’t allow widespread panic to take place. We need to come together. >>6204931 Foreign glowies would be sliding EVERYTHING.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6204942 >This man is your friend, he fights for treedom DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:u2L2bs6M Fri 28 Feb 2025 00:01:46 No. 6204951 Report Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6204951 Oh shit guys, a fed's in the building. Scatter!
Anonymous
>>6204852 >Meet with the remaining members of Congress. Depending on who survived, they might pose a major obstacle in handling this crisis. I need to make sure they won’t get in the way. There are 5 senators and 21 congresspeople left alive
3 Senators is a filibuster proof supermajority right now
11 Congress people is all we need to put any law through Congress
We are in a rare position. Never before has a President had such an opportunity with Congress.
We need to lock these people on our side and then immediately have them pass on the laws we need before the Governor's step in and replace the senators.
I know we are a moderate so we prob can't do TOO extreme stuff, but we can at least have a legal shield set up so we can basically do whatever we want with no pushback.
Anonymous
>>6205079 Like making trees legal citizens of the United States of America?
Anonymous
>>6205080 OP is center left by the standard of 2012 USA so I think that may get an "out of character" veto.
But what I am saying is that, in-universe we have close to unlimited Presidential power if we want it. Especially if we pack the Supreme Court, which would be easy with only 5 senatorsto whip.
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:tQF5ZZge Fri 28 Feb 2025 06:01:03 No. 6205138 Report >>6205126 We could do so much speaking for the American people
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6205138 I personally would love an Ecosupremacist Natuve American backed Union.
I just don't know if Foster would be down for that.
We could probably get an EPA with real teeth though.
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
>>6205126 Speaking of the Supreme Court, I forgot to mention this, 8 justices were killed in the explosion as well. I forgot they attend the State of the Union Address when I was writing my last update. So you’ll definitely be responsible for refilling those seats. Whether you choose to pack them or not will be voted on in a later update.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6205152 >Forster >ForEster The Glorious Arboreal Republic shall rise!
Anonymous
Quoted By:
So, when are we getting a call from the shadowy elite global corporate cabal and the Rothschilds?
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:65YRlkF6 Fri 28 Feb 2025 14:27:04 No. 6205259 Report Quoted By:
I’m just saying that chances are; our code word is Lorax. Our political cartoons have us as a Lorax People probably know us as the ‘’Lorax who lives’’. I think we should lean into it.
Anonymous
>>6204913 +1
That. We must begin our term as the paranoid survivor that must bring order back to the chaos.
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:mlFYOIeK Fri 28 Feb 2025 15:47:42 No. 6205276 Report >>6205264 Kinda tracks with the history of America.
It took the assassination of William McKinley for the secret service to do more than go after counterfeiting.
9/11 would also be very fresh- I can see many seeing this as a continuation of attacks on the USA.
QM? Have the 2008 financial crisis happened yet? I would imagine this event would make such a crisis even worse.
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
Security sweep + speech is locked in.
>>6205276 Yes, the 2008 financial crisis did happen. Though the recession that followed had already ended around a year and a half ago. That’s not to say there isn’t a very real risk of another one happening in the fallout of this attack.
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:zT7n/5pV Fri 28 Feb 2025 20:38:34 No. 6205368 Report >>6205309 My guess; the stock market was shut down hours after the attack with the last reports showing massive disruptions, and right now the US diplomatic channels are being flooded with every nation with a grudge saying ‘’we didn’t do it’’. Also every nation with concerns of decapication strikes, (Russia, China, Israel, Ext) are probably scrambling to preform security sweeps of their own while those actively funding terrorism are probably trying to make sure that it wasn’t the organizations that they funded that done this attack.
Honestly would be surprised if less than a dozen states had mobilized their national guard and the DOD haven’t begun to move the gears to recall reservists and other personnel that could be called up in the event of war.
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
Quoted By:
“White House. Pentagon. Command bunkers. Check every nook and cranny for more bombs. I want the military on full alert.” “Already done, sir.” Go figure. If there’s ever a time for security to be at its utmost, it’s now. Kudos to them. “Well, in that case, get Barrett’s speechwriter in here. I wanna address the nation. Today.” “Yes, sir.” The secret service file out of your office, leaving only the men in uniform, badges dripping down their chests. “As for you, I’ll be in touch shortly. But for now, the people need to hear me.” They nod and subsequently walk out of the room before the late president’s speechwriter slips by them and into your office. “Close the door behind you and let’s get to work.” The next hour is spent in a frenzy. You and the speechwriter don’t take a moment’s break as you work on putting out a hasty script. Scribbling, scribbling. “No, no.” Scribbling, scribbling. Before you know it, an hour had passed and you’ve both put out a half-decent speech. If you had more time, it could’ve been far better. But you don’t have time. “It’s not perfect…but it’ll do.” Cameras, sound, lights. They’re all swiftly set up in front of the president’s desk. One of the woman approaches you for makeup, but you brush her off. Now isn’t the time for trivial matters like aesthetic. “Ready whenever you are, Mr. President.” “Right…and this is…?” “Being broadcasted in every part of the nation.” “Right…” You look down at the chair you’ve been leaning on for the past few minutes. You take a deep breath. Then another. Then another. This is it. Your presidency begins now. “Ahem!” You clear your throat as you sit down in the president’s chair, scooting forward and taking a sip of water while your script is fed into a teleprompter. You nod to the cameraman, and he follows up with three fingers in the air. Then two. Then one. Action. “My fellow…” You pause. The realization of how many people are watching this dawns on you. The entire nation, maybe even the entire world, is watching with bated breath to hear what the new leader of the free world will say. “My fellow Americans, my name is Aspen James Foster. Not too long ago, I was your Secretary of the Interior. Yesterday, I was privately sworn in as your President. As you all know, our Capitol building has been the victim of a brutal, violent, and despicable act of terror. Our federal government has been relegated to only a handful of people, half of which are in hospitals as we speak. Yes, this nation has been dealt a serious blow. Yes, these next few months will be a time of turmoil and turbulence. Yes, somebody is responsible. And yes, there is a possibility that those responsible for this horrible attack are still within our borders.” (1/3)
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
Quoted By:
You take a deep breath. “…but regardless of that, this is not the time for witch hunts. It is not the time for the accusation of an entire people like the patriotic Muslims and Sikhs after 9/11 or the hard-working Asians after Pearl Harbor. And while the sight of our nation’s Capitol burning and smoldering fight fill us with disbelief, horror, and a deep, quiet anger, it is not the time for hatred either. No, it is not the time for any of these things.” You can see to the side how many people are listening to you right now. The number rises and falls, but it continues to hover around 130 million people. That nearly forces you to lose track of your spot on the teleprompter and fumble, but you hold on. “Now is a time for mourning, yes. But it is also a time for coming together. For unity. For solidarity. It is time for all Americans to help eachother out, to pick them off the ground when they fall. Help your friends. Help your family. Help your neighbors. For the past 24 hours, our cities have been experiencing panic buying, rioting, and fighting in the streets. Let me remind the people of this great country that you are not the enemy. The people who dared to murder hundreds of our elected officials in cold blood are the enemy, and they have what’s coming to them, so help me God.” You shuffle in your seat, moving it closer to the desk. You motion for the camera to inch closer onto your face, which it does. “And to the ones who are at fault, wherever you are, I have this to say. You are not the first who has wished to bring down the United States and what it stands for, and you won’t be the last. And just like every other enemy of this beautiful country, you will be brought to justice. To you, and anyone else who fights for them, I promise you this: Someone else will be raising your sons and daughters.” “Thank you, and may God bless these United States of America.” The cameraman motions that the televising has ended and pans the camera away. The crew begins to pack the gear up. You nearly fall out of your seat from the sigh that escapes your body. That must’ve been the most anxiety-inducing thing you’ve done yet. That number is still ingrained in your mind. 130 million people were tuned into that, and hundreds of millions more will listen to the words you said in the future to come. You only have a few minutes to collect your composure before the next pressing issue needs to be addressed. You’re in the situation room. One of your intelligence officers had just informed you that someone had claimed responsibility for the attack. (2/3)
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
“They are a terrorist group located in Iraq by the name of MFSA, or Mujahideen for the sake of God. They’ve been active in the region since 2004 but have never executed any offensive outside Iraq and Syria. We don’t yet know if they’re being funded by any other organizations or governments. Their leader, Rajab al-Hai, claims this is the first of many attacks if the US doesn’t completely withdraw from the Middle East.” “I see.” “That’s not all, sir. We have reason to believe that al-Hai had support on the inside. Presumably someone who knew the layout of the Capitol and had easy access getting in and out.” “What’s the plan, Mr. President?”>There’s still a chance whoever al-Hai had on the inside is still alive and well in the United States. We need to find them first. (feel free to get specific with how) >We can’t waste any time. I know we just pulled out of Iraq last month, but we need to go on the attack and find that son of a bitch. (again, feel free to get specific) >Write-in. (3/3)
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
Quoted By:
Here’s a picture of the man claiming responsibility.
>>6205368 I hope to address the inevitable economic crisis and other world powers eventually. But yes, everyone else is currently preparing for a terrorist attack of their own and praying the ones who blew up the Capitol ain’t theirs. If you decide to have a meeting with the governors, you’ll get to see how they’re responding to this as well.
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
Quoted By:
And here’s the organization’s flag.
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:zT7n/5pV Fri 28 Feb 2025 20:54:01 No. 6205378 Report >>6205373 >There’s still a chance whoever al-Hai had on the inside is still alive and well in the United States. We need to find them first. (feel free to get specific with how) Review all construction done on the Capital starting at 5 years increments, any and all contractors are to be interviewed when possible. If this was someone alive who wasn’t intending to die he might have tried to hedge he’s bets by reinforcing a part of the capital. Meanwhile have all surviving recording in and out of the capital recorded, maybe we get lucky and we see someone pressing the button through a window. If anyone gets any leads otherwise- I would like to be in the loop.
>We can’t waste any time. I know we just pulled out of Iraq last month, but we need to go on the attack and find that son of a bitch. (again, feel free to get specific) Give the terror organization 24 hours to hand us the bastard and he’s top leadership alive and well, we want question them, As soon as we start to get a list of nations who funded these guys I want to deliver a ultimatum to those nations; Admit to the funding on life television for all of your people to see, hand over all documentation of funding, and to end all funding. If you don’t- any cargo-ship that enters or leaves your port will be seized by the US navy at next connivance as reparations for this attack and you will be viewed as just as responsible as those bastards. If we had funded them- I want us to admit to it before such a declaration.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6205378 You might just want to hold off on that declaration, anon. Chances are, that group was probably funded by either the CIA or Israel. Those guys *love* funding terrorist groups.
Anonymous
>>6205373 >There’s still a chance whoever al-Hai had on the inside is still alive and well in the United States. We need to find them first. We do not know enough yet to go charging off half-cocked back into the sandbox swinging again like in 2001. Was it even them? Who are they? Where are they? Who's backing them, if anybody? We need leads before we act, dammit.
Everyone who has had access to the Capitol Building in the five days before the attack who is not a child or foreign leader will be temporarily prohibited from leaving the country or, if they have, marked as a suspect. Start pulling tapes, access records, background checks, police histories. Then we allow on-scene forensics to start piecing together what happened so we can continue to narrow things down. But all in all, I'm sure the FBI and Secret Service are already all over all of these things and frankly I'd rather trust them to do their job rather than meddle.
Don't involve the Iraqi government in this at this stage. While they're unlikely to be involved themselves (at the high level, at least) since these terrorist groups are their enemies too, they are still dysfunctional, corrupt and leak intel like a sieve. When we have something concrete and actionable, then we can and will get their cooperation in crushing those responsible by hook or by crook.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6205393 +1
Supporting this.
God forbid one of the surviving Senators or Congressmen was in on this.
More broadly though, if we demand these guys hand over their leaders, are we actually under the impression they’d accept? Didn’t work that well with Osama, and this was a far more devastating blow than that. We’d look foolish.
Anonymous
>>6205393 I'll be supporting your vote since this is more reasonable.
We >There’s still a chance whoever al-Hai had on the inside is still alive and well in the United States. We need to find them first.
Oh yes, another thing? We should definitely get to doing some reforms domestically while we still have a gigantic advantage. We should DEFINITELY pack the Supreme Court if we want to be able to actually do something.
I know this is gonna sound undemocratic but this is a chance of the century, you know? Aspen, as far as we know, was *not* corrupt. Do you know how ridiculously and insanely rare that is in a democracy? A politician that doesn't have a mountain of blackmail to be manipulated with and isn't a soulless husk driven entirely by interest groups?
I say, pack the Supreme Court. Pack the congress. Become a complete independent. Break the two party system over our knees like George Washington wanted us to.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6205397 Damn, accidentally pasted a vote in the middle. Ignore that.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6205373 >There’s still a chance whoever al-Hai had on the inside is still alive and well in the United States. We need to find them first. (feel free to get specific with how) Do a sweep of the nation, looking for any relevant information with the attack. How were they able to do this, exactly? Where are they from? Leads are good, and we should be looking into our own system first before getting jingoistic with the world (again).
We should look into our own departments, secret service, or other gov officials for foul play, just in case.
And this might not have much to do with this current vote, but we should find ways to make sure that the average American is prepared if there's ever a major collapse in governance.
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:65YRlkF6 Fri 28 Feb 2025 21:49:11 No. 6205401 Report >>6205393 I change my vote to this. Let’s save the drastic actions for later
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Now that reasonable discussion is going on and this option has no chance of gaining traction,
>Eliminate the problem at its source. "Reasonable and proportionate response" the entire Middle East, and then work to turn the remains into America's next National Park over the next hundred years. On a more serious note,
>>6205397 has a good point.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6205393 +1
Lol declaring Iraq II Electric Boogaloo with our government in this state would be insane. We need answers, not to go off half-cocked.
Anonymous
>>6205393 +1
Also add asking Iraq for any information about this terror group. Either they send us bait traps, total knowledge of the group, or silence so we have something to match our internal investigation to when we send SFs to look into the country.
Anonymous
>>6205401 >he doesn't want to vote you use the entire nuclear stockpile simultaneously to blanket the middle east completely in destruction to ensure effect on target and remove the terrorist threat These advisors got no guts man I swear to Timbs-wearing Baby Jesus.
Anonymous
>>6205406 >These advisors got no guts man I swear to Timbs-wearing Baby Jesus. Guts? I'll tell you what takes guts. Nationalizing the Federal Reserve and taking down the Sillicon Valley Corporatocracy.
Anonymous
>>6205411 It isn't already national? Isn't that what the 'federal' bit means?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6205412 >he doesn't know Anonymous
>Everybody above you in the chain of command has been confirmed dead, as well as the rest of the secretaries beneath you in line Worth noting the whole Cabinet seems to have been utterly smoked too. An anon above mentioned the possibility of packing the court with actual independents/non hacks, but I think this is also a rare opportunity in its own right. I think a lot of goodwill could easily be fostered if we take the time to wrangle together a bipartisan cabinet instead of just appointing all Dems. Obviously nobody utterly opposed to our personal views but the olive branch of having some boring moderate conservatives or New England GOP/Phil Scott types might be worth it. “We’re all in it together”, and everything. We could also possibly make use of recess appointments, though the PR of that could get pretty ugly if we try to hammer anyone too extreme through in a time like this. Idk.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6205414 Ideally, we should appoint a cabinet (and pack the court) as soon as possible with the goal of getting people who actually want to get something done. We have a chance to literally only pick competent people instead of having to reward a bunch of career politicians with positions as a reward for campaign favors.
The earlier we do it, the more we can wave away concerns with "We need a functional government to react to this crisis"
Anonymous
>>6205373 >We can’t waste any time. I know we just pulled out of Iraq last month, but we need to go on the attack and find that son of a bitch. (again, feel free to get specific) Request the Iraqi government allow us to conduct a limited bombing campaign against MFSA. No boots on the ground, just air power.
Meanwhile direct the CIA to do their best to find this guy. Quietly, with the air campaign as a distraction, get their sources on the ground to find his location and turn it into rubble.
>>6205393 We still need a response to this guy. Can't let anyone up and claim they killed most of Congress and get away with it. He's going to become Bin Laden 2, and we'll be damend if we let him get away with it for as long as he did.
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:d2r+b+p3 Fri 28 Feb 2025 22:56:48 No. 6205431 Report >>6205427 That’s a good point-
Maybe to help the CIA we can go on live television and basically call the man an unmanly wimp. Tell hem that he dose not have the courage or faith in god (have some spooks in the CIA help us write it) to do anything now that the world is looking for hem.
Anonymous
>>6205427 >>6205431 Please stop trying to go all 9/11 when we don't even know half the things that happened. It's not gonna work, bro.
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:WqCHr7wW Fri 28 Feb 2025 23:03:22 No. 6205440 Report >>6205438 More or less I am suggesting to do something that might cause mr ‘’let me take credit at minimum’’ to do something stupid that the CIA could use to track hem.
Anonymous
>>6205438 Hey, Bush got re-elected after Iraq, why can't we? And it's not like we're pulling an invasion or risking American lives. Just giving some sort of response to arguably the greatest act of terrorism in the country's history, instead of seemingly ignoring it.
Anonymous
>>6205440 Bro, for all we know the CIA *funded* this guy. We really need to check our situation and form an actual government that can stand on its legs before we think about retribution.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6205443 >Hey, Bush got re-elected after Iraq, why can't we Because this ain't 2004 no more, bro.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6205443 I don’t think anyone is inherently opposed to drone striking this guy, but we need more information if we’re actually gonna have a decent chance of success. Otherwise it’s just noise. No way these niggers are just standing around in the open after pulling this off.
Anonymous
>>6205393 +1
>>6205444 Personally I'm betting it's a CIA+Mossad op upset at our dear comrade president's pull-out from Iraq. This plot just looks like it glows in the dark, especially if most of the surviving congressmen are neocons who didn't attend a Democrat State of the Union "out of principle"...
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:QGgJf+SF Fri 28 Feb 2025 23:32:22 No. 6205453 Report >>6205451 Didn’t the head of the CIA get killed in the attack?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6205451 I don't follow this baseless schizophrenia at all.
Anonymous
>>6205451 Nah, see, though I'm usually a big conspiracy guy, I don't think this is one. Why the hell would they leave Aspen of all people to "inherit" the seat? Surely they had someone else who was more closely aligned than fuckin Lorax man, no?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6205456 >tfw their chosen man actually just suffered a brain aneurysm two minutes before the attack went off completely out of the blue Anonymous
Something I just thought of but Idt anyone has mentioned. Isn’t it possible al-Hai is just larping? It’s hardly unknown for these groups to take credit for things that were actually unrelated to them(Isis has done this a good bit.) And some relatively regional group who were B-Listers until now sounds sort of like the outfit who’d want to claim credit early and gain a reputation bonus with other similar groups
Anonymous
>>6205453 Was he? Well the CIA director is a presidential appointee too so maybe it's only lower CIA members involved and not the head himself.
>>6205456 The president is a "forward thinking progressive" so we're probably one of the most moderate people in the cabinet. The masterminds could also think that we're relatively weak and easy to control, since our only powerbase is... park rangers and Indians, unlike other secretaries who have greater bases like, say, Labor which can count on the unions or the VA which has a (retired) army to support him.
>>6205458 It is very possible. That is part of why I am opposed to immediately bombing them, since bombing them often increases the power of terrorist groups since it gives them legitimacy in "resisting the west" and every brother, uncle, and nephew of any unfortunate villager accidentally bombed joins the terrorists for revenge.
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:jlTDDm6v Fri 28 Feb 2025 23:57:21 No. 6205464 Report Quoted By:
>>6205458 I think we should have the CIA actually take a look and see if they did this.
Normally I would be of the opinion of ‘’LARP around and find out’’, but someone just tried and almost succeeded in wipeing out the leadership of the most powerful nation on earth and the 2nd biggest nuclear stockpile.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6205373 >>There’s still a chance whoever al-Hai had on the inside is still alive and well in the United States. We need to find them first. (feel free to get specific with how) DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:vjgUTE9g Sat 01 Mar 2025 00:17:22 No. 6205472 Report Quoted By:
I maintain my vote on finding out who done the attack on the inside. But I’m changing my Mosod vote; Begin to collect intel, don’t start bombing yet. Don’t make any indications that we don’t believe these fools- simply make it seem like the Gov is a little slow to respond due to the attack. Have a for show sweep of our nuclear facilities, Silos, and so on and have it ‘’leak’’ to make it seem like we found a credible threat to such capabilities. It would be risky but I believe most people would believe that making sure your doomsday weapons haven’t been tampered with is more important than blowing up 3 terrorists in a truck. Outside of the yahoos who done the attack- there’s still our rivals, and opponents, everyone from MS13 to Russia and China, who might make our life hell if they feel they can get away with it.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6205373 >First priority is intel gathering. We move into this when we are more informed. Reach out to intelligence agencies and allies for help. >While that's going on, we need to appoint new people. We should go for moderate liberals like ourselves and maybe a few celebrity types who are qualified, familiar faces to put people at ease. Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6205463 Actually yeah sounds like the masterminds expected us to panic and run around like a headless chicken only to find out the park babysitter is focusing on stability and intel instead of charging in. So ergo someone in the government might offer plans to tie themselves into controlling the govt.
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
Quoted By:
No update today, but it seems like this one’s winning.
>>6205393 Feel free to correct me or point out any add-ons. This ain't an official locking in post, though.
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
Quoted By:
>>6205393 >>6205405 I’ll lock these two in now.
>>6205397 As for this one, you’ll get the chance to deal with the Supreme Court soon.
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
Quoted By:
“Prohibit anyone who had access to the Capitol Building since five days before the attack from leaving the country. All except foreign leaders and children. Anyone who has left already will be marked as a suspect.” “Yes, sir.” Two national security officials leave the situation room after you give the order, pulling out their phones and beginning to make calls on the way out. “Start pulling tapes, access records, background checks, police histories. Anything you can find.” “Already on it, sir. The forensic team’s sweeping the Capitol as well.” Once again, you have to give them props. You were worried that you would have to make every single decision on this, so seeing others taking initiative is a welcome sight. “And what about Iraq, Mr. President?” “Iraq…don’t involve them just yet. Ask them about any information they have on the MFSA and al-Hai, but that’s as far as we go at this point.” “On it, sir.” Another man rushes out of the Situation Room to get in touch with the Iraqi government. Now you’re just left with a bunch of generals waiting for your orders. “That’s all. Let me know when you have anything. The sooner the better.” An air of disappointment surrounds some of these generals, but the majority just accept it plainly. What did they expect? You may not have any experience dealing with international affairs, but you’re not just going to jump into a war and get more Americans killed without any concrete proof of anything. For all you know, this Rajab fellow is simply lying for the sake of boosting his reputation among the local extremists. You leave the situation room, heading straight back to the Oval Office to decide on your next course of action. You call for Barrett’s- no, your chief of staff. “Rory. You got here quick.” “I was already on my way, sir. I figured you might have wanted to see these.” He hands you a series of letters, all bundled up. “What’s this?” “They started coming in after your speech. They’re, for the most part, positive.” “Thank you, Rory.” You drop the letters onto the top of your desk. You don’t have time to read them now, but maybe you’ll look at a few later tonight. “Letters aside, the reason I called you in here is…” (1/2)
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
>”I want you to put together a list of names for the Supreme Court.” With 8 open seats, you’ve just been given a once in a lifetime opportunity. No President has had to fill this many seats since Washington, and with the Senate momentarily grazed down to a meager 5, it would be easier than ever to do so. You could make it nice and balanced, you could stack it full of Democrats…whatever you choose, you won’t have nearly as hard a time getting it done in the government’s current state. >”Let’s tackle our cabinet.” There’s a lot of positions that are vacant right now. Practically everything from the Vice President down to the lowest Secretary. A head of state is only as good as his cabinet, so what does that make you? Again, this would be much easier now that there’s only 5 senators. >”I wanna meet with Congress. Gather them all up for me, will you?” You don’t have much time before replacements start to file in. If you want something to get passed through Congress in a speedy manner, now’s the time to do so. That is, if the numbers are even on your side. >”I wanna meet with our governors. We need to be on the same page regarding national security.” You’re sure most of, if not all of them have taken the appropriate measures, but it doesn’t hurt to be sure. You don’t know if your speech to the nation did anything to help the disorder across the country, but even if it did, this isn’t something you could do just by yourself. >Write-in. (2/2)
Anonymous
>>6206579 I'm not an american, so I can't answer this, what do you anons think is more 'immediate'? From what I know, we don't need to *immediately* stack the court since we're gonna do it later anyways, right?
Would it perhaps be better to try to pass any laws we want while congress is very tiny and small?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6206579 >Congress first to see if we have enough people on our side >If so, then Court, Cabinet, Governors. >If not, then second try to get as many Governors on our side as possible so we can pack Congress to the best of our abilities. DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:eDvP5qxg Sun 02 Mar 2025 20:45:02 No. 6206610 Report >”I wanna meet with our governors. We need to be on the same page regarding national security.” You’re sure most of, if not all of them have taken the appropriate measures, but it doesn’t hurt to be sure. You don’t know if your speech to the nation did anything to help the disorder across the country, but even if it did, this isn’t something you could do just by yourself. >>6206582 The state governments have a fair bit of power compared to most other nations. We can stack the court later but ensuring no one is going to go half cock, South Is Rising Again, or like an Inquisitor is quite important.
In US history there been plenty of times when State Governments reacted, ‘’negatively’’ let’s just say, to domestic issues or outright refuse to respect federal law.
Anonymous
>>6206610 >The state governments have a fair bit of power compared to most other nations. That much I know, but at the same time, with how small the congress it, wouldn't we also want to pass some laws while it's small?
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:DOL8lj2r Sun 02 Mar 2025 20:58:58 No. 6206620 Report >>6206612 Honestly I see both as quite important. My concern with the states is that we might get into a situation where we have to nationalize someone’s Nat Gard, it might or might not end well considering that even VPs to a degree are elected into office as opposed to us.
Anonymous
>>6206620 The fiberal goobermint is supposed to exist to mediate between the states and to pursue the interests of the American people internationally. The individual states are allowed to be pissy.
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:TVinrXuH Sun 02 Mar 2025 21:29:08 No. 6206647 Report >>6206643 Oh I agree, but there’s a difference between pissy and using the Natural Gard to prevent desegregation, Or deciding that all Muslim Americans need to be rounded up and questioned like what happened in Designated Survivor.
This is to at minimum get a hand on the pulse of stupidity while talking to them face to face to ensure that we will act within the constitution.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6206579 >”I wanna meet with our governors. We need to be on the same page regarding national security.” You’re sure most of, if not all of them have taken the appropriate measures, but it doesn’t hurt to be sure. You don’t know if your speech to the nation did anything to help the disorder across the country, but even if it did, this isn’t something you could do just by yourself The Supreme Court can wait given only the president can even propose new members.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6206579 >”I wanna meet with Congress. Gather them all up for me, will you?” You don’t have much time before replacements start to file in. If you want something to get passed through Congress in a speedy manner, now’s the time to do so. That is, if the numbers are even on your side. ThePresident !P6Hf/gKKL2
Quoted By:
>>6206579 >”Let’s tackle our cabinet.” There’s a lot of positions that are vacant right now. Practically everything from the Vice President down to the lowest Secretary. A head of state is only as good as his cabinet, so what does that make you? Again, this would be much easier now that there’s only 5 senators. Cabinet's going to stick around as long as we are around. We can get people loyal to us, and most importantly professionals who aren't picked for their political connections here, which is what we need.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6206579 >”Let’s tackle our cabinet.” There’s a lot of positions that are vacant right now. Practically everything from the Vice President down to the lowest Secretary. A head of state is only as good as his cabinet, so what does that make you? Again, this would be much easier now that there’s only 5 senators. Crank this out.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6206579 >>”I wanna meet with our governors. We need to be on the same page regarding national security.” You’re sure most of, if not all of them have taken the appropriate measures, but it doesn’t hurt to be sure. You don’t know if your speech to the nation did anything to help the disorder across the country, but even if it did, this isn’t something you could do just by yourself. AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
Cabinet: 2 Congress: 2 Governors: 3 Locking meeting with the governors in.
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:eKekU3r5 Mon 03 Mar 2025 18:53:53 No. 6207158 Report Quoted By:
>>6207150 My money is that we’re going to get some issues from New York or Texas. Maybe Idaho.
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
Quoted By:
”I wanna meet with our governors. We need to be on the same page regarding national security.” “On it.” Your chief of staff rushes off, phone in hand to set up the emergency meeting, closing the left door behind him and leaving you alone in the Oval Office for the very first time. Nobody is rushing in to force another immediate issue on your desk. Nobody is hovering over you, waiting for your orders. It’s just you. The silence in the Oval Office is deafening. You know it won’t last. It won’t be long until some other remnant of the last administration comes waltzing in. You recline in your seat, close your eyes, and enjoy those moments of silence… “Mr. President, please take a look at this.” …and there it goes. Back to work, it seems. You have a country in crisis to run. ~ JANUARY 26 2012 ~ It’s extremely early in the day. Early enough that the sun isn’t even visible yet. The last of the union’s governors have arrived at the airport just half an hour ago, and now you have just arrived by car to the designated spot for your emergency meeting. A nice, clean gallery. A room was cleared out and filled with enough tables and chairs to fit at least 50 people. When you walk through the door and onto the podium, you see that everyone is here. Every man and woman in charge of running every state in the union is looking at you. Cameras are on. Reporters are pinned along the walls. “Ahem…thank you all for coming on such short notice. And I offer my sincerest condolences to the states of California and Texas for the deaths of their governors in this despicable attack.” Indeed, the former president invited both of them to the State of the Union, and indeed neither of them made it out. Sitting in their places are their deputies, now sworn in as full-fledged governors. “I’ve called this meeting here today to address our national security. Our intelligence agencies are in the process of an investigation, but we have yet to uncover any names.” “What about Rajab al-Hai? Didn’t he claim responsibility for the attack?” That’s the Governor of New York, Arthur Valletta speaking. He was one of the first to enact a state of emergency, since New York City is a good target for any terrorist attacks in the near future. Being a blue dog Democrat certainly helped, too. “We’re considering our options with him, but right now we don’t have any solid proof of his claims. We won’t be making the same mistake we made in 2003.” You look around the room. It’s obvious there’s a divide. Some are disappointed or irritated that you won’t instantly go on the offensive and others seem to be relieved in your cautiousness. “al-Hai aside, we do know one thing. Whoever is responsible for this attack needed to have someone on the inside. Someone who had access to the Capitol building…and there’s a chance that person is still residing within our borders. This is why I need your cooperation on this.” (1/2)
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
You point to a map behind you, showing which states in the Union have already enacted a state of emergency and which ones haven’t. Luckily for you, the vast majority already have. But a small remnant, 7 to be precise, are holding out on you for one reason or another. You need to address these people first before you can move forward. How will you do so?>I’ll them the carrot. I’ll promise that I’ll do them a favor if they cooperate. The others who had already cooperated might feel left out, though. (Feel free to be specific.) >I’ll give them the stick. Threaten them with some sort of punishment if they don’t cooperate. This might put me on their bad side, though. (Again, feel free to be specific.) >Damn them. I don’t need these crooks anyways. I’ll work with the other governors to ensure the security of this country. >Write-in. (2/2
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:V1bc3IdV Mon 03 Mar 2025 20:23:36 No. 6207193 Report >>6207187 Do we know the reasons why those states haven’t enacted a state of emergency?
Anonymous
>>6207187 >Just ask them nicely to do it. If they don't they don't. Deploy the Border Patrol along the us/Canada border where there is no state of emergency and same with the Coast Gaurd and ocean-facing escapes. Anonymous
>>6207193 I imagine it’s because they are so out of the way or would make little sense for someone to attack. Why bomb Vermont? Etc.
It sets a bad example though, so they really should do one anyways. Still I’m curious what the excuse is
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:V1bc3IdV Mon 03 Mar 2025 20:48:00 No. 6207200 Report Quoted By:
>>6207198 Looking at the states- makes sense (tho those interior states have A LOT of nuclear silos, if it wasn’t for the security sweep that would be a red flag)
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
>>6207198 This is essentially their excuse, yes.
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:e13r2RHy Mon 03 Mar 2025 20:58:38 No. 6207206 Report >>6207204 Ok I support
>>6207195 But add in that ‘’due to the emergency and abnormal situation, I will need to be transparent to the public as to why this is being done’’.
Basically subtlety and plausible deniability threaten them with bad press.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6206579 >Supreme Court In the US government the Supreme Court is the closest thing to God. They can grant us large leeway to do almost anything.
Getting Congress under control before replacements come in is also valuable but if we have to prioritize, the Court comes first .
Anonymous
>>6206647 If the states get pissy we can handle them. We have more guns and we control a large amount of funds.
As long as the Supreme Court signs off on it we can do a lot .
Anonymous
>>6207187 Governors appoint Senators in times of vacancy. They have a lot of power here. Is there any way we can use this as leverage?
For example, we let them declare emergencies or not as they see for but only if they appoint people we approve of as Senators?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6207209 >Agree to let the States not enact states of emergency as long as we get to sign off on who they pick as replacement Senators. DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:mZM91Ily Mon 03 Mar 2025 21:09:05 No. 6207211 Report >>6207208 2 big things;
I don’t want to become the Designated Dictator
I don’t want a general more loyal to the constitution than the president believe that we are making a power grab.
Yes- we can handle the states- we might be able to handle all of the states together, but if the perpetrator is someone with legitimacy somehow- I can see such a person try to make a call to arms. They might even try to fabricate shaky evidence that we are responsible- something that people might believe if we start hitting people with a big stick more than we speak softly.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6207195 Will support this I suppose
Anonymous
>>6207211 >>6207211 The Supreme Court is the ultimate interpreter of the Constitution.
If this General is more loyal to the Constitution than the president, they will abide by Court orders.
I want to do everything here legally and by the book, with no extra-constitutional power grabs.
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:qBPfFoYW Tue 04 Mar 2025 01:46:17 No. 6207335 Report >>6207330 There been historical president of people use the letter of the law for power grabs.
I want to follow the letter, but I don’t want to raise any red flags if I can avoid it. Save the big stick for when we need it.
Anonymous
>>6207335 I agree with the tactical value of subtly.
I think we can spin the horse trade with the governors as something like.
If Diane Feinstein of Left Coast California can vote for the Iraq War, we can get an Alaskan senator willing to back us right now.
"I resect Federalism and will allow you all to choose your own path with this emergency. If you choose to avoid declaring emergencies I ask that you back Senators who will join a new unity government in the interest of national security."
The rally around the flange effect is strong.
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:xZtjotgS Tue 04 Mar 2025 06:31:49 No. 6207449 Report Quoted By:
>>6207435 I agree, do you think the subtle threat of bad PR would be to much?
Such border gards would disrupt travel and might peve people off.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6207187 >Write-in "I ask that the states that have not enacted state of emergency to do so now for the sole reason that the traitor agents might escape through the lax security. Especially Deleware."
Okay Alaska makes sense they would not but Delaware and Vermont is going to leak our traitors and let them escape. Either air or border crossings can allow them to escape so we must close those lines off.
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
Quoted By:
“Look, I won’t try and force any of you to lock your state down. I will respect whatever choice you decide to make. But I’ll have to be transparent about this, you see.” You gesture towards the line of reporters along the wall to your left, cameras on you and recording every minute of this meeting. In hindsight, perhaps it was redundant to say that you’ll have no choice but to be transparent. You can’t exactly cover up something blatantly being filmed and photographed for a wide, national audience, so this doesn’t strike a chord with any of the governors. “With that said, I will also be deploying the border patrol along our northern border and sending out the Coast Guard along our Atlantic coastline. I hope that those of you this will effect will cooperate as needed to ensure that the culprits of this attack do not escape.” The rest of the meeting went uneventfully. Most of it is simple information regarding the current situation being shared amongst you and the governors who had already implemented a state of emergency. Trivial knowledge at best, and no concrete leads. By the time the meeting comes to an end, you’ve only made any real progress in convincing Delaware to enact a state of emergency. The four western states and Alaska had still remained firm, whether that’s because of them insisting they were so far out of the way of any major threats (save for their nuclear silos, which have already been double checked and double checked again, not to mention the amped up security) or runaway terrorists or because they’re simply resisting a Democratic president. Perhaps it was a little of both. As you are leaving the venue, you stop by the men’s bathroom to relieve yourself. You walk into the bathroom and walk straight towards the nearest urinal. It’s quiet. Much quieter than the outside is. There’s only one other person in there with you. “Governor Bernstein.” “Mr. President.” Jacob Bernstein, governor of Vermont. As of just an hour ago, he’s one of six remaining who has not enacted a state of emergency. He’s also the one who you understand the reason behind the least. He’s not as out of the way of any terrorists attempting to cross the border like, say, Alaska or Montana. He’s also not a Republican, either. In fact, he’s arguably more progressive than the former president was. This event has proven useless in figuring out what would be needed to get him to fall in line, but maybe now that you’re alone… “What do you want?” “Pardon?” The governor stops in place halfway towards the door before turning around to face you, wiping his hands dry. “You know I’m gonna need you to fall in line more than the other remainders. I know you’re not doing this for any partisan grandstanding, either. You want something. Just tell me what that something is.” “Hmph…” (1/2)
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
The governor tilts his head back, making sure there’s nobody else in the room. He tosses the crumpled up paper towel in one of the garbage holes in the sink before he leans against it, looking back at you. “Well, that depends. What can you offer me? If you plan on running for a second term in Barrett’s place, which I’m sure you’d win, we’d have plenty of time to work with, but otherwise…” “There’s only a handful of people in Congress right now. I’m hoping to meet with them soon before you and the other governors refill the senate.” “If I understand correctly….you're offering to push something that I want, and in return, I enact a state of emergency?” You nod. “I see…then how about this? Send some infrastructure money my way, maybe $3 billion or so, AND…” Bernstein thinks for a moment. “Ah, yes. Senator Pattinson wanted to pass an insulin bill before she retired. Then the attack happened. It would be nice if you could push for that in her honor, right? Lower some patent lifespans. Lower some price caps…”>”Deal. I’ll get Congress to pass these and you’ll enact a state of emergency.” >”I can do ONE of those, and then we’d have a deal.” (Pick one.) >”No deal. You can enact a state of emergency or don’t. I won’t be giving you any special treatment.” >Write-in. (2/2)
Anonymous
>>6207833 Wait, I don't get it. By "lower price cap" do you mean "lower the maximum price" aka make it cheaper, or "lower the restrictions on pricing" aka make it more expensive?
Anonymous
>>6207833 As in, make insulin more affordable and producible by more people? If so...
>”I can do ONE of those, and then we’d have a deal.” (Insulin Bill) >Shake on it if he agrees. "You know, that's something I'd gladly do." AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
>>6207836 I suppose that is a bit too vague. He means "lower the maximum price.”
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6207840 Okay, so make it cheaper, right? That sounds good to me. It should also make the people happier.
>>6207833 >”I can do ONE of those, and then we’d have a deal.” (Insulin bill) Anonymous
>>6207833 >”I can do ONE of those, and then we’d have a deal.” (Pick one.) >Insulin The insulin thing is a super easy way to score populist points though it will make Big Pharma seethe like nothing else
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6207843 >though it will make Big Pharma seethe like nothing else Good. The more popular we get the more we can fuck them over without them being able to do anyhting back.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6207833 >>”I can do ONE of those, and then we’d have a deal.” (Insulin Bill) >>6207843 >though it will make Big Pharma seethe like nothing else Good fuck Big Pharma. most citizens can agree on that.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6207843 It will be Gov. Bernstein's name pushing the legislation though. He'll be the one getting most of the brownie points with people. But he is totally going to slide the attention he'll get from Pharma unto us. I am sure this is a long con by B-boy here.
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:wyPb3L2a Tue 04 Mar 2025 21:56:21 No. 6207870 Report >>6207837 Support.
Honestly I had a short list of things we should do- I had this between ‘’Space Force’’ and ‘’Decriminalize Weed/make it a State manner’’
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:RMHd0+c0 Tue 04 Mar 2025 21:59:29 No. 6207872 Report >>6207870 Speaking of potential bills;
How dose a 5 billion dollar bounty for the first corporation to profitably mine some asteroids/the moon sound? If the USA can get what it wants from space, we don’t have to deal with China’s grip of rare-earths? Maybe we can sell it as a way to get green tech to be cheaper?
Anonymous
>>6207872 Uh, maybe get the country in order before we start thinking about 'space mining'?
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:NLp/LYb3 Tue 04 Mar 2025 22:05:58 No. 6207881 Report Quoted By:
>>6207878 Good point. Then again the country was a mess when we gotten to the Moon.
Probably should save it for the 2nd term.
Anonymous
>>6207872 >profitably mine some asteroids Th closest reliable source of asteroids in our solar system is next to Jupiter. Just to get there would take longer than our terms would last. And actually mining anything at this point would be not only slow but horrifically inefficient. To get any decent haul from space mining would require sending a truly gargantuan vessel into space. In 2009 we can't even land a space shuttle without crashing it into the ocean. It's just not happening at all. We're probably not going to see space mining in OUR lifetimes, and certainly not truly profitable enterprises in doing so. Mining is space also comes with a fuckton of issues, even if it's on a large stable body like the moon. The moon in particular has superfine dust that is also corrosive IIRC. Digging in that stuff will obliterate most machinery. And the amount of stuff we'd be able to ship would have to fit in a space shuttle which is about the size of a commercial airliner, which it itself chock full of gubbins to make the thing work. You'd be spending millions of dollars just to get at most tens of thousands of dollars of mineral wealth per trip.
Technology just isn't there man.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6207833 Write in: "Honestly I was expecting blackmail, threats, or leaks not affordable medicines. Sure, I can push the insulin bill and deal with pharma hits instead."
I really thought we would deal with intrigue but nah he just wants reelection on something we would have done anyway. Also better insulin than infrastructure as that can be more easily stolen by other people.
>>6207872 No space mining. We won't be here long enough for that to matter so focus on domestic issues instead.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6207843 First insulin, next antibiotics, then viral gene therapies to fix lactose intolerance.
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:aZHUk8El Tue 04 Mar 2025 22:25:57 No. 6207891 Report Quoted By:
>>6207885 I was thinking capturing a Near Earth Object and get it orbit around the Moon. One of those suckers have more gold and platinum than what we have mined as a species.
Honestly I suggested it as a ploy to get space-development jumpstarted earlier and think it should be done in the 2nd term at minimum.
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:p8+je7hM Tue 04 Mar 2025 22:39:31 No. 6207895 Report I was also thinking of more grounded (pun intended) proposals also; Decriminalizing weed Founding the US Space Force. Big infrastructure bill for the USA to re-establish mass-transit. Investments into alternative fuels to fossil fuels, and investments into more efficient use of fossil fuels. (Little Meta) set up a quick reaction task force in Romania to deploy to Ukraine should Russia violates the Budapest Memorandum to safeguard non-proliferation.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6207895 >(Little Meta) set up a quick reaction task force in Romania to deploy to Ukraine should Russia violates the Budapest Memorandum to safeguard non-proliferation.
I'd rather not have any realpolitik in quest.
Anonymous
>>6207833 >Insulin >>6207872 >>6207895 Dude. Can we please play it normal and deal with the whole "terrorists murdered the entire government" thing before we implement your pet projects? It's 2008 and we're center left, which by 2024 would probably be center right. A ton of this stuff makes no sense for the MC. Also, I'm going to be the first one to point it out, the tripfagging is gay.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6207895 No, fuck off with the space force and romania. This is grounded US quest so deal with current 2000s issues only.
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
>>6207906 >2008 2012, actually. January 26th, specifically.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6207923 Oh, sorry, my bad. Forgot we timeskipped.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6207187 >”I can do ONE of those, and then we’d have a deal.” (Insulin bill) We don't need Alaska but we could call upon the citizens of the the other nonemergency states to be extra vigilant.
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
Quoted By:
I count 7 votes for >”I can do ONE of those, and then we’d have a deal.” (Insulin.) Locking in.
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
Quoted By:
You take the time it takes to wash your hands to think about your answer. By the time you’re wiping your hands dry and leaning your back against the sink, you’ve made up your mind. “I’ll get your insulin thing out there when I meet with Congress. I can’t possibly get you money, though. I am not gonna come off as giving preferential treatment.” Bernstein sighs and tosses his hands in the air, resigned. “I understand. Just deal with the insulin and I won’t be a thorn in your side.” He extends his hand forward, and you promptly shake it before you both walk out of the bathroom and back into the hallway chock full of governors and reporters, the latter of which hound you the moment you try to walk out. “Mr. President! A comment?” “Mr. President! Over here!” “Mr. President! Are you happy with how the meeting went?” You won’t get through this crowd of reporters until you either give them a comment to spin or the secret service forcefully clears a way through. You know this already. You lean into the nearest microphone of some three letter mainstream news. “We might not have gotten everyone on board, but we made some progress, and I’m happy with that.” The secret service begins clearing a path through for you, and the reporters are less resistant than they would’ve been had you not said anything. You’re swiftly escorted out of the building and into your car before being driven back to the White House. “Delaware, Vermont…what does that make it, 45 states?” You ponder having one of your assistants put out a statement asking the citizens of the states without a state of emergency to remain extra vigilant as you’re driven past the White House gates. You check your watch as you enter the Oval Office. It’s only noon. “Welcome back, hun. How’d the meeting go?” “Ehh…” You give your wife a quick kiss before you sit on the oval desk, feet hanging to the floor. “You get anything to eat yet?” “No, not yet. I’ll just ask the chefs to whip me up something real quick. I still got a long day ahead of me.” “Oh, I’m sure you do.” Meredith runs her hand across your cheek before she plants her lips on your forehead. “Just don’t work yourself to death in your first week, alright?” You nod. She walks off and you call up the kitchen. “Get me two club sandwiches, please. Oh, and a root beer.” A little while later, someone arrives with your lunch on a silver platter, literally. He places it on your desk before retreating out of the Oval Office. You quickly begin digging in, already thinking about your next course of action. You probably only have time to do one more meaningful thing today. (1/2)
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
>I need to get my cabinet in order. I can’t run this country alone, and god forbid something happens to me without any constitutionally established successor. >I need to meet with Congress soon, and especially before the senate is refilled. This is an opportunity I can’t pass up on to get some needed legislation passed. >I need my chief of staff to assemble a list of Supreme Court nominees. (Can be taken with another option. Feel free to specify what kind of nominees you’d want if you take this.) >Write-in. (2/2)
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
Quoted By:
Here’s an updated State of Emergency map, too.
Anonymous
>>6208194 >I need to meet with Congress soon, and especially before the senate is refilled. This is an opportunity I can’t pass up on to get some needed legislation passed. >I need my chief of staff to assemble a list of Supreme Court nominees. (Can be taken with another option. Feel free to specify what kind of nominees you’d want if you take this.) We should aim to get a helpful cabinet. I don't mean some democrat party yesmen or career politicians, but people who are NOT corrupt and DO want change.
Anonymous
>>6208207 Support.
Had there been any word on how our Allies and Rivals been acting in response to this crisis?
Anonymous
>>6208194 >>I need to get my cabinet in order. I can’t run this country alone, and god forbid something happens to me without any constitutionally established successor. Because playing with no heir is stupid.
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
>>6208218 Most major United States allies started taking precautions once the threat of future attacks was made by the MFSA. You’ve been receiving calls and public statements from many world leaders expressing their condolences and wishing you well. Most notably, President Lelukh Gennadiy and General Secretary Chang Wu of Russia and China respectively have also called to give their condolences and attempted to specify that they had no part in this. The President of Iraq, Abbaad al-Abdalla, has not attempted to communicate yet.
Anonymous
>>6208249 My god- the madmen have sunken Mexico/s
Anonymous
>>6208194 >I need to get my cabinet in order. I can’t run this country alone, and god forbid something happens to me without any constitutionally established successor. If we have a heart attack from the stress the entire country is screwed. We need to get a new line of succession before we start passing bills. We can also spin this in our favor (look, we care more about the country than partisan policy!).
>I need my chief of staff to assemble a list of Supreme Court nominees. (Can be taken with another option. Feel free to specify what kind of nominees you’d want if you take this.) Is the remaining Justice conservative or liberal? Regardless, I propose we pack the Court, but not so blatantly it tanks our credibility. Maybe something like 2-3 progressives, 2-3 center-lefts, 1-2 centrists, 1-2 center-right Justices (can adjust based on the surviving Justice). They should all be as qualified and scandal-free as possible.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6208194 >>I need to get my cabinet in order. I can’t run this country alone, and god forbid something happens to me without any constitutionally established successor. Anonymous
>>6208249 Holy shit Mexico got nuked so hard there aren't even islands left. Well at least we don't need to build the wall anymore and can slash border patrol's budget.
>>6208233 +1
Need to get the cabinet up and running and look into the Mexico incident and its refugees. Also Iraq you better say something soon or we will send in SFs to find out what you know.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6208259 >>6208267 Poor Panama's economy is going to be absolutely obliterated beyond recovery.
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
>>6208259 I didn’t see that before posting and frankly have no idea how that happened. My bad.
>>6208261 >Is the remaining Justice conservative or liberal? Calvin Murphy was nominated by Reagan. Take that as you wish.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6208277 Conservative, then. All the more reason to keep it ""balanced,"" so he won't kick up too much of a stink with the media.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6208277 All good, I like to imagine there’s some political aid having a panic attack due to doing the same thing.
Anonymous
>>6208277 Don't admit to mistakes roll with it. Now we got crazy worldbuilding over the disappearance of Mexico. We can send in the oil companies to tap into Mexico's ooiiilllll and buy up Panama property as they land value got wiped.
Anonymous
>>6208290 I bet you Mexico went to the same place as Nutucket went to.
Anonymous
>>6208194 >I need to get my cabinet in order. I can’t run this country alone, and god forbid something happens to me without any constitutionally established successor. >I need my chief of staff to assemble a list of Supreme Court nominees. (Can be taken with another option. Feel free to specify what kind of nominees you’d want if you take this.) Political moderates, at least one black lesbian. Anonymous
>>6208291 Those poor soul banished into the void to never be seen again.
>>6208207 >>6208218 >>6208261 >>6208304 Guys read we can only do one more topic so focus on cabinet first as we need the heir and do court next time.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6208309 >list of Supreme Court nominees. (Can be taken with another option. >Can be taken with another option. Lobbying Annon
Quoted By:
>>6208309 I change my vote to Cabinet
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6208194 >>I need to get my cabinet in order. I can’t run this country alone, and god forbid something happens to me without any constitutionally established successor. AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
Quoted By:
The cabinet + Supreme Court has it. Locking in.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
We need to make sure our cabinet is made of sustainably sourced lumber.
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
You pick up the phone to your personal secretary. “Get Rory in here.” You hang up and recline into your chair, hands locked together. Only a minute later, your chief of staff walks into the Oval Office. “Yes, sir?” “I need you to make me a list of nominees for the Supreme Court. The cabinet, too.” “On it.” Rory disappears out the door just as quickly as he came in, and before you have a chance to grab your pen and do some paperwork to pass the time, he’s already returned. “What is it?” “Here’s the list, sir.” “Huh? You literally just left.” “I had these prepared in advance.” Damnit, is everyone else just waiting on you? Maybe you’re the slow one here in Washington. “Thanks, then.” The folders are dropped on your desk and Rory walks out again, leaving you alone to look through your options. Before you do so, you pick up the phone again. “Don’t let anyone in unless it’s urgent.” You hang up the phone again, and only then do you direct all of your attention to the papers in front of you. You flip through each one of them, reading the names and seeing the faces that your chief of staff had decided most fit for these positions. You separate the judicial and executive appointments and place the former aside so you can first tackle the latter. You have 15 positions to fill, 14 of which need to be confirmed by the senate, and Rory gave you plenty of candidates for each of those positions. You suppose the first order of business is to determine what kind of cabinet you want.>I’ll just nominate the deputies. Luckily they’re all still alive and well and they’ve already gone through the senate before. It would be easy for them to do it again. We have these deputies in place for a reason. >If these people are going to be advising me on important issues, they need to be people I trust. The best way to ensure that is to make sure we both have the same personal policy. Moderate democrats all the way. >Now’s a good opportunity to give some concessions to the other side. I’ll nominate some republicans and a few progressive democrats to my cabinet. I need their good will. >Now more then ever we need competence in this country if we’re going to get through this. The people need to be assured that they’re in good hands if the rioting and market turmoil is going to be diminished any time soon. I’ll nominate the most qualified people to the cabinet. >Write-in. (1/2)
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
One specific position you want to take good care in picking out is the vice president. Thankfully, you just need to find someone willing. No senate confirmation necessary.>I need someone with experience in the legislative branch. Someone who knows the ins and outs of Congress and knows how to play it. Ashton Wells from Virginia retired from the senate not too long ago after serving for 24 years, and just in time too. He’d be a good helping hand, and I’m sure he wouldn’t mind adding “Vice President” to his Wikipedia page before retirement. >I need someone who’s an outsider. Someone who isn’t tainted by politics. Someone who can appeal to the populists, who I’m sure are asking for a lot more from me than the rest. Kieran Hayes is a very popular entrepreneur and is very open about his liberal views. A face like that in the White House would do wonders. >Write-in. Finally, you’ve tackled the executive branch. Now onto the judicial branch. You can imagine the uproar some people might be having over one man deciding over 8 different seats in the Supreme Court. Completely unprecedented. It’ll certainly be a very long time before the last of your appointments leaves the Supreme Court, years in the future. The one surviving justice, Calvin Murphy, is a staunch conservative so you’ll have to adjust your plans accordingly, depending on what those plans actually are.>I’m going to nominate nobody but liberals. This is a once in a lifetime opportunity to stack the court for decades to come, and I’m not going to pass it up. >Five liberals, three conservatives. 5-4 still gives me and my party a majority, but it’s a small enough majority to keep the Republicans docile. >Four liberals, three conservatives, one moderate. I’ll be as balanced and fair as I can be. It’d be wrong for me to use this court of law for political gain. >Why do I even need to think about this? Who cares what politics they have? I’m just going to pick who I think are the most qualified for this role. >Write-in. (2/2)
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6208708 >Now more then ever we need competence in this country if we’re going to get through this. The people need to be assured that they’re in good hands if the rioting and market turmoil is going to be diminished any time soon. I’ll nominate the most qualified people to the cabinet. Most qualified people *who are roughly on our side politically. I don't care how smart they are if they oppose all of our policy. I'm okay with anybody between progressive and RINO here, but nothing redder, and it should be supermajority Democrat (not that supermajority matters specifically for cabinet, just stating to give an idea).
>I need someone with experience in the legislative branch. Someone who knows the ins and outs of Congress and knows how to play it. Ashton Wells from Virginia retired from the senate not too long ago after serving for 24 years, and just in time too. He’d be a good helping hand, and I’m sure he wouldn’t mind adding “Vice President” to his Wikipedia page before retirement. We're wildly underqualified here. We need somebody we can trust to understand Washington, not another wildly underqualified person.
>Write-in. Four liberals, three moderates, one conservative. (I'd be willing to go up to 2 moderates / 2 conservatives if other people like that better.)
Anonymous
>>6208708 >Now more then ever we need competence in this country if we’re going to get through this. The people need to be assured that they’re in good hands if the rioting and market turmoil is going to be diminished any time soon. I’ll nominate the most qualified people to the cabinet. Competent people who aren't ridiculously corrupt. As opposed to the other anon, I don't actually care about their party - we want to LEAVE the retarded party system. If these people are competent, then they should be able to understand that following some retarded party mantra is beyond idiotic. The two party system is a disgrace and the sooner Aspen breaks down this moronic mass telltale-tier choice system the better.
>I need someone with experience in the legislative branch. Someone who knows the ins and outs of Congress and knows how to play it. Ashton Wells from Virginia retired from the senate not too long ago after serving for 24 years, and just in time too. He’d be a good helping hand, and I’m sure he wouldn’t mind adding “Vice President” to his Wikipedia page before retirement. Sounds good enough.
>Why do I even need to think about this? Who cares what politics they have? I’m just going to pick who I think are the most qualified for this role. Dear lord i hate this stupid fucking system. LE BLUE! LE RED! LE BLUE! LE RED! Aren't you people tired of just voting for party politicians because they share your team colors like this is a fucking football game?
Anonymous
>>6208732 Unless we radically change the Constitution (which requires 2/3rds state buy-in, we can't force it through even if we stack the courts and legislature), American politics are always going to tend toward having two parties. That's just built into the setup, because the Founding Fathers were working with the info about democracy they had at the time, which was next to nothing. Even if we go full George Washington and attempt to rule partyless, I guarantee that within a decade things will be back to usual. Check out the book "How Democratic is the American Constitution?", it's short and accessible and talks about all of this.
Anonymous
>>6208773 Additionally, I'd like to point out that we are, to an extent, playing a character, and so far our guy has shown 0 interest in blowing up the entire system. Much the opposite, given how boring and moderate he is.
Anonymous
>>6208773 >>6208776 So what, we're just forced to play as a boring career politician whose main goals are maintaining the status quo? I thought this was 'Deisgnated Survivor' quest, not 'Designated Golem' quest
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6208776 President Foster the type-a fella to have his wife say he didn't order pickles on his burger. Maybe his VP should be a real firebrand.
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
You can vote for some more unorthodox decisions, such as deciding to run as an independent or what have you, as long you don’t try to outlaw the missionary position or declare nuclear war on Ecuador or anything. Aspen was a middling moderate for most of his life, and that will definitely have an effect, but these are interesting times so interesting ideas are allowed.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6208708 >Now more then ever we need competence in this country if we’re going to get through this. The people need to be assured that they’re in good hands if the rioting and market turmoil is going to be diminished any time soon. I’ll nominate the most qualified people to the cabinet. >>6208709 >Nominate a head of an Indian Reservation that you have good relations with. >Stack it with judges that support strengthening the executive branch, it doesn't matter if they're outsiders to the Republican-Democrat dual party system. I know these aren't gonna win lmao
Anonymous
>>6208782 >or declare nuclear war on Ecuador or anything Correct, you cannot declare war on SOMETHING THAT DOESN'T EXIST. Have you ever heard LITERALLY ANYTHING about this 'Equator'? Have you met someone from it? Of course not! NOBODY HAS! That's because it's not a real country.
The real question is, what did they hide there?
Anonymous
>>6208709 >Now more then ever we need competence in this country if we’re going to get through this. The people need to be assured that they’re in good hands if the rioting and market turmoil is going to be diminished any time soon. I’ll nominate the most qualified people to the cabinet. We need intelligence not weak willed or corrupt bankers now.
>I need someone with experience in the legislative branch. Someone who knows the ins and outs of Congress and knows how to play it. Ashton Wells from Virginia retired from the senate not too long ago after serving for 24 years, and just in time too. He’d be a good helping hand, and I’m sure he wouldn’t mind adding “Vice President” to his Wikipedia page before retirement. While an outsider is a welcome change untainted by politics we will need a guiding hand to wrangle the new Congress in line.
>Why do I even need to think about this? Who cares what politics they have? I’m just going to pick who I think are the most qualified for this role. We either going to make the most balanced and skilled supreme court or have them locked in forever stalemates. Either way anything that does get passed will be highly advance and skilled writings of the century.
>>6208782 I have never heard of this ecuador. Is it the same mythological area called Mexico?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6208776 We were boring as we were just in charge of forests and now that the government got snapped the power has overtaken him. Power has corrupted our status quo to make real change for the government.
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:T5lIjrx1 Thu 06 Mar 2025 23:18:22 No. 6208801 Report >>6208795 Support.
>>6208782 Would it also be safe to assume that the majority of our topics as a politician had been eviormental/state level related?
What someone’s opinion on dealing with terrorism can be on the different category than their opinion on recycling.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6208708 >Now more then ever we need competence in this country if we’re going to get through this. The people need to be assured that they’re in good hands if the rioting and market turmoil is going to be diminished any time soon. I’ll nominate the most qualified people to the cabinet. Zakenkabinet? Funny
>>6208709 >I need someone with experience in the legislative branch. Someone who knows the ins and outs of Congress and knows how to play it. Ashton Wells from Virginia retired from the senate not too long ago after serving for 24 years, and just in time too. He’d be a good helping hand, and I’m sure he wouldn’t mind adding “Vice President” to his Wikipedia page before retirement. We can always drop him for the re-election campaign assuming we run again if needed if we want someone more populist. He sounds pretty old and maybe not the type to get offended by that.
>Why do I even need to think about this? Who cares what politics they have? I’m just going to pick who I think are the most qualified for this role. I would personally prefer at least one obvious liberal just so that we can have a floor of one vote in our pocket if needed, but if we are serious about cleaning up Washington I think it has to start here. The court becoming a party institution has been cancerous.
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
Quoted By:
>>6208790 >The real question is, what did they hide there? They illegally traffick the missionary position from there. Terrible, terrible stuff.
>>6208801 > Would it also be safe to assume that the majority of our topics as a politician had been eviormental/state level related? Before joining the late president’s cabinet, you only made an impact in Colorado. After, yes, you’ve mostly been focused on national parks and Indian reservations.
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:uqwiPknU Thu 06 Mar 2025 23:35:22 No. 6208810 Report >>6208801 I bet with the Park and Indian services we can find who would be the best pick easily
hopefully they don’t roll a nat one and decide to tour the reservations like we almost did Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6208810 >I bet with the Park and Indian services we can find who would be the best pick easily A vice-president from the parks department you say? I think i've got just the guy...
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Obviously, we should nominate a tree to the supreme court, in order to best represent the interest of this great nation's arboreal citizens.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6208708 >>Now more then ever we need competence in this country if we’re going to get through this. The people need to be assured that they’re in good hands if the rioting and market turmoil is going to be diminished any time soon. I’ll nominate the most qualified people to the cabinet. >I need someone who’s an outsider. Someone who isn’t tainted by politics. Someone who can appeal to the populists, who I’m sure are asking for a lot more from me than the rest. Kieran Hayes is a very popular entrepreneur and is very open about his liberal views. A face like that in the White House would do wonders. >Why do I even need to think about this? Who cares what politics they have? I’m just going to pick who I think are the most qualified for this role. Anonymous
Quoted By:
You know, if Foster is going to appoint people to solve the crisis at hand he's a dogshit politician. Doesn't he know you should never let a tragedy go to waste? Ugh, he's playing the game wrong.
Anonymous
>>6208709 >If these people are going to be advising me on important issues, they need to be people I trust. The best way to ensure that is to make sure we both have the same personal policy. Moderate democrats all the way. A question to consider: what does "qualified" even mean? Business leaders, professors, and long time bureaucrats are all considered highly "qualified" and very "competent" but they are also considered stupid, evil, and corrupt. Think Tank members are also highly qualified with many degrees, papers, and "expert" analysis but they're also fully partisan and ideological. For another example of a "competent" person, Robert McNamara was a genius at Ford and probably the smartest guy in JFK's cabinet but look at what good that did. And, say, someone may be an amazing Chicago school economist but he's no use if deregulating everything isn't actually the answer or something we want to do.
>I need someone with experience in the legislative branch. Someone who knows the ins and outs of Congress and knows how to play it. Ashton Wells from Virginia retired from the senate not too long ago after serving for 24 years, and just in time too. He’d be a good helping hand, and I’m sure he wouldn’t mind adding “Vice President” to his Wikipedia page before retirement. >Write-in: I’m going to nominate nobody but MODERATE liberals. This is a once in a lifetime opportunity to stack the court for decades to come, and I’m not going to pass it up. >>6208778 No, you don't understand, it's time to start a cult of personality around being the most boring moderate liberal alive. When the both the countryside and the cities rise in revolt, we'll purge them both and turn the nation into only suburbia and national parks. Aspen is another word for Poplar (or you could say: popular) tree after all, and the tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6208939 >Aspen is another word for Poplar He will be the most poplar president ever
Anonymous
>>6208708 >Now more then ever we need competence in this country if we’re going to get through this. The people need to be assured that they’re in good hands if the rioting and market turmoil is going to be diminished any time soon. I’ll nominate the most qualified people to the cabinet. The cabinets should be as close to a meritocracy as possible. No random ass Senators who have nothing to do with the job.
>>I’m going to nominate nobody but liberals. This is a once in a lifetime opportunity to stack the court for decades to come, and I’m not going to pass it up. This is running the most powerful country on Earth, not a game of sports where being even handed is a value in of itself. We are playing a person who believes there perspective is whats best for the USA. If they truly believe that, they should want people who share that perspective in power.
>Nominate a head of an Indian Reservation that you have good relations with. I like this a lot.
Anonymous
>>6208939 >>6208963 I'll back packing the court if nobody wants my write-in. Also, in regards to nominating only the "most qualified" Justices... there's probably hundreds if not thousands of extraordinarily qualified judges out there, and we have to pick eight of them. We have to distinguish between the pack somehow, and picking "uhh just most qualified I guess" is sticking your head in the sand. Pick a balanced court instead if that's what you actually want.
Anonymous
>>6208973 Packing the court with your party people is a trap. The pico-second you deviate from the party mantra they will come down on you like a thunder. Enjoy not being able to do anything whatsoever unless it benefits DA PART
Most qualified should mean people who are willing to pass laws that don't follow whatever roleplay role their party has.
Anonymous
>>6208997 It doesn't have to be "Democrats" or Dem establishment people, but it should absolutely be majority judges with liberal values, even if they're Independents or whatever. Our one established trait is that we're a liberal with, presumably, liberal values. If we nominate a bunch of judges who don't share those values (to "own the establishment" with our lack of regard for politics), and then they proceed to never pass Obergefell or kill Roe v. Wade a decade early, then we're not being cool and anti-party, we're just being incredibly stupid.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6208998 You're going very hard on being a liberal when the QM has stated we aren't forced to follow some specific path
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6208997 That's not how USA politics works. You can look up via records that Court nominees appointed by Presidents of the same party consistently back Presidents of the same party, even if they were nominated by someone else. Even if it goes against previous party doctrine because in the US the President determines party doctrine (there have been several major party-wide doctrine shifts that became mainstream for the party because the President was behind them see Trump, LBJ, FDR, and Reagan.
A Supreme Cort screwing over a Potus who appointed them is a scarce thing, ESPECIALLY if you nominate 8 of them.
The worst it will get is they will rule against us on some minor cases to look good, but for the REAL big stuff, hand us the keys.
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
Quoted By:
Meritocratic cabinet, Ashton Wells for VP, meritocratic Supreme Court. Locking in.
>>6208939 In this case, “most qualified” means you’re going to nominate the people you think have the best record for a specific position. For instance, your Secretary of Treasury would be someone who has a proven history of being good managing a budget or the Secretary of State would be someone who has a successful record in international affairs.
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
A few hours have passed, and your whiteboard looks completely indiscernible from a Jackson Pollock painting. It’s impressive, really. If someone is to walk in on this, they’d think you’ve gone mad. You wouldn’t blame them, either. But no, you haven’t gone insane just yet. You’re still just painfully unprepared for the trials and tribulations of what’s to come for the remainder of your presidency. Eventually, you have narrowed down the list of potential candidates for each position down to one each. It became quite easy once you figured out what you wanted. Merit. This isn’t the time to be playing politics. This is the time for rebuilding. You cannot afford anything but the best for your team and the best for the highest court in the land. You hastily wipe off the excess marker on the white board, leaving only the names and chosen positions up and legible. You walk over to the phone to your assistant. “Get me Ashton Wells on the phone.” ~ JANUARY 27 2012 ~ The rest of yesterday was spent calling each of the people you deemed most qualified and best suited for each role, and after a long conversation with every one of them, you managed to get all of your first choices on board. And now, after just an hour ago watching Ashton Wells be sworn in as the 48th Vice President of the United States in your Oval Office, you’re now in the senate chamber to watch your new cabinet be confirmed and subsequently sworn in. When you and the rest of the late president’s cabinet were in the process of being confirmed four years ago, you were subject to much more scrutiny than this. But now, everyone is simply going through the motions and speeding the process along. One after the other, your cabinet picks are confirmed unanimously, with only the occasional 4-1. The same goes for your Supreme Court nominees, with only the tiniest amount more scrutiny, considering they are for life, but nevertheless they are all confirmed with ease as well. Turns out that having a democratic supermajority can be really helpful when you only need 3 votes. Speaking of which, today is the last day you will be able to meet with the senate before the seats are being refilled. You already got word yesterday that the governors of 10 states have secured authorization from their legislature to appoint replacements, with more surely on the way. You’ve invited the 21 congresspeople to their chamber as well, so now is your only chance to push any urgent legislation you need before one of the chambers is replenished. >I will push for…(Write-in.) >I don’t need to push for anything. At least not immediately. You recall the deal you made with Governor Bernstein. Will you uphold your end of the deal?>Yes. I will get an insulin bill passed. >No, I won’t be doing that.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6209160 I'm not sure what to write in (this isn't a vote either way for that choice), but obviously
>Yes. I will get an insulin bill passed. It wouldn't do to break our promises.
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:OPEM/KUz Fri 07 Mar 2025 19:52:07 No. 6209170 Report >>Write in; Emergency Continuation of Governance Bill; in the event of a total lost of succession, the State goverments would appoint a emergency head of state who would hold onto power until a emergency election can be held. This is mainly because the USA was a chocked donut away from being without leadership. Push the Insulin Bill.
Anonymous
>>6209160 >I will push for the authorization of a new National Park on one of the sites we found earlier and dedicate it to Barrett Larson and all of the other people who died. What could possibly go wrong? >Yes. I will get an insulin bill passed. >>6209170 This bill is just asking for future masterminds to try decapitation strikes the moment the majority of governors and the president are of different parties. Assuming the governors here are the same party as in real life in 2011, there are 29 Republican, 20 Democrats, and 1 independent governors. So if the mastermind IS in fact an angry neocon / tea partier we WILL get blown up.
Anonymous
>>6209184 Larson National Park sounds like a nice, uncontroversial pick. But that's precisely why we shouldn't push for it right now - it would probably be easy enough to get through a more full congress.
I think you're right about avoiding decapitation strikes, though.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6209187 >But that's precisely why we shouldn't push for it right now Good point, I retract my vote then.
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:jfeSf7VP Fri 07 Mar 2025 20:34:15 No. 6209203 Report Quoted By:
>>6209184 Your right.
I maintain in Insulin Vote.
I change my Bill vote to the National Park one.
>>6209184 Anonymous
Do we really not have a single idea of an law we want to pass while congress is basically ours?
Anonymous
>>6209220 >tfw all those "lets get shit PASSED while we have the chance!" guys were blowing smoke I mean, it sounds on brand for politics.
Anonymous
>>6209221 I'm not an american so I can't say diddly squat about the laws in the time to even know what we could chcange, so I kinda needed actual ameri-anons to...y'know, think of something. But our best ideas is making a national park, I guess.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6209221 I'm an American, but I haven't bothered with politics for years because it's not like I can personally change anything irl.
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:T5lIjrx1 Fri 07 Mar 2025 21:24:18 No. 6209226 Report …. We could repeal the SOLs, end Zero Tolerance, and revamp how liability works. Maybe also repeal the laws that basically make it so that kids can’t go outside like children without parents at risk of being arrested.
Anonymous
>>6209226 Got anything that might be actually useful for us in our coming times? Something that would be hard to pass normally without bribing fifty different people?
Anonymous
>>6209228 Hang on there buster, the American system has no bribery. We have lobbying. COMPLETELY DIFFERENT***** I promise, totally.
Anonymous
>>6209230 Actually, revamping bribery and stock trading laws might be a good one to try to pass...but good luck getting the congresspeople to ever agree to it.
Anonymous
>>6209231 Yeah. Repeal all that "Oh we're government officials, we can't be charged with insider trading!" shit. That's the dream right there.
Anonymous
>>6209232 That would be real nice, but it feels like a good way to get every single congress man to hate you from day 1. We don't have enough populist support to do it.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
We could meme and do something about trees. Give the national park service a military budget "to stop poachers"?
Anonymous
>>6209222 I think an election reform bill would be a solid "continuation fo democracy" bit.
Make election day national holiday, cap outside money in politics , and incentivize states to encourage voting by rewarding them for higher turnout. That sort of thing.
Anonymous
>>6209235 The previous post said we have ton of populist support though.
And besides we have a deep control fo congress right now. If that passed the new congress would look like hueg self serving assholes to repeal it even if they wanted to voting for it would be tantamount o admitting you want to do insider trading.
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:0FWr09av Fri 07 Mar 2025 22:16:23 No. 6209249 Report >>6209245 Honestly I support this proposal.
We need to give it a catchy name- maybe the ‘’Accountability Bill’’. Maybe we can rope the Vermont governor to advocate for it?
Anonymous
>>6209247 If we think we can actually get a reform bill passed, I'm all for it.
Anonymous
>>6209249 I don't think we could get him in without a quid-pro-quo, and we don't have any leverage on him at the moment.
>captcha: TAX2DA DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:TZS17P/U Fri 07 Mar 2025 22:33:24 No. 6209253 Report Quoted By:
>>6209251 ‘’Support this and you can gloat about it during re-election’’.
Truthfully it would be a long shot- then again. Why would he want the Insulin bill passed?
Anonymous
>>6209249 Spitballing
The "Save America Act?"
"Save Democracy act"
"Save the Republic Act'
"The Republic Act"
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6209250 We have a Senate supermajority, I think the only real barrier will be whipping like 6 congresspeople, which shouldn't be that hard given the enormous unique circumstances we have. (Whipping means to influence legislatures to vote a certain way.)
Anonymous
>>6209262 That sounds dumb anon, it doesn't say anything. Might as well say 'The Good Act'
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:Gz0QtR7+ Fri 07 Mar 2025 23:10:19 No. 6209266 Report >>6209264 We could name it after the president that was killed
Anonymous
>>6209160 >Yes. I will get an insulin bill passed. >Write-in: Push for restrictions on lobbying and gift giving to congressmen. Some other ideas I have is improving worker safety regulations, increase penalties and punishments to companies that do insider trading or tax evasion, get more money for infrastructure, and place a limit on congress terms so they don't sit there for life.
Anonymous
>>6209266 Doesn't really make sense unless it's something related to it. If we're just doing some act about lobbying restrictions it should just be Accountability Act, if it's an 'promote democracy' then it should be the Participation Act.
Anonymous
>>6209264 That is literally the kind of bill names that are the norm. As a matter of fact, you will often see bills with happy preachy names that if you actually examine do the exact opposite of the name of the bill. It's really common to have a positive name on something that slips in some fucked up shit. Like the Patriot act letting the NSA spy on anyone they want with no probably cause and shit. You wouldn't want to vote against the "Patriot" act would you? You love your country, right? It hinges on the politicians not wanting to get smeared by the media which is often bought out, or the politicians simply not reading the actual bill and going along with it.
tl:dr, bills are often given names unrelated to what they really want
Anonymous
>>6209272 Well, then let`s *not* do that.
Also, add to the list: repel the patriot act. That'll probably be a second (First, technically?) term thing.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6209268 Accountability Act sounds good.
'accountability' has a positive connotation, and it's related to the idea of our bill.
Anonymous
>>6209274 Nah I totally want to push a bill that is actually called "The Good Guy Bill" now kek
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:3hE0LG2F Sat 08 Mar 2025 00:17:35 No. 6209302 Report Quoted By:
>>6209267 I change my vote to this
Anonymous
>>6209160 >Yes. I will get an insulin bill passed. >I will push for…(Write-in.) >Push for restrictions on lobbying and gift giving to congressmen. >Improving worker safety regulations, increase penalties and punishments to companies that do insider trading or tax evasion, get more money for infrastructure, and place a limit on congress terms so they don't sit there for life. And generally trying to repel the Patriot Act as a long term thing.
"Save the Republic Act" sounds realistic enough, though having it called "The Good Guy Act" sounds amazing lol
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:qBPfFoYW Sat 08 Mar 2025 02:33:57 No. 6209360 Report Quoted By:
>>6209355 I could see ‘’the good guy act’’ being a joke that got leaked as the actual name of the bill.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6209278 The"Giving Organizations Operational Developing Government Utility? Yes! " Bill.
Anonymous
>>6209278 Folks joke but I think "Good Guy" Act may be good branding.
It plays into the nice guy moderate likeable image of our MC
Anonymous
>>6209367 >tfw all the legislation pushed by foster becomes some "positive" spin >good guy bill >humble man bill >caretaker bill >homecoming act >got the milk ordinance And none of it is coming from the President himself, it's just the aides talking to media. Optics everywhere kek
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:0cTrbyy/ Sat 08 Mar 2025 03:13:02 No. 6209375 Report >>6209370 I mean isn’t that what we kinda are? Presidential aids?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6209375 I like to think of myself like Presidential herpes personally.
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:qBPfFoYW Sat 08 Mar 2025 16:50:06 No. 6209571 Report Do we have anything Blackmail worthy about ourselves as a politician?
Anonymous
>>6209571 I can't imagine it. Aspen has been repeatedly described as just about as milquetoast moderate as they come.
Before going mad with power as the President, at least.
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:qBPfFoYW Sat 08 Mar 2025 16:55:18 No. 6209574 Report Quoted By:
>>6209572 Unless we are active on 4Chan.
Then again that would get us the anonymous vote
Anonymous
>>6209571 A video of us pooping in the woods taken by some creeper.
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
Quoted By:
No update today.
>>6209571 Not particularly.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6209655 >I dunno man, that looks like a bear. They kind of just do that out there. Anonymous
Anonymous
>>6209245 >election reform bill This! Oh god this - we’ll never get another chance
Basically look at Australia and implement all of the following:
>Election day is now a national public holiday >Create an independent, non-partisan electoral commission whose job it is to draw Federal congressional boundaries >Implement ranked choice voting for Federal elections >Implement compulsory voting for Federal elections >Require real-time donation disclosures to Federal candidates >Ban foreign donations >Require all states to offer 2 weeks of early voting (in addition to postal voting) for Federal elections >Ban elected congressmen and senators from owning shares or bonds >Remove the ability of the President to unilaterally pardon people for crimes >Create an independent, non-partisan National Anti-Corruption Commission with the power to hold public hearings >Strengthen whistleblower laws There is a list of democratic and accountability reforms which could become an omnibus Bill.
Anonymous
>>6209833 I could get behind some of that:
>Election day is now a national public holiday. >Require real-time donation disclosures to Federal candidates >Ban foreign donations >Require all states to offer 2 weeks of early voting (in addition to postal voting) for Federal elections >Ban elected congressmen and senators from owning shares or bonds >Strengthen whistleblower laws I don't believe anything stays independant and nonpartisan.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6209833 >We should just create an anti corruption police Anonymous
>>6209861 I can get behind most of that, but I feel like early and postal voting provides too much potential for fraud.
Should be one citizen, one vote, with federally-recognized id (driver's license, passport, etc) in hand at the time of voting.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6209833 >>Create an independent, non-partisan National Anti-Corruption Commission with the power to hold public hearings This, inevitably, fails. Or is itself corrupted. The power should always be with the people to remove corruption when necessary. Creating any overseeing board or group will always lead to issues. There will never be true impartiality or purity in government because the ones running any government are people and inherently flawed.
No single group should hold the power to indict like that unless that group is the entirety of the citizenry. And trying to make a group out of them can lead to ignorant people making decisions without comprehending the finer points of what they are judging.
Or you know, more legislation eventually leads to thought and secret police. Which is bad. The CIA is shitty enough to deal with, imagine the Stazi on top of that.
Anonymous
>>6209861 This is me.
>>6209869 Deal. Mandatory voter ID is a great idea.
Anonymous
>>6209869 >>6209909 Mandatory voter ID also requires the American DMVs to not be ass and open on weekends or past 5pm so people actually have time to get IDs. They're only open Monday-Friday 8am to 5pm and waiting at one takes forever!
Anonymous
>>6209925 We do that? Gauranteed re-election.
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:d/kRg2Yj Sun 09 Mar 2025 01:45:23 No. 6209929 Report >>6209927 I think we might need to do a Revote.
Anonymous
>>6209925 >>6209927 >foster makes the dmv not a soul sucking experience that makes you want to commit a crime(s) >approval rating hits 97% the day after Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6209929 We really just need to compile everyone's suggestions so far and decide what we do and do not want in the bill.
Anonymous
>>6209930 How CAN we make DMVs not ass? They're a state-run thing, so is there any way to force them to open longer and in more places?
>inb4 our "qualified" supreme court justices strike down DMV legislation for interfering with states rights Getting a passport takes like 2 fucking months too, but at least for those can apply by mail.
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:sjZwx/CN Sun 09 Mar 2025 02:09:29 No. 6209944 Report Quoted By:
>>6209940 Maybe instead we make a Federal ID or revamp Passports into a Federal ID/comes with one? We just improve the pas port system- maybe make it so that you get one automatically when you apply for the draft?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6209940 Only thing I could think of is make a federal alternative that prioritizes efficiency. Not to replace the typical system or anything. Which is probably a bad idea. Get a state ID but a national driver's license. Then you can drive and get around but you'd need to get a state ID for services that are owned by the states. Naturally, this will lead to more problems and huge bottlenecks. But at least with an actual competitive entity the states would need to actually get shit moving or else people would be paying for Feddie Licenses instead of normal ones. There goes a not insignificant chunk of revenue. Because IDs cost substantially less to get as a citizen than a driver's license. And since it is a federal service it'll just get funded by taxes which will make it seem free to people who don't get how taxes work. Imagine the optics of dumb people saying "It's a free driver's license!". Hilarious.
I want to reiterate, again, this is a bad idea lel Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6209833 Everything but the anti-corruption commission as that will turn corrupt. Or if we have to establish one have it target a specific issue by popular vote and attempt to fix it. Staffed by people that lost their homes to recessions, lost pensions to insider trading, healthcare claim denials, or had their water contaminated by industrial pollution. Less experienced staff but they will be much more spiteful to business interests.
Also QM we probably need another vote for the write in proposals as we are getting a lot of ideas now that the power went to our MC's head.
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
Okay, so I think I managed to compile the ideas that people liked or at least didn’t dislike enough to object to. Don’t worry about it being too much, since I plan on purging some of them. You’ll see how soon.>Pass the Insulin Bill. >End Zero Tolerance. >End Standards of Learning. >Restrictions on lobbying and gift-giving to Congress. >Repeal the Patriot Act. >Improve work safety regulation. >Increase penalties to companies that perform insider trading or tax evasion. >More money for infrastructure. >Congressional term limits. >Make Election Day a national holiday. >Change federal elections to ranked-choice voting. >Compulsory voting for federal elections. >Require real-time donation disclosures to federal candidates. >Ban foreign donations. >Require all states to offer 2 weeks of early voting and voting by-mail. >Ban elected congressmen and senators from owning shares or bonds. >Abolish unilateral presidential pardons. >Strengthen whistleblower laws. >Mandatory voter ID. If I missed anything or any of these votes were retracted, let me know before I explain how we’ll bring this number down to something a little more reasonable.
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:cso7CVlC Sun 09 Mar 2025 18:26:05 No. 6210303 Report Quoted By:
>>6210289 >> Insulin >End Zero Tolerance. >End Standards of Learning. >Restrictions on lobbying and gift-giving to Congress. >Repeal the Patriot Act. >Make Election Day a national holiday. (For Essential Workers, they have to have one of the days off to be able to vote) >Ban elected congressmen and senators from owning shares or bonds. >Mandatory voter ID. (I am in support of the ‘’it comes with signing up for the Draft’’ proposal) Anonymous
>>6210289 Man, I don't know half these laws. Zelo Tolerance? Standards of Learning? The hell is that?
I suppose this is a quest for americans, but still..
Anonymous
>>6210304 And before someone says 'just search', I *tried*, but literally all I found was some shit about DA ORANGE MAN when the quest is set in 2012
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:qBPfFoYW Sun 09 Mar 2025 18:46:32 No. 6210317 Report >>6210305 >>6210304 Zero Tolerance; basically, if a kid decides to beat the snot out of another kid, both kids get punished.
SOLs; a series of standardized tests that was intended to better the educational system. What happened was that schools began to educate to pass the test instead of actually providing a good education.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6210317 I see. Alright.
Now let's try to be smart about this. Anyway, we're going to actually be cutting down on that list, right? Or are we already voting?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6210304 You'd probably have better results looking up "No Child Left Behind policy". The short version is schools were pressured to increase graduation rates. The long is that since everything in this world is easier on shortcuts most schools simply lowered standards or outright lied on student's competency and passed them even if they failed, ironically leading to drastically reduced education across the board. The problem, as is typical with legislation, is that a catchy name was attached to it which if you opposed made you sound like an asshole. And American politicians treat their job like a fucking popularity contest more often than something actually important.
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
>>6210304 Zero Tolerance means that you’ll be given a certain sentence for a certain crime, regardless of your individual circumstances.
I’m not quite sure what Anon meant by SOLs, but I’m assuming he’s referring to something like the No Child Left Behind Act.
Anonymous
>>6210326 >regardless of your individual circumstances. I would hope anons have a way to avoid this from turning into Europe's "We let this rapist go free because his kid likes the chicken nuggets from our country and would be sad if they were deported"
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:qBPfFoYW Sun 09 Mar 2025 19:14:27 No. 6210332 Report Quoted By:
>>6210331 I would imagine that it wouldn’t go into effect immediately, giving the Department of Education time to think of something or for state governments to propose and implement solutions.
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
Alright, locking the previously listed choices in, then. Here’s how we’re gonna knock some of them off. Gimme a d19. 1 for each option. Best of three.
>>6210326 >>6210317 Looks like we had different ideas for what Zero Tolerance meant. Since it’s your suggestion, I’ll be going with your definition.
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:qBPfFoYW Sun 09 Mar 2025 19:17:46 No. 6210334 Report Quoted By:
>>6210333 I mean- both definitions are not wrong, just that my example is what I am more familiar with from experience.
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:qBPfFoYW Sun 09 Mar 2025 19:19:02 No. 6210335 Report Quoted By:
Rolled 17 (1d19) >>6210333 Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
Can I just say we really shouldn't go for the patriot act thing so goddamn early? We're going to get JFK'd
Anonymous
Rolled 9 (1d19) >>6210333 >>6210340 With the massive upheaval of the government, if the CIA wanted to do an internal gayop right now it would be beyond stupid. If there was even a whiff of glowie involvement the conspiracy theorists would fish it out and parade it and the CIA would get fucking obliterated. This is probably the only time where the glowtards actually would need to sit on their hands because everyone is already going to be looking at them to fix the terror issue.
I'd be more worried about pushback from everyone else saying "We NEED to check everyone right now. Let's wait until AFTER the crisis has passed." which inevitably turns into "let's keep it forever". Like all "wartime" measures.
Anonymous
>>6210364 I mean, argument wise, you could very easily say Patriot Act is worthless because it didn't stop the literal one thing it was supposed to.
Anonymous
>>6210368 Absolutely. It's just that they'll double down and suggest EXTRA PATRIOTISM kek. They'll totally just jockey for power. Which is why Foster needs to get huge popular support. Eventually it just can't be ignored when the Treeman speaks, the shrubbery masses listen.
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:BOiAwK96 Sun 09 Mar 2025 20:27:47 No. 6210377 Report >>6210374 Honestly that is why I lumped together the other things.
‘’why do you want corruption in Washington?’’
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
>17/19. Huh, alright. Not bad. Time to vote again. This time, you’ll be voting to remove 2 of the options presented here. Whichever 2 options receive the most votes will be removed from this list. If there’s a tie, then both tied options will be removed as well.
>>6210289 Apologies if you were hoping for an official update today. I wasn’t expecting so many suggestions. Not that I’m upset over that, of course. Quite the opposite.
Anonymous
>>6210377 >"You want bad actors in the state, do you?" >who wants to be a millionaire background theme plays >>6210391 If I had to pick two to get rid of. Shit. Maybe
>More money for infrastructure >Ban foreign donations As long as people know where the donations are coming from they can slander the fuck out of people for taking outsider money. Not ideal but eh.
As for the infrastructure money, it hurts, but most of the time the government doesn't need to throw more money at a problem but stop letting contractors fleece the fuck out of them. We really just need to stop letting the people who make the deals say "fuck it have whatever you're asking for" like they normally do and instead fight for a decent price. Some of it is laziness, some of it is incompetence, and some of it is corruption. We just need to get on top of that some time.
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:oRX+ciQ7 Sun 09 Mar 2025 21:01:39 No. 6210409 Report Quoted By:
Anonymous
>>6210289 I’ll vote to get rid of:
>Congressional term limits. >Repeal the Patriot Act. Having experienced people in Congress is good (given that we’re removing avenues of corruption)
Beyond that, I don’t think rolling back national security legislation post a major terrorist attack would be popular - most citizens would probably think we’ve lost it.
Anonymous
>>6210391 >Repeal the Patriot Act. >Abolish unilateral presidential pardons. If I'm not mistaken, pardons are in the Constitution, so changing this is likely more trouble than it's worth.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6210430 To my understanding the "unilateral" is the operative word there. Which means no more "I say, therefore pardon". Not that there would be no more pardons, it'd just be something that has to be floated by the court after the president initiates it. Though I can see how that isn't ideal either.
Anonymous
>>6210430 You are correct it seems.
Federal pardons in the United States are granted only by the President, pursuant to their authority under the Constitution to grant "reprieves and pardons for offenses against the United States.”
The pardon power is considered "plenary" and thus generally cannot be restricted or modified by Congress or the judiciary. In Ex parte Garland (1867), the US Supreme Court confirmed the "unlimited" nature of federal pardons (except for impeachment related crimes) and broadened its scope to include offenses for which legal proceedings have not been initiated.
Given this, I’ll change my vote here
>>6210422 to be:
>Repeal the Patriot Act. >Abolish unilateral presidential pardons. Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6210489 You know if the pardoning thing is as stated in the constitution then we couldn't actually do anything about it in terms of actual abolishment since that would need to come from the states themselves voting in overwhelming majority to change the constitution so it probably shouldn't even be on the docket in the first place as presented by Aspen. So there might be some funnery going on right now.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6210430 I'll support this one.
Better to table the pardons ourselves before having an aide or senator do it for us.
I think congressional term limits might be good to remove if we're removing corruption, but I agree with
>>6210422 's logic on the patriot act, and it seems to be the more popular option.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6210430 Yeah I'll support this.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6209833 Several of these wont be legal without a conditional amendment . if we had packed the court we probably could have had out rigged justices let them through but for now we have to cut
>Implement compulsory voting for Federal elections >Remove the ability of the President to unilaterally pardon people for crimes Everything else should be good to go.
Anonymous
>>6209869 >early and postal voting provides too much potential for fraud. The USA massively expanded early and postal voting for COVID and fraud was statistically nonexistent.
Several states in the Union already have very high levels of early and mail voting (like Nevada) and again, basically no fraud.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6210331 >Europe's "We let this rapist go free because his kid likes the chicken nuggets from our country and would be sad if they were deported" Has that actually happened?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6210550 Nevada had less fraud last time because all the White folks went to vote at the eldery community centers instead of the closer local hood ass community centers. It was nice knowing my vote wouldn't "get lost" this time.
Anonymous
We should probably make our choices based on what Foster knows and thinks rather than what we know. It's not hard to believe someone would see there is more *potential* for fraud in a remote system that is decentralized and want to take steps against that out of worry for the future despite if it works fine or not today. And I'd rather avoid getting too caught up in our actual real world politics and end up having a jannie say we've gone full /pol/ and have some of us get put in the cuck corner.
Anonymous
>>6210581 GAS THE JEWS! RACE WAR NOW!
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
>>6210550 Deliberate voter fraud is very uncommon in the US.
Part of the problem is that election officials are localised and there are no standard rules for voting / ballots / counting across the county.
An independent, non-partisan electoral commission whose job it is to draw Federal congressional boundaries and administer elections + voterID would prevent basically 100% of fraud cases.
Look at the Australian Electoral Commission as a case study
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6210374 Ah so repeal the patriot act later when we have more popular support.
>>6210422 No do not get rid of congress limits. We need those crones out of congress to allow real up to date legislation to actually push forward.
>>6210391 >Repeal the Patriot Act. >Abolish unilateral presidential pardons. Both to be taken off the list
To be removed from the list. I hate the patriot act but anon is right as the population is not ready to get rid of placebo after losing the government but we can come back later to get rid of it.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6210391 >Repeal the Patriot Act. >Abolish unilateral presidential pardons. Anonymous
>>6210602 I agree re: the independent electoral commission. You legally can outright run state elections but you can set up standards they have to obey (like what the Voting Rights Acts did)
If you want to mandate voter ID that has to be paired with making ids overwhelmingly accessible, otherwise you are blocking voters, not encouraging them.
About 11 percent of adults in the USA don't have government ID, we don't want to disenfranchise them.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6210749 >legally *cant I meant to say
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:qBPfFoYW Mon 10 Mar 2025 15:01:24 No. 6210755 Report >>6210749 That is why I propose we tie the ID with signing up for the draft (Same paperwork for Male and Female to streamline it), Getting green cards, and so on.
Anonymous
>>6210755 Women don't register for the draft in the United States.
Anonymous
>>6210757 >>6210755 Can we tie it to the SSN system so that getting a social security number automatically registers you to vote when you turn 18?
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:qBPfFoYW Mon 10 Mar 2025 15:06:54 No. 6210763 Report Quoted By:
>>6210757 That’s why I mentioned the same paperwork.
Everyone when they turn 18 have to fill it out, you simply check some boxes. Part of the draft or not your’ll be sent a Federal ID. Until the system is worked out alternative IDs would be valid (drivers licenses, Pass ports, so on).
I would say that even when the systme is working we keep those other IDs as valid forms.
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:qBPfFoYW Mon 10 Mar 2025 15:08:36 No. 6210764 Report Quoted By:
>>6210760 That’s also a very good idea. Honestly sounds like a better one.
Anonymous
>>6210391 So QM are we going to get a POV of the public or congress reacting to the gigantic list of bills the use to be quiet forester wants to push after having a lifetime of uneventful service?
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:qBPfFoYW Mon 10 Mar 2025 16:55:01 No. 6210819 Report Quoted By:
>>6210813 I would imagine that if the perp was expecting us to be uneventful would have a ‘’Oh Shit’’ moment
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
Quoted By:
>Abolish unilateral presidential pardons: 7 votes. >Repeal the Patriot Act: 6 votes. These two are taken off the list. The rest will be brought forward to Congress. Locking the remaining 17 in.
>>6210813 That might be interesting. I’ll see how that goes once I put pen on paper (or fingers on keyboard).
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6210813 Congress will be shocked, as the bulk of the measures are actually aimed at them.
What will help though is that Congress always has record low approval ratings and most are non-partisan anti-corruption measures - so we should have very strong public support
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
Quoted By:
~ JANUARY 28 2012 ~ “You’re watching FOX News.” After the hectic day that was yesterday, you’re actually glad to be stuck in the Oval Office, filing monotonous paperwork and taking consecutive calls. You've decided to boot up the TV, figuring someone is probably debating your actions in the Capitol yesterday. And indeed, there is. A single, blonde woman sits in front of a desk, reading off of a teleprompter. The headline “FOSTER FOSTERS RADICALISM” scrolls along the bottom. You almost get a chuckle out of that. “Just yesterday, President Aspen Foster approached our decimated Congress to nominate his picks for cabinet and the Supreme Court. But it looks like he had some of his own…personal motives, as well.” You recline into your chair, hands locked together and feet resting on your desk. You’re interested in seeing how they’ll spin this. “Foster brought four bills and other reforms to Congress, hoping to take advantage of his supermajority and temporary spike in approval to continue Barrett Larson’s radical agenda.” The screen behind her transitioned to show each of your bills in order. Cheap and Competitive Insulin Act. Educate Our Children Again Act. Market Renewal and Investment Act. These ones were quite minor, only containing 2 or so reforms each. That isn’t what seems to be catching the attention of the media and the American people as a whole, however. That goes to the fourth act you passed through Congress and your appointed Supreme Court. The “Free and Fair Democracy Act” which contained a whopping 12 pieces of legislation inside. “President Foster has successfully strong-armed Congress into diminishing their own authority by going after lobbying and donations by legal, voting Americans. Speaking of voting, every American citizen will be forced by the government to vote in every federal election, such as the one coming up next November.” You could tell this is their attempt to remind Americans who usually would abstain from voting of who made it compulsory. You. “Not only that, but the way Americans vote for their representatives and commander in chief has been altered as well. Instead of simply jotting down who they wish to vote for, Americans will now be forced to rank every candidate on the ballot. You know, that seems a little too complicated for me, but I’m not an Ivy League politician.” Neither are you, but it’s the rhetoric that counts. You grab the remote and change the channel. This one is more pleasant for you. CNN is reporting on your insulin bill, talking about their predicted results of the lowered price cap and the decrease in patent lifespans. Conveniently, it’s almost all positive. You flip to another channel, it’s MSNBC discussing the potential aftermath of ending Zero Tolerance and No Child Left Behind with a picture of a sad George W. Bush plastered on the screen. (1/3)
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
Flip, flip, flip. Every news channel is focused entirely on the bills you passed through Congress. Many positive. Many negative. Very, very few are attempting to give a neutral, objective look at your radical, one-day change to the country that, under normal circumstances, would take months or even years to accomplish. The rally ‘round the flag effect is a hell of a drug. You sigh and stand up from your chair. You need to go for a walk, so you do. You begin walking down the halls of the White House until you reach the main entrance. “Where are you going, sir?” “Just going out for a walk.” “Yes, sir.” Naturally, your secret service is surrounding you as you mindlessly walk a lap around Pennsylvania Avenue, lost in thought. The investigation into the bombing of the Capitol is still taking place. The market is still all over the place. International tensions are high. You’re the most powerful man in the free world, but even then there are things you could not hope to fix. What you can only do is fix the things that can be fixed. (2/3)
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
With this free time on your hands, you have time to decide on something very important. The way things are going, you’ll be out of office by January, only being President for a little less than a year…but that’s only on the current track. It’s a bit late in the game, but it’s still entirely possible for you to run for re-election. You didn’t want this position. You didn’t ask to be here. But you’re here now, and you’re the only one who can choose if he wants to continue his administration for another four years or simply be relegated as a transitional president. >I will announce my campaign for re-election. It’ll be tough, but there’s still a lot of work to be done before I hand the torch over to the next person (Democrat, Independent, or something else? Republican is not an option.) >I will not seek re-election. I’m perfectly satisfied with running this country for only a year. I don’t need another term. >Write-in. (3/3)
Anonymous
>>6210895 >>I will announce my campaign for re-election. It’ll be tough, but there’s still a lot of work to be done before I hand the torch over to the next person (Democrat, Independent, or something else? Republican is not an option.) Independant. We must continue our career mostly to make sure the next president doesn't fuck up our bills. If we made any mistakes the blame should fall on our shoulders but if america recovers we can say we really did aim to help the people with our bills. Plus I want to fuck over the two party system with a 3 way race. Also we can definitely win reelection when we start streamlining the DMW process or use corporation penalties to pay for new roads.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6210895 >I will not seek re-election. I’m perfectly satisfied with running this country for only a year. I don’t need another term. End it on a high note.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6210895 >I will announce my campaign for re-election. It’ll be tough, but there’s still a lot of work to be done before I hand the torch over to the next person (Democrat, Independent, or something else? Republican is not an option.) Democrat - we don’t have the time, knowledge or money to build nationwide campaign architecture.
This way, we can influence the next wave of elected Democrats to be in our ‘moderate’ image as well
Anonymous
>>6210899 Also "FOSTER FOSTERS RADICALISM"
Fuck yeah we did, the power corrupted us so hard in three days we swing and beat Congress and some social issues. It can be our slogan Fostering Radicalism for demanding basic security and transparency.
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:qBPfFoYW Mon 10 Mar 2025 20:29:55 No. 6210903 Report >>6210895 >I will announce my campaign for re-election. It’ll be tough, but there’s still a lot of work to be done before I hand the torch over to the next person (Democrat, Independent, or something else? Republican is not an option.) Democrat. Have he’s campaign outright dare people to look for corruption in hem. Have it emphasize how he go after the corruption anywhere.
Tho have he’s campaign take back seat to catching the terrorists responsible for the attack ‘’The tried to scare us by killing our people, they tried to scare us by killing those we the people elected, My Fellow Americans, We the People don’t scare easily and not for long, Vote for me and I will ensure that this tragedy will do nothing other than to make us Stronger.’’
I think our slogan should be something like ‘’Made Us Stronger’’ with us getting a blue hat made for it.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6210895 >I will announce my campaign for re-election. It’ll be tough, but there’s still a lot of work to be done before I hand the torch over to the next person (Democrat, Independent, or something else? Republican is not an option.) Democrat
Make a bad pun about tree-son in a speech somewhere when asked to comment on the insiders in the capitol bombing.
Anonymous
Are we really going to perpetuate the two party system instead of trying to break it? You know that to be 'chosen' by the democrats we'll need a bunch of party favors and other corrupt garbage, right?
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:qBPfFoYW Mon 10 Mar 2025 20:36:27 No. 6210906 Report >>6210903 Also- this is 2015.
Maybe we should find some aids to help us find some streamers, YouTubers, and so on without baggage that supports what we are doing send merch to.
Set up a GoFundMe?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6210903 Let's not 2025/pol/ in the quest.
I like
>>6210902 's slogan better, anyway.
>>6210905 Ranked choice gives us a better chance of winning as independent, sure, but I'm not sure it's enough for the biggest election in the country.
I'd almost suggest not running at all, but I feel like there would be a good chance the next guy just repeals all our reforms if we don't see to it that at least some of the country understands how they've actually helped.
Anonymous
>>6210903 Anytime a politician tries to paint us in a bad light are we have to do is ask how much donations they got from other govts, corpos, or associations. Or ask what they would do to help the people other than empty promises and shallow dreams.
Anonymous
>>6210905 In all likelihood we might trade some favors between parties but we can pick and choose what to give our word on instead of a blanket party approval. Plus we can always threaten to block a specific bill and help the other party instead out of spite.
Anonymous
>>6210910 Anon, you don't get it. If we don't give favors to the democrat party, we will *not* be chosen as their pick for the election.
So uh, enjoy being forced to accept all sorts of corrupt slimeballs.
Anonymous
>>6210912 I want to be independent and trade favors to either side and having a three party race will further split the votes and give us a better chance of winning.
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:qBPfFoYW Mon 10 Mar 2025 20:45:34 No. 6210914 Report Quoted By:
>>6210908 This.
Maybe some adverts are just showing how much the opposition have gotten in lobbying with us standing next to it with
‘’Foster? Nothing form No One. Keep the Green out of the Whitehouse.’’
Anonymous
>>6210913 Or it could just Bull Moose the election.
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:qBPfFoYW Mon 10 Mar 2025 20:47:17 No. 6210917 Report >>6210915 I don’t think the Big Green Party would work out well if we do.
Maybe the next guy could try but people are still use to the status quo.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6210917 We can't run as a democrat as they will demand favoritism when we based our first year on anti-corruption and helping the people. We could afford the insulin bill as that was a common good and a fuck you to big pharma. So staying independent and principled is more important to try and break the two party system. If we fail we gave it a good shot if we succeed we lay the ground work for multi-party system.
Anonymous
>>6210895 >I will announce my campaign for re-election. It’ll be tough, but there’s still a lot of work to be done before I hand the torch over to the next person (Independent) Almost forgot my vote.
Are you annons really so innocent as to believe the democrats would pick Aspen without him sinking neck-deep into the corruption? Without party favors and favoritism? Without having to follow the demands of donors?
Anonymous
>>6210895 >>I will announce my campaign for re-election. It’ll be tough, but there’s still a lot of work to be done before I hand the torch over to the next person (Independent) Fuck it we ball. We'll have to outplay the dems and the cans at their own game. Make everyone we debate sound like both a hypocrite and an idiot in their own party.
But that can come later. We have work to do, problems to solve.
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:VcMDUGRH Mon 10 Mar 2025 21:00:36 No. 6210922 Report >>6210919 We could always on Inauguration Day have our first action as president to to tell the donors to shove off and Second act to open investigations into the blatant corruption that they were foolish enough to let us know about. All the while being completely transparent about it. Maybe if we trust the FBI guy we chosen enough we could have it be a ‘’sting operation’’
If we do good this year, or even catch the bozo who did the attack.
The Lorax on he’s last term can just go on a warpath for the people.
Anonymous
>>6210922 That sounds like a very good way to have mysteriously suicided with two bullets to the back of the head.
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
Quoted By:
>>6210906 >Also- this is 2015. 2012, actually.
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:FKlVUlBO Mon 10 Mar 2025 21:11:25 No. 6210928 Report Quoted By:
>>6210925 We just make sure the VP is even more radical.
What are they going to do? Blow up the capital building/s
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6210925 We are fostering Foster's Radicalism so we need to go further to show we ain't corrupt. Our first year we gut Congress power and limit corruption, one first term we focus on public good, and our second term we hunt down everyone to ensure the board is cleared for multi-party elections once we are done.
>>6210922 FBI, CIA, and the Postal Service should never be trusted.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6210895 >I will announce my campaign for re-election. It’ll be tough, but there’s still a lot of work to be done before I hand the torch over to the next person. >(Independent) Maybe eventually we can make a third political party out of this? Or should we just keep ourselves as Independent?
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:/u9nv1Tc Mon 10 Mar 2025 22:25:26 No. 6210965 Report I think I have an idea of how we might get a lead on who done the bombing. See what stocks one would expect to get hurts the most by such an attack and see who with possible means shortly before the attack sold off significant shares. Maybe also see who bought shares that it would be reasonable to buy in such a situation? I wouldn’t say that those who fit both would be a group with our guy, but it would be worth trying to get some leads that way- maybe we even capture a accomplish. I’m no stocks expert so I don’t know how practical that would be.
Anonymous
>>6210965 >See what stocks one would expect to get hurts the most by such an attack Bro there's no such thing as a single kind of stock that goes down when the ENTIRE US GOVERNMENT gets nuked. Every single kind of stock would go down.
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:/u9nv1Tc Mon 10 Mar 2025 22:34:11 No. 6210973 Report >>6210966 i fully agree, but I bet you there would be some that would get hurt worse or would’t recover as well, or even those that might shoot up after the initial shock
if I have to guess, anything dealing with guns, ammo, survival gear, camping gear, war, Ext might recover the best or shoot up, Banking, Investments/realenstate, and goverments contract, and stuff more reliant on a stable system would recover the worse
Anonymous
>>6210973 I sincerely doubt someone would crash the entire government of the U.S. just to play the stock market. If they wanted money there are easier ways to do that. Gotta be a power play.
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:/u9nv1Tc Mon 10 Mar 2025 22:47:12 No. 6210978 Report Quoted By:
>>6210976 It’s a gamble that they are greedy/have a greedy lackey. Constantinople fell because of a single unlocked door, maybe this guy have someone who didn’t lock he’s door.
Honestly I fully believe that this is a power play. I wouldn’t suggest to put our full resources to this.
If we get a bite- fantastic, if we don’t? Nothing is lost.
Anonymous
>>6203031 Shot in the dark but what if we tried to get the nomination of several minor parties? It’s perfectly legal to do that, just rare, so theoretically if we play our cards right we could get endorsements from the Greens, Reform, etc. It might chip away at the “Pure Independent” label a bit but we’d have an easier time getting on ballots and at least some of these parties would have minor infrastructure and donors in place. Some kind of coalition backing us.
We don’t even have to spin it as antagonistic towards the Dems per se, given the circumstances. We can just do the “We can’t rely on Labels in this period of dramatic change.”, etc.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6210895 >>I will announce my campaign for re-election. It’ll be tough, but there’s still a lot of work to be done before I hand the torch over to the next person (Independent) Anonymous
>>6210920 Reps yelling democrats want to open the border to let the illegals in.
Dems yelling republicans are taking kickbacks from corpos.
Forester yells that dems are using the illegal votes to boost their polls without actually helping them and reps got gifts and hard assets to lobby for them.
Anonymous
>>6211053 I was thinking more
>Dem: "The wealthy should pay their fair share!" >Foster: "You are best friends with billionaires and fudge your tax bracket with non-profits they own." >Rep: "I work for blue-collar Americans!" >Foster: "You also worked as a union buster and employ people off the books at your properties." Pick apart the opps. One of them says they love America? They wear an American flag tie? Pull up with a bald-eagle lapel pin, and a suit that is red-white-blue coded. You already know.
This is silly. None of it works or is a good idea kek. Nothing ever works because of the media propaganda machine. DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:fn/tb85+ Tue 11 Mar 2025 01:52:46 No. 6211089 Report >>6211073 Hense Operation Turn Coat, we convince the Dems that part of this is a PR campaign, that we won’t push to hard when our deals and promises fall through- and then WAM, we tell Doners to shove it on live TV and begin the investigations.
This is the opportunity we were born for.
Anonymous
>>6210895 >>I will announce my campaign for re-election. It’ll be tough, but there’s still a lot of work to be done before I hand the torch over to the next person (Democrat) We go independent we're going to end up like Teddy Roosevelt.
Anonymous
>>6211089 It'd be better to get really plugged into the independent new sphere on the internet right now. Do phone interviews with various political youtubers and streamers. Maybe a set if they want to fly out. Pretty sure even the partisan dupes on the internet at that point in time were still pretty moderate and fence-sitty so that you wouldn't need to play to either angle to get some inroads with any of them. An independent candidate needs an independent source of news dissemination after all. And what better propaganda machine could there be than the entirety of the internet? Embrace the memes. Do a PSA sitting on a tree branch. Keep acorns and bird seed in our pockets. Is this sounding like schizo territory? That's what the people trying to convince you that birds aren't real would say, but they've never left the concrete jungle in their lives, it's not a coincidence, they're Big-Logging thugs.
Honestly there really isn't much we can do from any angle that won't get us put in the firing line. But if we leave a good initial impression then we can probably coast by thanks to being incumbent. People tend to vote for what's already in. >>6211096 A badass? Hell yeah.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6211096 The man that survive an assassination attempt and ignored it to continue his speech. Fuck yeah except we blocked the bullet with an acorn instead of the bible.
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:jkr+AEFd Tue 11 Mar 2025 02:40:43 No. 6211114 Report Quoted By:
Anonymous
>>6211073 >spoiler Then why not break the propaganda machine? Introduce a bill to make the news less partisan. They're already calling us a 'radical', lol
>>6211096 >We go independent we're going to end up like Teddy Roosevelt. I'd be happy if our legacy was like Teddy Roosevelt's.
Anonymous
>>6211136 >Then why not break the propaganda machine? Introduce a bill to make the news less partisan. I mean, other than the constitution? It gets muddy waters. Sure you can point at Fox and say "Red" and you can point at CNN and say "Blue" but a bill that enforces partisan impartiality will eventually be abused by the feds to squash dissenting opinion somehow. It's honestly better to point at a news network and call them paid shills than try to force unbiased reporting. You should always resort to discrediting instead of forcing compliance. Let the market fall as it may.
Anonymous
>>6211138 Burgers eventually got used to hate speech, so if we market it right it'll be normalized too lmao
As for overreach, why not just have news just report things from both sides instead of just one? Give a clear account that's both pro and anti gov, from both left and right. Clear things up instead of allowing echo chambers.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6211147 >As for overreach, why not just have news just report things from both sides instead of just one? They do. Freely. They just choose to be "secretly" bought out propagandists. That's the hangup. The government is not supposed to tell the news what they can and cannot say. So long as it doesn't incite violence or reveal private information at least. The moment you give them rules every outlet is going to lay into you with the full fury they can and probably whip up legal action. Obviously rights are eroded over time so there's no reason why we shouldn't but
I bleed patriotism going after 1A would be horrific optics unlike how 2A is largely debated and picked at. Give it some several decades and it'd probably happen of course.
Anonymous
>>6210894 >Very, very few are attempting to give a neutral, objective look at your radical, one-day change to the country that, under normal circumstances, would take months or even years to accomplish. >>6211147 >why not just have news just report things from both sides instead of just one? We need to reimplement the fairness doctrine at the FCC - shame that we already did the easy Congressional laws.
Here is it a nutshell:
Fairness and Accountability in Broadcasting Act - introduce a requirement that all radio and television license-holders cover public interest issues fairly, and document to the FCC how they are meeting their obligations. Beyond this, companies with radio or TV licenses in more than 4 states must advertise and hold twice yearly public hearings in one of those states, to enable feedback from the general public.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6210905 We set up ranked choice voting so the two-party system is is already pretty weakened.
That and Foster IS a Democrat, it would be ooc for him to switch parties unless they kicked him out.
Anonymous
Anonymous
>>6211190 What entity determines what is "fair?"
Also this might not be constitutional. I think the 1A blocks a lot of stuff.
Anonymous
>>6211236 The FCC had a pretty broad definition and the Supreme Court didn’t consider it unconstitutional in 1969 - even less so when we appoint our own judges
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fairness_doctrine Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6211190 Define "fair", "public interest", "document", and explain how this does not infringe upon Freedom of Speech. What are the penalties for failure to comply and who gets to decide rulings on such cases? And how will feedback be interpreted by the supreme court, a board, or shareholders?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6211247 Well damn so someone did it and it got repealed. That can be our next bill now that we packed the court.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6211247 Interesting. I am concerned about what would happen though if the wrong administration got in office and used it to target political opponents.
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
It looks like you’ll be running for re-election as an independent. Locking in.
Anonymous
>>6211284 Imagine the memes coming in about our stance.
"The Lorax sabotaged the voting system to weaken democracy!"
"Its a psyop running independent to split the votes!"
"Foster wants to deeducate our kids to accept his radicalism!"
"My insulin is affor-wait I can afford insulin. Fuck big pharma!"
"Donation requirements is an invasion of privacy of the American public and Congress!"
"Forester is a govt plant sent by EPA!"
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6211295 /pol/ would be having a seizure about it, I imagine.
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
Quoted By:
As you walk back into the White House and down the halls, you make a pitstop by your chief of staff’s office. “Rory.” You crack the door open and peek inside. “Get me the FEC filing. I’m running for president.” A grin appears on Rory’s face. “On it, sir.” You close the door and walk back into the Oval Office. A few hours pass. You’ve signed the required paperwork, met with some disagreement over your choice to run as an independent. You concede that their hesitation isn’t unfounded. You are entering this campaign for re-election with no pre-existing infrastructure or funding. You’ll have nothing except publicity to propel you forward, and you already know that the Democratic and Republican parties have fought tooth and nail to suppress any third party run since Ross Perot…but this election isn’t like the one 20 years ago. It’s not even like the one 4 years ago. The system’s been fundamentally altered. This is the best chance anyone’s had of winning the presidency as an independent since George Washington. The cameras are in place. The lights, the sound, all set up. The makeup is on your face. Your hastily written script has been fed into the teleprompter. You signal to the cameraman from your Oval Office and he begins counting down. 3…2…1…action. “Good evening, America. My name is Aspen Foster. As most of you know, I have been serving as your president ever since the despicable terrorist attack on our Capitol Building. It’s only been four days since then, but I know for a lot of you it must feel like it’s been four hundred.” It’s definitely felt like four hundred for you, anyways. “There’s a lot of uncertainty. There’s a lot of fear. The people responsible for this are still unknown and out there in the world somewhere. I understand your feelings of worry because I feel them as well. But you can be assured that this administration will not rest until justice is dealt and the decent people of this country can feel safe again.” You slowly let out a sigh, trying not to make it audible or visible. “Yesterday, I worked with Congress to pass a series of legislation and reform that have fundamentally changed the way this government functions, and hopefully we will see that it has been changed for the better. We’ve gotten a lot of work done in these past few days, and there’s much more work to do for the remainder of this year. However, I fear this bipartisan work may be cut short if someone with a self-serving agenda is sworn in come next January. That is why, in order to prevent such a thing from happening and to continue the great work we have been accomplishing, I am announcing my candidacy for another four years as your President of the United States. I will not be running on a Democratic platform, nor a Republican platform. I will be running to ensure that this country can get back on its feet and prosper greater then it ever has before.” (1/2)
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
“I hope that, come November, I will have your support in making this goal a reality. Thank you, and may God bless America.” The feed cuts and you slink back into your chair, one hand reaching up to your collar to loosen the tie around your neck. With that out of the way, you need to get to work on assembling a campaign team. The two major parties have a head start. Hell, even the third parties have some things set up as well. If you’re going to win this, you can’t waste a single second. You spend the rest of the day making and taking calls, finding skilled people willing to help you win another four years in the White House. But a campaign is only as good as its plan. What is your plan?>I’m going to appeal to the populist vote. I may not be an outsider, but someone who managed to pass electoral reform like I did can easily win a lot of them over. >I’m going to try and appeal to the moderate sect. These people want a return to normalcy and I will campaign on giving that back to them on a silver platter. >I’m going to target the Democrats. I’m still a card-carrying member and a lifelong liberal. They’re the most likely to vote for me, though it may take some convincing to vote for an independent. >I’m going to target the Republicans. I know it seems crazy, but I need this campaign to be a national coalition. A united front for safety and security against the opportunistic ideologues and career politicians vying for my seat. >I need to go after the third party votes. After my electoral reform yesterday it’ll be a lot easier for them to win elections, but it won’t be an instant change. People are still familiar with a two party system, so we need to be united if we want to beat that in this election. >Write-in. (2/2)
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6211311 >>I need to go after the third party votes. After my electoral reform yesterday it’ll be a lot easier for them to win elections, but it won’t be an instant change. People are still familiar with a two party system, so we need to be united if we want to beat that in this election. >write in: go after the people who are tired of just the 2 parties and want to vote for something different than 'the lesser evil of two candidates' Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6211311 I would say
Avoid the demo and rep parties as we want to stand on different issues than the same ones that get parroted every year.
Moderates is a bit iffy as Foster is never going back to the status quo and more bills will come to change merica.
Third party votes to build our unique platform and force the other two parties to scramble to take sides and inform their votes. Populist vote kinda needs us to take a stance so we know what to run on. So I say we go for the third party vote then populists.
>I need to go after the third party votes. After my electoral reform yesterday it’ll be a lot easier for them to win elections, but it won’t be an instant change. People are still familiar with a two party system, so we need to be united if we want to beat that in this election. Anonymous
>>6211311 Why are we choosing only one again? If we're going independent, we need votes from EVERYONE. From the populists, the moderates, crats and the cans, the third parties...we need to sway everyone who isn't a Die-Hard Party Loyalist.
I guess this would be more leaning to populists, but we need to campaign on an universal campaign.
Anonymous
>>6211311 >I’m going to appeal to the populist vote. I may not be an outsider, but someone who managed to pass electoral reform like I did can easily win a lot of them over. The largest political party in the US is "non-voter." Our reforms just open the floodgates of a massive untapped voter base. We need to tap into this market.
And honestly, I think a good chunk of Democrats are already going rank us 1 or 2.
Though to go out of character for a second, our electoral reforms would likely be challenged in court atm. We didn't stack the bench so I am interested in seeing how the court rules on there legality.
Anonymous
Browsing the constitution, I think Congress can only legally regulate Congressional elections. Article 2 says picking Electors (who pick the POTUS) is under state jurisdiction>Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector. I am interested into how our Court rules on this. As we know the Supreme Court has a history of just making up bullshit to justify what they want, so they can rule either way, but since we did not stack the court in our favor I suspect they would strike down the Presidential clause unless we do something radcial
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6211321 Maybe we could try to pressure state legislatures to sign onto to it for the potus election...
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:89n5BgTz Tue 11 Mar 2025 20:27:12 No. 6211325 Report Quoted By:
>>6211320 Support- I say we might want to frame it to traditional Rebs and Dems as a better option than the lesser evil.
Maybe one advert can spoof commercials?
‘’Tired of the same old party’’
‘’Tired of only having the choice of one of 2 candidates?’’
‘’Tired of having to chose the candidate who you believe would screw you over less?’’
‘’Vote Foster, Foster Fosters Radicalism’’
‘’This message is approved by the Radical Foster Campaign’’
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6211311 >I’m going to appeal to the populist vote. I may not be an outsider, but someone who managed to pass electoral reform like I did can easily win a lot of them over. >I need to go after the third party votes. After my electoral reform yesterday it’ll be a lot easier for them to win elections, but it won’t be an instant change. People are still familiar with a two party system, so we need to be united if we want to beat that in this election. Both of these - target non-voters and those fed up with the two party system
>>6211321 >Supreme Court We’ll need to meet with the Chief Justice to ensure their support
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6211316 Remember that a play for everyone is a play for no one.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6211190 >>6211247 >https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fairness_doctrine Huh, this is actually better than what I had in mind lol
>>6211311 >I’m going to appeal to the populist vote. I may not be an outsider, but someone who managed to pass electoral reform like I did can easily win a lot of them over. >I need to go after the third party votes. After my electoral reform yesterday it’ll be a lot easier for them to win elections, but it won’t be an instant change. People are still familiar with a two party system, so we need to be united if we want to beat that in this election. The two of these combined is fine by me.
But if there's a tie, I'll have this to be only the populist vote.
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
Locking in both the populist and third party votes.
Anonymous
>>6211617 Okay guys time to run a platform. Wikipedia the best unbiased source of information says 2010s faced climate change, voting rights, gun control, police misconduct, and immigration.
So uh we can definitely say we empowered third party and undecided voters. Immigration is a solved issue after the disappearance of Mexico. Crack down on police conduct by having any police brutality cases be paid by their pensions so they self police themselves or leave the force. Gun control should give people more guns as an armed society is a polite one. Climate change open more parks, bitches love parks.
Anonymous
>>6211632 >Gun control should give people more guns as an armed society is a polite one. Gun safety courses are now mandatory. Everyone gets a free HiPoint as a starter.
Anonymous
>>6211636 The idea of safety courses is good on paper until you realize it can easily be used to fail anyone you don't like. Hell, you could just choke out the number of people who are even allowed by making the number of "instructors" really small.
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:Z7Q5pH/r Wed 12 Mar 2025 19:08:53 No. 6211639 Report >>6211637 Maybe allow schools to have gun clubs again and pay Disney or something to do a short series that covers gun safety that can be shown in schools?
Anonymous
>>6211637 You just sponsor gun clubs like Finland did. Don't need to get too involved with it. Not like we need to make the ATF run around doing an actual job.
Anonymous
>>6211639 Sadly, I don't think the modern american child is smart enough to be trusted with such things like the old ones were. They're just a lot less develop both mentally and biologically.
>>6211642 Sponsoring gun clubs is a lot more consistent, yes.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6211643 Donate old guns like the garand to hook the new generation of kids to the glory of the ping and .45 ACP so they understand the soul damage of firing it. We got plenty of guns we aren't using so we can continue to have more guns per each person in America.
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
You decide that you will focus your appeal on the populists, trying to pick up some third party voters along the way. After all, you assume they’d be the most likely to vote for you. The populists because of your radical electoral reform and the third parties because they want nothing more than to break the two party system, which you currently hold the best chance of accomplishing. Once you are halfway finished assembling a proper campaign team, you get the message out about who you wish to target. Now the rest is in their skillful hands. You probably have time this week to cram in a single personal event this week, even if there’s still the chaos to address.>I will host a fundraiser in New York City. Right now, this campaign needs money, money, money. I’m fighting an uphill battle in that regard, and every cent counts. >I’ll hold a rally in Denver. I need to get people fired up if they’re going to turn out and vote for me, so putting on a show would be beneficial. >Maybe a town hall event right here in DC is what I need. Something casual and lowkey. Answer people’s questions about the campaign. Help people understand what my platform is. >Write-in. ~ FEBRUARY 4 2012 ~ After a week of juggling between running the country and getting your campaign off of the ground, you thought it would’ve been monotonous for a while until some new revelation is made. When you’re called into the situation room with a vital update on the Capitol investigation, you are proven correct. You just didn’t expect it so soon. As you walk into the situation room, you are met with the familiar sight of two dozen military and national security advisors. “Alright, what’s going on?” An old, stocky man decorated with medals stands up. “We’ve found a lead, sir. After going through the phone records of every State of the Union Address attendee and every call made on pre-paid cellphones, payphones and phone booths in DC a week in advance and we found something quite interesting.” A photograph of a man appears on the large screen in the front. An old man wearing a suit, looking just a little disheveled. “Cecil Beynon, representing New York’s 13th congressional district. He resigned his office just hours before the attack and he was last seen a day after, getting onto a ferry in Buffalo crossing into Canada. We catalogued a series of calls he made with a certain individual.” “al-Hai…” “That’s right, sir. We’ve concluded that Rajab al-Hai was blackmailing Mr. Beynon into organizing the attack. We don’t believe he was working alone in setting up the bombs, but we do believe he was the contact between the perpetrators in Washington and al-Hai.” “I see…so the MFSA wasn’t lying when they took responsibility?” “It seems that way, sir.” Another man in a suit stands up. “How should we approach this, Mr. President?” (1/2)
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
>Find Cecil. Get in contact with the Canadian government and start a manhunt until he’s found and brought back here. If he’s the piece that connects this puzzle, we need to wring as much information as we can out of him. >Get the Iraqi President on the phone. We need to have their full cooperation in capturing Rajab al-Hai and bringing him to justice. If they are uncooperative, then I will ask Congress to declare military action until we crush these terrorists. >Write-in. (2/2)
Anonymous
>>6211658 >Maybe a town hall event right here in DC is what I need. Something casual and lowkey. Answer people’s questions about the campaign. Help people understand what my platform is. Demos and reps will have more money and zealot speeches than us but we can further distinguish ourselves as the grounded tree guy than another politician. Main risk is saying out of context things or getting blind sided by questions but having a platform we are running on will let our ideas spread as the two parties try to slander us. Plus focusing on money or putting on a show might be seen as disingenuous.
>>6211659 Write-in: Do not let anything leak out from this room to Canada, Iraq, or anyone else. Set up a special team to find Cecil quietly in case there are more moles still inside the government.
Honestly at this point the moles are either gone or still in DC so we must keep the news of this as quiet as possible or risk Al-Hai to start wacking moles. I really don't want to another war on terror and would much prefer sending in limited manpower to Iraq.
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:jVeY6m5J Wed 12 Mar 2025 20:18:33 No. 6211665 Report >>6211661 Support
Do you think it might be a good idea to allow false information to leak out?
Maybe we let it leak that there’s reason to believe that Al is just taking credit or covering for someone who is actually responsible? Maybe an unnamed contractor that was working on the Capital who may had fled to Mexico or something?
Maybe set up a ‘sloppy’ special team to start looking in the Bahamas or something?
Anonymous
>>6211658 >I will host a fundraiser in New York City. Right now, this campaign needs money, money, money. I’m fighting an uphill battle in that regard, and every cent counts. Without money, we can’t do anything - we need to create a superPAC as well
>Direct the full resources of US intelligence agencies to finding Cecil. Once found, send a spec ops team into Canada to extract him We don’t want to spill the beans to Canada and risk tipping him off. We’re probably better placed to find him anyway
@QM, has any public polling been done on our reforms / performance to date as President?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6211665 No false leaks as if Al was smart enough to go this capital strike, he will be smart enough to realize we are sending out false leaks and will try to wipe more evidence. At least by keeping silent we can send in a team to grab Cecil before he gets wacked.
>>6211666 I wouldn't trust all the departments as just one person will leak that they are looking for Cecil and risks Al going in and killing him. We need Cecil alive so we can find out how much deeper the conspiracy goes.
Anonymous
>>6211661 >>6211666 It might be bad optics to send Seal Team 6 to Canada (ally country) without warning them. The information should probably remain as behind closed doors as possible, though.
Anonymous
>>6211665 The one thing we could do after winning the presidency is declare the investigation going cold and due to lacking any evidence of potential suspects we close the case. It would be hurt our career and public trust but ensures the intelligence team more time to find this fucker and give them a sense of safety to be more in public making the assassination much more easy achieve when we root out Cecil.
Anonymous
>>6211669 We could probably let the Canadian president know about our target but still avoiding letting anyone else know to avoid leaks. I am just very paranoid as this strike was way too coordinated and they even prepared an escape route for Cecil.
Anonymous
>>6211666 >@QM, has any public polling been done on our reforms / performance to date as President? LoveOrHate.com , a popular polling website in America, shows these results. You peaked with 91% approval rating on January 26th after your address to the nation and subsequently bottomed out at 50% after you passed a series of radical reform. Now you’re polling steady at 69%. The rally ‘round the flag effect is still active, it seems.
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
Quoted By:
>>6211674 Dropped my trip. I also intended to post this photo of Cecil Beynon but must’ve forgotten to do so.
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:/MgsSCnD Wed 12 Mar 2025 21:51:16 No. 6211700 Report >>6211673 I say we call in *not Trudo* for a economic meeting and, in private, inform hem and ask hem to keep quiet, and then have a uneventful meeting that ends in ‘’status quo’’.
By just telling hem- I mean a private room with just Us and hem.
>>6211672 I wouldn’t say cold leads and case close, but have us do actions that make it seem like we are beginning to grasp at straws.
Anonymous
>>6211700 Your right anon's correct we should let notTrudo know we have a lead on the terrorism case but due to internal investigation we have to silence leaks to avoid spooking away our marks.
For the straws what about like announcing an expansion to the investigation into the construction crews that built the buildings and investigation into sewage networks?
>>6211661 Adjusting my vote to let NotTrudo know about our lead in the investigation and our forces operating in his home during an economic meeting.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6211658 >I’ll hold a rally in Denver. I need to get people fired up if they’re going to turn out and vote for me, so putting on a show would be beneficial. >>6211659 >Write-in: Do not let anything leak out from this room to Canada, Iraq, or anyone else. Set up a special team to find Cecil quietly in case there are more moles still inside the government. DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:xlD0VFkC Wed 12 Mar 2025 23:45:09 No. 6211740 Report Quoted By:
>>6211715 I’m adjusting my vote to follow you.
We’re smarter than the average bear.
Anonymous
>>6211637 >>6211636 >>6211632 Do guns like cars.
You need a license to use one. You need to take a test and a course and your license gets revoked if you're a shitheel with it.
Anonymous
>>6211780 Tell me anon, would you trust your political opponents - the party you DONT like - to wield such power while they were in charge?
Do you believe they would not be able to abuse it in any way?
Anonymous
>>6211780 Licenses for guns are gay as hell, man. Ask the Aussies and assorted Euros how that is. It'd also make a list of gun owners, which is a privacy violation. It's basically the first step to actually effectively disarming a population. So all of that is a hard no from me. Also, SHALL NOT lmao.
Anonymous
>>6211792 Right? It's like, I really do get the idea of not wanting any retard to be able to go in a store and walk out with an RPG, but literally every time you have those "licenses" and "courses" it just turns into "only the rich and their security dogs are allowed to have guns"
Anonymous
>>6211786 I don't trust the government, period, but the automobile regulation system is a proven model for managing deadly machines that millions of people use.
Anonymous
>>6211796 *Proven as in every state in the union uses driver's licenses and the sky hasn't fallen.
Anonymous
>>6211796 The difference is that the government isn't afraid of automobiles, not when they can get shutdown remotely, listen in to all you say and be tracked at any moment.
Once you estabilish that licenses and courses are necessary, they'll keep adding up more and more, making the courses more expensive and lengthy and annoying and literally everything. In the end, the only civilians who own firearms will be private security firms that protect rich faggots.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6211794 That's why I like gun stores as private entities. If you seem askance, be it in attitude or capacity, they can just not sell you anything. Combine that with the fact that you already go through a background check means that lawful sales to unlawful people are rare as hell. And said stores many times do provide you with a course or rundown to familiarize yourself with whatever you get. Of course we can't forget that in a state where you need a license to conceal carry means you also need to go through an actual program to test your aptitude before you can legally drag the thing around? There are in fact a lot of steps already in place to check people out. People love to act like it's the wild west where you go two towns over and no one has ever even heard of you so you can pick up a gun from any shop.
>>6211796 I mean, there are more fatalities involving cars in the US than guns. And I'm pretty sure the ratio of gun to citizen is still higher than the ratio of car to citizen that is kind of telling. If you kill someone with a gun by mistake, even if it is ruled as non-criminal you're more than likely getting the gun confiscated and given an order to not get another one until you prove competence. Meanwhile, you kill someone with a car by mistake and it's deemed non-criminal they just revoke your license temporarily and make you pay to get a new one or they make you take a test to prove you can drive and send you on your way.
To say nothing of the political ramifications of being able to identify "dissidents"
read: anyone we don't like and have someone "anonymously tip" they're a "bad actor" and get them arrested or put on watch to harass or impede them. Which will absolutely happen. And even if it doesn't by some miracle, they'll just make it so there's ten thousand courses and requirements to get a license, which costs a shitton of money and time. And they'll probably just deny it out of hand just so you have to do it all again to make quota for their department.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6211800 >>6211798 Frankly, the most reasonable solution would be a mass and organized divestment of the government period, but that's probably too radical for Foster.
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:VWea9p0F Thu 13 Mar 2025 03:39:55 No. 6211843 Report I think at minimum there should be a license for explosive weapons (RPG, granade lunchers, mortars) and at maximum for small scale automatics (Uzis). Licanceing for everything else have to either be a mean to prevent unreformed felons from getting them for children to buy them without parental permission. The 2A is to protect the 1A from threats foreign and domestic.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6211843 >Licanceing for everything else have to either be a mean to prevent unreformed felons from getting them for children to buy them without parental permission. Both of those things are already true though. Convicted felons cannot purchase or own firearms legally. Nor can guns be sold to children.
Anonymous
Felons don't really care about the law, in any case.
Anonymous
Anonymous
>>6211843 Licensing won't stop felons from acquiring weapons from the black market. The aim for the licenses should be to arm law abiding citizens for self defense. Just update the courses to include automatics, shotguns, and machine guns.
Anonymous
>>6211859 I don't even know why anyone would want to implement licenses. The only reason why driver's licenses are a thing is because roads are state and federal property by law, so you are being leased their usage, hence license. So in this case it would be more apt to call it a permit, though the term is thrown around synonymously with license as a result of lingual drift
I am guilty of this kek . But a permit would be unconstitutional, since it is already "permitted" by virtue of being a law abiding citizen. That right is only void by being a criminal, basically proving that you cannot be relied upon to act in a lawful manner.
Of course I'm just not down for this sort of thing because I don't trust the government not to fuck it up somehow through sheer spite and incompetence. So maybe it's just my bias bleeding through.
Anonymous
>>6211867 I'm inclined to agree with you: the government will fuck it up if it has the chance (and it will have the chance).
And trying to pass something like this while we're trying to go for re-election is basically shooting ourselves in the foot, anyway.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6211870 >And trying to pass something like this while we're trying to go for re-election is basically shooting ourselves in the foot, anyway. This is why Foster never leaves home without his kevlar Timbs! Jokes aside, absolutely. Right now he should be focusing on not rocking the boat and ingratiating himself. He wants to look less like a crazed ideologue who lucked into being president to shake up the system and more like a reasonable person with high hopes even if his policies seem flawed outwardly.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6211658 >>Maybe a town hall event right here in DC is what I need. Something casual and lowkey. Answer people’s questions about the campaign. Help people understand what my platform is. >Write-in: Do not let anything leak out from this room to Canada, Iraq, or anyone else. Set up a special team to find Cecil quietly in case there are more moles still inside the government. AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
Quoted By:
Town Hall event in DC, set up a special team to find Cecil quietly, only tell the Canadian Prime Minister. Locking in.
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
I don’t think I’d be able to put out a reply in a timely manner today, so hopefully tomorrow the update will be posted.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6212081 No worries - take as much time as you need.
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
Quoted By:
“I want a special team assembled immediately. This needs to be as top secret as it can get. We don’t know if there’s any other insiders who might have ties to al-Hai, so only those required are to be informed of anything regarding the finding and retrieval of Cecil Beynon.” “Yes, sir. “Also, get Clark Morrow on the phone. We can’t just send armed men into his backyard without telling him.” “On it.” After a few minutes of setting up a secure line, you are greeted with the face of a man sitting at a desk. “Greetings, Mr. President.” “Same goes to go, Mr. Prime Minister.” “I assume this is something important.” “It is. Can I be promised that nothing we say here leaves this call?” “You can.” “We have reason to believe that a conspirator behind the bombing of our Capitol has fled into Canada. We’re assembling a special team to find and capture him while we still can. I promise you, Prime Minister, I will ensure that this team intrudes as little as possible.” The man reclines in his chair, twirling a pen in one hand as he receives this information. “…I understand. Does the US need any assistance?” “Not at the moment. Your cooperation is all we need.” “Duly noted.” The call ends, unceremonious and without any proper signing off. You and the rest of the men and women in the situation room waste no time in making your exit and getting to work. For them, they have a lot of work to do now. For you, the only thing to do is wait. Wait for updates. Wait for progress. Wait for anything. ~ FEBRUARY 5 2012 ~ The Democratic and Republican have been in full swing since early January. Even though your popularity has been steadily in high 60s, much better than some other presidents in your time have managed to maintain for more than a few days, you still are polling in a close third behind the front runners for both major party’s nominee. The only advantage you have over them is that you’re already campaigning beyond the primary season and are focused on November while your main opponents are still fighting their fellow party members. While they’re stuck campaigning in whatever states are having an upcoming primary, you can campaign wherever you’d like. You wouldn’t be able to stay long, but taking time out of your schedule to meet your fellow Americans in person can go a long way. (1/2)
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
>I’ll make a few stops along the west coast. Mostly California due to their high population, but I’ll make one or two stops at Oregon and Washington as well. >I’ll drive through the Midwest. The rust belt has been solidly blue since Bill Clinton, but with the chaos of this election I might be able to take advantage of their feeling of abandonment. >The southwest, of course. That’s my home and where I’d feel the most comfortable. I’ve already established roots there, so I’d probably have an easier time pulling votes from these states. >Write-in. This can also include anything else you want to do in the next week or so either in addition to or instead of the main options. (2/2)
Anonymous
>>6212609 >The southwest, of course. That’s my home and where I’d feel the most comfortable. I’ve already established roots there, so I’d probably have an easier time pulling votes from these states. Start where we’re already strong - it will give us momentum and the media will report on that.
Midwest will be next - we can talk about the infrastructure and insulin bills we pushed through congress
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:qBPfFoYW Sat 15 Mar 2025 01:01:19 No. 6212742 Report >>6212657 Support.
Maybe we could look into online adverts or YouTube vids
4Chan is 5 cents per 1000 adds.
Anonymous
>>6212657 +1
>>6212742 I wouldn't worry about 4chan. By mow there's probably already an /pag/ on /pol/
Anonymous
>>6212742 >>6212752 I'm also not quite certain Aspen is the type of person to know what 4Chan is besides possibly dated 'the hacker known as 4chan' news memes.
Anonymous
>>6212657 +1
>>6212742 4chan is too young for an old guy like Aspen to know about and way too niche. Plus, pol is already making memes about our candidacy and conspiracy theories that will leak to the rest of 4chan.
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:LfToXorq Sat 15 Mar 2025 01:44:44 No. 6212772 Report Quoted By:
>>6212760 Honestly good point.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6212752 >>6212760 >>6212769 >tfw some guy explains 4chan to foster - poorly- and he winds up thinking it's a wonderful place of free speech and hobbyists and decides to throw a couple dozen grand at it to "keep up the good work" Anonymous
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
Quoted By:
Southwest + online ads. Locking in.
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
~ FEBRUARY 13 2012 ~ Your first tour on the campaign trail went as well as you hoped for. Eight cities across eight days across eight states, you managed to put together a good series of rallies where you went. Whether it was the deep red states of Oklahoma and Utah or the blue wall of California and Colorado, there were more than enough people rooting for you in the southwest to have a very successful tour. As you board Air Force One and depart back to Washington, you take a look at the stops you made. Denver, Albuquerque, Phoenix, Salt Lake City, Las Vegas, Los Angeles, Oklahoma City and Houston in the order. According to one of your campaign staff, you drummed up an average of 20,000 people per rally. Not bad during the primary season, you think to yourself. Not bad at all. Your best rally was, no surprise, in Denver in no due part thanks to your history there. Not only that, but your Denver rally managed to attraction some nationwide attention since it took place during the Republican primary in Colorado as well. The media noted that you were campaigning only a few blocks away from one of the GOP frontrunners. Other than that, your tour was quite normal. While you were out in the southwest, the young members of your campaign staff whipped together a website and a few social media pages for you. Facebook, YouTube, BlogSpot and Twitter now has your presence on it with semi-regular updates. One of your aides suggested some place called four chan, but that didn't go anywhere. With the money you managed to collect from tickets and merchandise sales (oh yeah, you started producing those now), you had enough money to air your first ad online. It was met with only a moderate uptick in traffic to your website. With this tour concluded and your online space developed, your campaign has truly kicked off now. The phone rings. You pick it up. “Sir, we have a location on Beyno-“ “Hold on.” You get out of your chair and close the door to the plane’s office before sitting back down. “Continue.” “We have a probable location on Cecil Beynon. He seems to be staying in a motel in Midland, Ontario. We didn’t see him with anybody else.” Damn, that was quick. You figured this would be a month-long affair, not a week. “Do my men have permission to enter, Mr. President?” “Yes.”>Roll 1d20. DC: 18. Best of three.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Rolled 12 (1d20) >>6213067 >stopping in vegas instead of carson city >touching LA at all >somehow not taking a wrong turn at albuquerque What in the hell is going on. Anyway, GET THAT MUHFUGGA
Anonymous
Rolled 18 (1d20) >>6213067 Er, hopefully more successfully, though.
Anonymous
Rolled 20 (1d20) >>6213067 Da fuck was al hai smart enough to leave a surveillance team on Cecil to give that high of a DC?
Anonymous
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:lrFlR3mb Sat 15 Mar 2025 20:00:00 No. 6213103 Report Quoted By:
>>6213077 Some mercenary is going to look away for a second only for the perp to be gone.
Also he’s wallet gone.
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
>>6213077 There are exactly 18 cocaine-fed hyenas inside of Cecil’s motel room.
Anonymous
>>6213115 Damn, I was not paranoid enough to send in more than just a recover team. Next time we are attaching a spec ops team as well and casing the perimeter for more hidden guards.
Anonymous
>>6213117 >we just need to send someone to pick him up, no biggie >he has armed belligerents guarding him? shit >oh we sent the really competent field guy purely by chance to grab the guy? well, no biggie What are the odds, right?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6213115 DC represents the number of cocaine-fed hyenas between us and any given objective; got it.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6213118 All the cocaine dogs are coming down from a high as our agents rush the dealer and tossed some dog treats to distract them to steal Cecil
Anonymous
So is the boomer Normiecrat we brought on as VP comfortable with us running as an independent? If not we might want to pick a running mate who is. He didn’t really strike me as a “shock the entire system” type of soul
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6213276 I assumed we were going to VP someone else for the second term - from the initial description, it seemed like Wells was just taking the position as a victory lap before retirement.
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
Quoted By:
>>6213077 >20 I would say locking in, but this ain’t up for being changed anyways.
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
You place the phone on the desk beside you and wait in silence. A minute passes. You fiddle with your ring, waiting to hear an update. You flick your wrist and check the time on your watch. Another minute passes. It’s been two minutes and counting. You pace around the room before you check your watch again. Another minute passes. It’s been three minutes and coun- “-esident? Mr. Pr-“ You grab the phone and pick it up, holding it to your ear. “Yes, yes. I’m here.” “We got him, sir. Cecil Beynon is in our custody.” You breathe an audible sigh of relief. “No complications?” “None at all, sir. He surrendered the moment my men broke through the front door.” “Good…good. Thank you.” “Of course, sir. We’re escorting him back to Washington for you.” You hang up the phone and fall back into your chair. “Phew…” Your expectations for a quick and easy capture were low. You didn’t even think you’d have found him this quickly, never mind apprehend him. To think that all of it took just a little over a week. You pick up the phone again, dialing your assistant. “Send a message to Prime Minister Morrow. Tell him we’re thankful for his cooperation and are pulling out of Ontario now.” ~ FEBRUARY 15 2012 ~ You’ve been back in DC for two days, and so has Cecil. The feds have been having a field day interrogating him. The FBI. The CIA. The NSA. The DHS. They’ve all been taking turns with the old man, and eventually he cracked. Thanks to him, you now know the names of all 12 perpetrators who, working on the inside, managed to set up bombs inside the Capitol. Two of them died during the attack, and you have one who’s in your custody. That just leaves nine roaming about somewhere. You wasted no time in putting out a list with the names and faces of all nine suspects. Now when someone takes a look at the FBI’s top ten most wanted, they’re met with nine people responsible for the same terrorist attack and whatever serial killer of the month is stuck at #10. Friends and families are interrogated and their homes searched. Bounties are put out. There’s no reason to keep information to yourself, now. If al-Hai didn’t provide any protection for Cecil and also let two of his conspirators die, then he probably didn’t provide any protection for the other nine as well. It’s just them versus the entire resource of the US government. >Roll 1d9. Worst of 3. 1/2
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
You figure it won’t be long until the first suspects in this nationwide manhunt are caught. If it was this easy to find one of them in a foreign country, you’ll have an easy time within your own borders. For now, you just need to leave this to the professionals. In the meantime, while you’re cutting the limbs off of the beast, its head has gone unaddressed. The MFSA. Rajab al-Hai. They’ve been sitting in the Iraqi deserts and hiding in their mountains this whole time and you haven’t addressed them at all yet. People across America have been demanding justice, and you can’t ignore them forever. But is now the time?>Yes. Now’s the time. I’ve waited too long and have let these bastards sleep long enough. It’s time we take the fight to them. (Feel free to add how you wish to specifically do so.) >No. They have what’s coming for them, but I already have too much on my plate already. I can’t add more to it right now. Once things have calmed down here at home, I will bring them justice. >Write in. 2/2
Anonymous
>>6213591 >write-in: Get intelligence, generals, and support staff to draw up potential plans for dealing with MFSA We need a drawing board to figure out what is possible. Another war on terror will take thousands of lives and another ten years wasted on infrastructure.
Sending a bio-plague infiltrator to kill them fast is easier but risks contamination breach and international backlash.
CIA op where we send moles in deep cover to neurotoxin the guy will take years but limit collateral damage for everyone.
A bombing campaign with specially designed warheads to crack harden bunkers might get him assuming he stays in one place.
I personally want to send the CIA covert team to infiltrate and neurotoxin the leader, send in a MERS camel virus to lock them down, then send in the bombers and army to sweep the area. Just full overkill and back up plans if this fucker somehow dodges our kill attempts for 15 years like the other guy did.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Rolled 6 (1d9) >>6213611 rolling for prep catches
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:qBPfFoYW Sun 16 Mar 2025 19:35:31 No. 6213617 Report Quoted By:
>>6213591 >Yes. Now’s the time. I’ve waited too long and have let these bastards sleep long enough. It’s time we take the fight to them. (Feel free to add how you wish to specifically do so.) Make sure all of our funding of these terrorists had stopped by now, be transparent that someone screwed up by providing support/funding in the whenever. Then give a statement;
‘’All Nations currently or within the last 2 years have provided aid, support, intel, money, Ext to this organization is advised to contact the USA on diplomatic channels to admit to such, to cease such activity, and to hand over all intel gathered about this organization so far. We ask this to be done within 24 hours or there will be servere diplomatic consequences’’
Contact the relevant nations to allow for special operations to target these terrorists. any oil wells they control is to be torched, any poppy fields or other drugs plant feilds are to be napalmed with warnings dropped 6 hours earlier, drop flyers in towns and cities and broadcast on radio saying that all factories making weapons, uniforms, and other materials of war are valid military targets and all casualties will be treated as acceptable. Also includes reminders that protected structures are no longer protected if utilized to military ends, and advise them that if they see military equipment within such structures they are advised to leave and to inform those they can of such equipment.
Any arms dealer selling to these bozos are to be targeted, if they try to flee by plane or boat they will be shot down fin within US or International waters or airspace.
If nations refuse to allow for special operations, publicly and preferably at the UN, a question will be asked ‘’are you allied with these terrorists?’’
Anonymous
Rolled 4 (1d9) >>6213589 Roll.
>>6213591 >>Yes. Now’s the time. I’ve waited too long and have let these bastards sleep long enough. It’s time we take the fight to them. (Feel free to add how you wish to specifically do so.) Inform the Iraqi president that Iraq will be getting a new lakebed. It will be filled with shrapnel. And then we let the airforce clear out their stockpile of outdated munitions on all MFSA affiliated locations. Utilize the American doctrine of overwhelming firepower for once. For all MFSA stuff located in population centers we'll use more precision by doing them like Bonnie & Clyde instead to minimize civilian casualties.
They decided to play of game of bombs with the U.S. and that is a big nono.
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:qBPfFoYW Sun 16 Mar 2025 19:46:53 No. 6213630 Report >>6213628 Maybe we should have this continuously ramp up.
today it’s the arms dealer, tomorrow it’s entire Mexican Cartels who do business with the terrorists, the day after one of our fleets is threatening to seize cargo ships who go to the ports of nations who continue to support the terrorists.
Anonymous
>>6213630 For whatever reason this made me think of the stone grinding sound effect as America's attention turns away from the middle east down to central and south America looking for cartels and gangs. And I would be down to actually do away with them. But the Mexican politosphere is pretty much owned by the cartels so actually getting them to sign off on letting the U.S. do things is pretty much a non-starter and we can't really threaten them like we can the middle eastern nations right this moment.
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:qBPfFoYW Sun 16 Mar 2025 20:03:58 No. 6213638 Report >>6213633 We could label the relevant cartels/mobs as terrorist organizations but give warnings to the government in the same meeting before we do so. These cartels are- in a manner- in it for the money, things become less profitable when your crack factory get tomahawked while your mansion is greeted by special forces with Tomahawks.
Also; it won’t literally be a day and there would be steps in between. IE; it comes to light that McMining dose buisness with the terrorists, guess who will become persona non-grata and what companies will be told to purge their supply lines of McMining’s ore.
Anonymous
>>6213638 It doesn't work like that. We have a solid justification for a "proportional" response in the middle east right here because the MFSA is there and pulled off an unprecedented attack on the U.S. but the cartels kind of just exist. There aren't strong ties between the two and they are half the world away. We -could- classify the cartels as terror orgs and that's fine but we simply can't do anything on Mexican soil without help from Mexican officials. We can't strongarm them like we can with Iraq at the moment. And since we can't we'd need to get the Mexican government to sign off on it, which they simply will not do. Half of them are paid for by the cartel and the other half have their families in the crosshairs of the cartel. This sort of thing has been going on in Mexico for decades. You can pretty much assume any politician in Mexico is captured by the cartel, either through extortion or funding.
Now, you'd think that would mean they would love for Murica to swing down with the hammer of justice but it's really hard to say "Yeah come kill these guys" when they have a gun up to your son's head. The Mexican people would probably be all for it so long as they weren't caught in the crossfire but actually getting the permission to go in and do it will basically never come. And it's a hard sell for most Americans to want to deploy our military just to "play police" in Central America. It's complicated.
Putting downward pressure economically doesn't really work either, since most of the cartel's money comes from illegal sources anyway. Primarily drug trade and human trafficking. But a solid chunk of it is also extortion and racketeering. We'd have to identify where their drugs are coming from first. Sure a fair amount is probably coming out of the middle east, but Africa has a lot of places that produce various substances and Asia does as well. To say nothing of South America. Basically anywhere with a jungle is producing something.
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:qBPfFoYW Sun 16 Mar 2025 20:37:59 No. 6213655 Report >>6213647 That’s true.
I’ll strike that off the escalation. But I think we should do things like pressure companies that work with these guys and pressure nations.
Save the blockades for if someone decide to hand them WMDs or hide significant leaders in their countries.
Also ‘’significant depomatic consequences’’ gives us a fair bit of flexibility.
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:qBPfFoYW Sun 16 Mar 2025 20:42:04 No. 6213657 Report Quoted By:
Rolled 9 (1d9) Rolling for operations
Anonymous
>>6213655 Yeah that's fair. If (when) it gets out that a nation is funding or supplying the MFSA we should absolutely menace them. Can't have a bunch of nations forgetting that America's military spending is more than most countries' GDPs and getting ideas. I'm sure there have been a lot of backroom deals and quiet phonecalls shifting alliances and stances across the globe.
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:qBPfFoYW Sun 16 Mar 2025 21:04:01 No. 6213676 Report Quoted By:
>>6213659 100%.
The diplomatic channels are to give nations out- to save face. After that I say if a nation want to come forward- they got to do it live, in public. Then admitting to supporting these guys will be put on our YouTube channel.
Us being willing to look at something as a mistake is us being precise, it’s the denial, or even doubling down that makes you a target.
‘’the boys in the pentagon have been playing with some ideas for precision weapons, it’s your choice if MFSA or YOU sees them first’’.
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:qBPfFoYW Sun 16 Mar 2025 21:19:46 No. 6213684 Report Quoted By:
The escalation of Resources denial would probably look like this; Step one: direct criminal connections; Arms dealers, drug dealing intermediaries (individuals specifically if going after the org is too much), money laundering. Stockpiles that are relitivly isolated. Step 2; phase 1 political and economic pressure on supporting nations, Companies, domestic criminal organizations, safe havens that knowingly aid the terrorists. Step 3+; full on sanctions, arrest warrants for any cargo vessel using the ports of sanctioned nations, companies fined or domestically confiscated for non-compliance to the 1st, 2nd, 3rd+ degrees. Withdrawals of freedom of the waves protections, pressures on the UN, world bank, and other international organizations to end all but the most critical of humanitarian operations for the nations.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6213591 >No. They have what’s coming for them, but I already have too much on my plate already. I can’t add more to it right now. Once things have calmed down here at home, I will bring them justice. Going into Iraq again? lmao
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
Quoted By:
Yes appears to have it. I’ll compile the specifics the best I can and then write an update. Locking in.
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
Quoted By:
Update won’t be out today. Hopefully tomorrow.
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
You make up your mind very quickly and without much hesitation. Yes, now is the time. You’ve spent too long as it is putting the MFSA off, chasing after the culprits in your own borders. It’s time for you to cut the head off of the snake. Even if you don’t put out any statements, some things just can’t be hidden for long. The press caught on quickly once military higher-ups started coming and going to and from the White House in greater number. The Pizza Index is at an all time high, beating out March 20th 2003, October 7th 2001, and January 17th, 1991. Headlines plasters the newspapers, the TV, social media, everywhere. War is coming. You spend all day sitting down with the most experienced generals and commanders in the country to discuss a plan on how to bring Rajab al-Hai to justice. From morning until night, you’re running around the White House and the Pentagon, brainstorming, brainstorming, brainstorming. You hardly get any time to sleep. Maybe only one or two hours at a time on the couch. You live off of cheap, black coffee and greasy, takeout pizza. You haven’t taken a shower in days. But finally, you have something, and it is named Operation Judgement Day. ~ FEBRUARY 17 2012 ~ You spent the morning freshening yourself up after the long slog that was war preparation. Then you made a series of calls to President of Iraq Abbaad al-Abdalla as well as the King of Saudi Arabia, Aamir el-Habib. The latter was eager receive your assistance in driving MFSA forces out of his borders while the former took some strong arming, but eventually fell in line. Then you put out an official statement confirming the capture of four of the nine domestic terrorists that were in hiding in Davenport, Iowa. None of them as high-profile as Cecil. Now that just leaves two groups of people to address. The United Nations and Congress. Just after noon in Washington, you put out a written statement. In short, you address the nation states across the globe as a whole. You tell them that they have the chance to admit aiding MFSA through diplomatic channels in the next 24 hours, and if they don’t then they will face consequences. Of course, you intentionally left the consequences vague and open-ended. You don’t have time to look at the immediate global reaction to your ultimatum before the secret service drives you to the Capitol, which is still in the process of being repaired. “…” As you walk into the under-construction Capitol building, you are met with a fully restored senate, the 21 surviving congressmen and women, and an army of the press that would’ve put the mongols to shame. Everyone has their eyes on you as you approach the podium, right where the president before you addressed Congress almost an entire month ago, just before… (1/2)
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
Quoted By:
“Thank you all for coming here today. I’m sorry for running a bit late.” You wipe a finger along the side of your eye. Everyone waits expectantly while you take a sip of water before you continue. “In this very room, just a mere 24 days ago, the course of this nation has been irrevocably changed. This was the worst terrorist attack since September 11th, and one I’m confident we will not be forgetting for the rest of our earthly lives.” Solemn nods fill the room. Behind you, the vice president is heard whispering “Amen” as he signs a cross on his chest. “1,038. That is how many people had perished on that day, January 24th, 2012. That’s is how many people were brutally, unjustifiably murdered. And we know now who the people who are responsible for this attack are. The MFSA, led by Rajab al-Hai.” Murmurs of contempt and scorn are shared among the 121 attendees of this joint session as they look up at you, knowing where this will lead. “There is a burning anger within every American right now. There has been for almost a month now. They’ve been waiting, and waiting, and waiting, and they’ve been waiting long enough. It’s not enough for us to bring the dozen terrorists within our own borders to justice. The ones who employed them are sitting in their bunkers right now, continuing to wage war on their neighbors and daring to threaten the United States and its allies with further attacks. These people are despicable in every sense of the word, and their terror can stand no longer. I will not rest until I know that the ones who stripped parents from their children, husbands from their wives, and brothers from their sisters have been completely and unquestionably brought down.” You pause, taking in the weight of the next words that will come out of your mouth. “That is why, on this day, I demand that this Congress declare that a state of war has existed between the United States and the MFSA-” The applause is immediate and deafening. Every seat is made vacant as Congress stands up and begins slapping their hands together. A few of them bring a hand to their lips and draw out a long whistle in approval. Your demand is met with passionate, unanimous standing ovation. “-…and anyone else who sides with them shall meet our same military might. Thank you.” The next hour of the two branches of government signing a declaration of war are simply nothing but formality. Not one objection is raised. It’s official. You are officially at war. Operation Judgement Day has begun. (2/2)
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
Quoted By:
No vote today. You get back to work tomorrow.
Anonymous
>>6214573 >The Pizza Index is at an all time high, Man that is so fucking funny. It's something that sounds so silly but it's a thing.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6214580 >Chat we must avoid any possible leaks >Forgot about the pizza index Chat: "God damn it we missed another leak. Go to war before they run."
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
Quoted By:
>>6214580 >Big Mac Index >Waffle House Index >Stripper Index The best index is a silly index.
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:4lkRXeWp Tue 18 Mar 2025 19:39:09 No. 6214584 Report >>6214580 Who do you think will be the first one to admit to us that they gave some funding to these bozos?
Honestly I think we should have the offical response to them being ‘’thank you for coming forward, provide us all the intel you have on these guys and it’ll be water under the bridge’’.
Anonymous
>>6214584 Real shit? Not a fucking one is gonna respond to that. I know I wouldn't. I'd be burning all records and hoping no one finds out lmao. It's like hearing "I won't be mad if you tell me the truth" from your parents. Even if they really don't get mad you just know you're still gonna get punished.
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:na0i3GGD Wed 19 Mar 2025 01:34:23 No. 6214692 Report Quoted By:
>>6214595 Honestly I agree- but at the same time I don’t think anyone ever made a demand like this at the UN,
I could see at most someone at being like ‘’we think we found some indication, we need some time to verify’’ or something.
But depending on the extent I can see this being a ‘’all treaties are void’’ kind of situation. If nothing else I think for those that we know they have we should hand them letters just saying;
‘’We Know, We will let you admit it publicly instead of privately like you had the chance to’’
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
No vote today either, actually. Apologies. I will take a 1d5 (worst of 3) for the ongoing manhunt, though.
Anonymous
Rolled 4 (1d5) >>6214929 >inb4 1 DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:a8hRyA9/ Wed 19 Mar 2025 19:26:47 No. 6214958 Report Rolled 1 (1d4) >>6214945 I still think we should do ‘’radio side chats’’ via YouTube where we have an aid go through questions and pick some that would be most appropriate to answer. Have the videos be like a half a hour or something.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6214958 What kind of weirdo would tune in to political stuff though, amirite guys?
You used the wrong dice by the way. Anonymous
Quoted By:
Rolled 5 (1d5) >>6214929 Rolling.
>>6214958 Good thing you used the wrong dice. Now watch me get a 1
Anonymous
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:7eabwfqn Wed 19 Mar 2025 22:52:40 No. 6215047 Report Ok we got a 1, 5, and a 5, no one else roll!
Anonymous
>>6215047 I think you are a little confused.
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:Xqw90Okg Wed 19 Mar 2025 23:44:52 No. 6215078 Report Quoted By:
>>6215069 That’s just my normal state
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
~ FEBRUARY 18 2012 ~ After the widely broadcast declaration of war against the MFSA had been signed, you took a much needed rest. A full seven (you’ve given up on a full eight since being sworn in) hours of sleep followed your joint session with Congress, this time in your own bed and with your own wife. It’s now the crack of dawn and it’s time for you to get right back to work. No time to waste when the fate of the nation is on your shoulders. You sit down in the oval desk and flip through a list of today’s issues. Most of it is standard, procedural junk or things that will cycle through the news for a few days then fade into obscurity. What does catch your eye is a list of names. Four, to be precise. Four of the names that had been pulled from Cecil Beynon’s lips had been successfully apprehended in an abandoned warehouse in Hesperia, California and put in confinement until their military tribunal is scheduled. That just leaves one final terrorist to catch. One person left to chase down. Honestly, you’re surprised with how quickly that national intelligence has managed to track down and capture all of them alive. At this rate, you might just have someone call you in minutes to inform that the last man has been located and they’re closing in. But that doesn’t happen. Not during the time it takes for you to speedily sign your name on each of the morning documents, anyways. Right as you’re in the middle of signing the last paper in the pile, your phone rings. “Yes?” “You’re being requested at the situation room, Mr. President.” Moments later, you’re walking into the situation where you are met by the familiar sight of nondescript men and women in either a plain black and white suit or green, medaled uniform. “We’re in the process of mobilizing the Air Force, sir. We’ve gotten permission from the Saudi government to use their military bases as a launching pad for aerial strikes against the MFSA.” “Good, good. How long will this take?” “The Air Force should be fully prepared to strike in the next two or three days, sir.” “Alright. Is that all you wanted me here for?” The generals look at each other for a second before they look back at you. “Mr. President, it’s my opinion that we should be requesting the aid of our allies for this. Some of the people at this table might call it overkill, but we should take no chances.” “I disagree, Mr. President. We don’t need any other military power for this. Saudi assistance and Iraqi permission is more than enough. It would just cause us more trouble to involve other nations in this affair.” Right now, for all intents and purposes, you are fighting this war all by yourself. This has its merits and faults, and it all depends on whether you think the MFSA is a large enough threat to warrant a coalition. >I will call our allies and ask for their support in this war. >We don’t need them. We’ll wipe the MFSA out alone.
Anonymous
>>6215505 >>We don’t need them. We’ll wipe the MFSA out alone. Anonymous
>>6215505 >We don’t need them. We’ll wipe the MFSA out alone. Including allies would lead to terror attacks in Europe. They'll already have trouble handling the refugees.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6215561 +1
Yeah we failed to stop another war on terror so lets avoid causing more unnecessary casualties
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:xB0cyEnk Fri 21 Mar 2025 02:54:55 No. 6215713 Report Quoted By:
>>6215522 Support.
Kinda want to drop a MOAB or something on these terrorists.
Mainly I think we should just let local nations do the occupying. Send in the Seals, not a occupation.
Anonymous
That last guy on the wanted list must be in a perpetual state of shitting his pants. Good lord Foster is doing suspiciously well.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6215505 >>We don’t need them. We’ll wipe the MFSA out alone. Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6215505 >We don’t need them. We’ll wipe the MFSA out alone. We have all the capabilities we need and don't want to drag them into this - this one's personal. We're hardly toppling a country's government this time. At the moment, anyway.
Anonymous
>>6215728 I am surprised there were not more moles in the country and they didn't escape while they had the chance. Was al-hai bluffing about more terror strikes or does he actually have the second wave preparing?
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
Quoted By:
Looks like you’ll be at this alone. Locking in.
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:M2j4KBP4 Sat 22 Mar 2025 16:50:16 No. 6216420 Report >>6215939 That is strange. I wonder what intel on the planning we were able to get?
Like- was the goal a total decapication? Why did these moles go along with it?
Anonymous
>>6216420 I recall that a common "goal" of Islamist terrorism isn't necessarily in the act itself or its effects, but the repercussions it brings as a symbolic act, whether that's political domestically as a deterrence factor (OBL's motives for 9/11 were to try and shock the US into recoiling away from the Middle East and Israel, for example - sound familiar?) or, for the more ambitious, a rallying cry for Muslims to rise up in jihad or to provoke a violent, repressive response that incites this outcome or some other damaging outcome for the target. The fact that the US has been temporarily decapitated is unimportant, it's what we do next that matters and is why we need to tread so carefully.
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:7yqZTNDd Sat 22 Mar 2025 17:02:56 No. 6216425 Report >>6216422 I mean more so the moles and useful idiots that decided to betray their countrymen. Why did they help these terrorists try to start a religious war?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6216425 I suspect they may have had some kind of strong personal leverage over Cecil or he didn't quite twig what exactly he was partaking in. The associates may have been bona fide belief terrorists, or in the same boat as him.
But surely "why'd you do it" must have been one of the first questions they asked him and the others so I imagine we'll get told at some point, even if is ultimately of less importance since both the attack and their capture is a fait accompli. Still, there will be domestic security lessons to learn.
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
“No. We don’t need any foreign assistance. It’ll just overcomplicate this whole ordeal even more.” One general releases a sigh of defeat. The other’s chest subtly puffs up in pride. “Is everything else going according to plan?” “It is so far, sir. The troops have mobilized efficiently and without any major problems arising. On our current course, we’ll be sending drones into MFSA territory by the Wednesday.” You push your chair back and stand up. Everyone else does moments afterwards. “Thank you, General. As for the rest of you, inform me the moment something goes wrong.” A cacophony of confirmation follows. You nod your head and depart from the situation room. >Roll a 1d20 for the military’s movement to Saudi Arabia. Best of 3. DC: 10. ~ FEBRUARY 19 2012 ~ While you wait for news on Operation Judgement Day, going through the motions of signing papers and a member of your campaign staff gives you a call. “I sent you a file, Mr. President.” You turn to your laptop and crack it open. You scroll and click until your reach your email and open the file. “What’s this?” “I decided to compile all of the current polling data. These are, more or less, the average results right now. It goes without saying that it could change depending on who the parties eventually decide to nominate.” “I see…” It’s closer than you would like. You’re up by point in this graph, but according to the person on the other end of the phone this is only the best case scenario. You can only assume this means none of the other scenarios have you leading. “The, uh…the third parties. Why are they so high? I thought we were pining for their vote.” “We are, sir. It’s just that…well, we can’t approach these people the same way we court Republican and Democratic voters.” “What do you mean?” “What I mean is…for instance, you know that most people have approved of your response to the attack, but the LP is in that minority. The state of emergency, the national manhunt, and some of your policy decisions have left a bad taste in their mouths.” “And the greens?” “They’re more simple, sir. They just don’t see you as someone who would pass some radical environmental reform, which is kinda their whole thing.” “Right, right, well…” You recline into your chair. Your campaign is still working on its polling infrastructure, so you don’t actually know what the spread of your supporters looks like at the moment. You don’t know if most of your supporters would’ve voted third party or not, so the only information you have to utilize at this moment is this graph. Of course, this graph only shows everyone’s first choice for president. People are still trying to adapt to the radical, new electoral system that’s being implemented, including the pollsters. Perhaps all of those third party voters have you written in 2nd place. Perhaps not. Is this a chance you wish to take?
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
>I don’t need to worry about them right now. I’m sure it’ll all work out for me in the end. Just keep the current strategy going. >Whatever we’re doing to appeal to them, we need more of it. Double down. >We need to change our approach. I need to give some sort of concessions. Campaign promises and such. >We need to change our approach. I need to meet with the parties’ leadership. I’m positive we could come to some sort of agreement. >Let’s just scratch this whole thing. We need to focus on targeting a different voting group. (Which group exactly?) >Write-in.
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:+UzqaoyB Sat 22 Mar 2025 18:08:18 No. 6216464 Report >>6216442 Not voting yet- but why don’t we appeal to the ‘’lesser evil’’ voters of the Red and Blue and target the Greens and Libertarians by arguing that this is the best chance to get some change to happen?
More or less campaign on the idea of a better system than the better of 2 turds.
for the Libertarians, highlight how we respect states rights on the manner of the lockdowns and state that during our presidency we will continue to show such respect to States rights.
Anonymous
>>6216442 I believe we should cast a wider net by appealing to both democrats and Republicans unhappy with the current state of their parties. I doubt that we've still got them all.
Anonymous
Rolled 11 (1d20) >>6216441 Let's go gambling.
Anonymous
Rolled 6 (1d20) >>6216441 We can't attract voters without a stance. Like what are the new current issues facing America right now? We need to know what are the problems to then address it as we now have a record of major reform.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Rolled 10 (1d20) >>6216442 >Whatever we’re doing to appeal to them, we need more of it. Double down. Anonymous
Unfortunately, we seem to have left the competent military guy in Canada.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6216682 Pretty sure 11 is still a succes.
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
Quoted By:
>>6216464 >>6216468 >>6216505 >>6216532 >Argue to GOP & Dem voters that you’re more than just a “lesser of two evils.” >Argue to Lib & Green voters that you’re the best chance for some change to occur. >Argue to the Libs your respect to state’s rights. >Officialize a platform. Locking these in. You’ll get the chance to determine your campaign platform in this next post.
>11 Pass, but only barely.
Anonymous
>>6216441 >People are still trying to adapt to the radical, new electoral system that’s being implemented, including the pollsters. Perhaps all of those third party voters have you written in 2nd place. Perhaps not. Is this a chance you wish to take? Congress doesn't have jurisdiction over how States run Presidential elections. There should be Court cases about the legality of this.
Portions of the VRA held up because the court interpreted them as enforcements for constitutional amendments.
I don't know how we argue the legality of this act to a nonstacked Court, but I think it should be brought up in-game.
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:CpQOGl/B Sun 23 Mar 2025 21:09:55 No. 6217144 Report Quoted By:
>>6217134 I agree, there’s probably already a few states preparing for such objections.
I could see a ‘’living document’’ argument being used to defend it, or during the next administration being turned into an amendment if approved. Or become a very interesting instance in the history of US law in the future should it be rejected.
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
Quoted By:
“Let’s change our approach, then. We’re clearly not going enough. These third parties are the key to this election.” For nearly the next hour and a half, you and the staffer are on the phone and workshop ways to court the third party vote. It isn’t one continuous hour and a half, since you are still the president. You’re juggling between official, head of state business and campaign planning, but by the time that things start to die down in the White House, you have a generalized plan that you’re confident in handing over to your campaign so they can work out the details. There are millions of Americans in today’s political climate who only begrudgingly vote for a candidate because they are the “lesser of two evils,” and millions more who simply don’t vote at all in order to avoid voting for evil in the first place. You just need to successfully portray yourself as an honest-to-goodness alternative and hope that your passing of compulsory voting doesn’t leave a sour note to this previously untapped demographic. The ones who are planning to vote for a third party candidate, more than anyone, want to see the two-party system completely shredded beyond recovery. It may still be floating through one federal court at a time and will inevitably end up in the highest of them all, but with the way things are looking, there’s a non-zero chance that it gets implemented before early voting begins and it’ll be because of you. They’re surely to remember that. But even then, there are still plenty who are hesitant to vote for you for a variety of reasons, as seen by the chart that was emailed to you earlier. That’s why you intend to remind them that you’re currently their best chance at driving the final nail into the coffin that is the two party system. Not only that, but you’ll specifically remind the Libertarian demographic about your respect towards state’s rights during the crisis. Unfortunately for the Green Party, you don’t intend to give them any concessions yet. With that out of the way, one thing that has remained fuzzy during your campaign and is surely diverting voters towards other candidates is your lack of a concrete platform. You obviously have your record and your post-attack response, but that can only take you so far. To win a full term, you need goals. Things that you’ll promise to do over the next four years. But what would a full term of a Foster administration look like? (1/2)
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
First, you need to think about what issues are currently on the people’s minds the most and how you’ll approach them.>The war on the MFSA, officially titled Operation Judgement Day. It’s clear to many what your opinion on this is, considering you’re leading the damn thing. Most people are in support of this war, but it should be noted that some are both skeptical and hesitant regarding how you and the government plan on handling it, especially once all is said and done. The war in Iraq is still fresh on everybody’s minds, and now we’re re-entering the country just a couple of months after we left. People are rightfully worried. (Write-in or skip.) >Government overreach. With the states of emergency that some parts of the country had failed to enact and the nationwide manhunt taking place, the countrywide conversation has shifted towards how much federal action is justified during a disaster such as this. (Write-in or skip.) >Electoral reform. Your policies regarding the electoral process in federal elections has been quite controversial, with an even share of supporters and detractors. Most people obviously know your opinion on this, considering you’re the one who single-handedly thrust this topic into the spotlight with your radical reform. But you’ve already done a lot in this regard, so is there really anything else to do here besides defend what you’ve already tried to accomplish? (Write-in or skip.) >Gay marriage. This is one that has already been the topic of debate since before the bombing of the Capitol, but it’s no less discussed. Six states plus DC have already had gay marriage legalized, but the vast majority of the country still does not allow it. Some argue for it to be a federally protected right, some argue that marriage should strictly be defined as between a man and a woman, some want to leave this decision in the hands of the states…it’s a tough topic to approach, if you even wish to approach it at all. (Write-in or skip.) With the most pressing issues addressed, now you can work on some other campaign promises to make. Things that, while not the hottest topic at the moment, are no less important to the nation’s well being. >Write-in. (2/2)
Anonymous
>>6217542 >The war on the MFSA, The best thing to do here is to talk about how we simply cannot let such an terrorist act go unpunished, because if we do, every other terrorist group in the world will want to do the same. We *need* to eradicate the MFSA in order to show that such attacks will not be tolerated.
>Government overreach. First of all, acknowledge that the history of governments using a crisis to seize more power is vast. Reassure the people that we are only passing whatever is necessary to deal with such a historical crisis, and that if we are re-elected, we will avail the government of such powers as soon as the MFSA is defeated. Promise this in public. That ought to win them over.
>Electoral reform Just defend it; make it known that a democracy simply cannot work if people don't care enough to so much as vote, and thus, participation is the most important thing a citizen can do
>Gay marriage. States issue. The states pass what they think is right; this is what we said we would do, no? Passing a law to legalize it federally would be going against what we just said.
Personally I would prefer to just illegalize it outright, but again, that would be against what we said we would do. Anonymous
>>6217548 +1 all sounds good.
We could promise to repeal the patriot act after the war with MFSA and curb FBI, CIA, and NSA overreach since it as anon said didn't stop the one thing it was founded to stop. We reinforce whistleblower laws and state rights but I can't think of what else we can do to lower govt overreach. What about scuttling guantanamo bay in Cuba or reducing military spending to focus on infrastructure?
Anonymous
>>6217610 We probably shouldn't talk about doing too gigantic changes while they can still use the MFSA as an easy excuse for an assassination.
Basically, start with other stuff and wait until we're simply too popular to kill
Anonymous
>>6217611 This just made me realize, the Islamic hate in the U.S. here is probably going to fucking explode. I wouldn't be surprised if a ton of protests start cropping up about getting them out of the country. I mean 9/11 was a nightmare so this has to be an absolute night terror in terms of implicit threats to America as a whole. The fact the MFSA operate out of the middle east is enough to make some of the rowdier types mondo bigmad. Civil unrest might be something we need to issue in a second.
Anonymous
>>6217616 Haaah, you just reminded me that this event happened in a post "Never again" universe. Lol.
Anonymous
>>6217617 >Never Again (but we mean it this time) Anonymous
>>6217643 >Never Again 2: Nuclear Boogaloo Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6217646 >Never Again 3: solar eclipse Anonymous
I would like to propose a bill. Anons please tell me if this is trash or not: At the end of a president's term, have there be a popular vote in all of America to decide whether or not the president did a good job in office. If he did do a good job, then things go as normal. If he didn't, then he gets no money and goes to jail for at least 8 years.
Maybe we can include it in the speech? Say that we'll try to pass it through to prove we aren't being tyrannical, and willing to hold ourselves accountable for our actions.
>>6217542 >Operation Judgement Day A necessary action, as unpalatable as it was. We need to prove that America isn't just going to take a terror attack sitting down, lest other countries are willing to do the same.
>Government overreach Recent events proved that America needs a strong leader to make sure the nation doesn't fall into panic. We will humbly take this great honor with the respect it deserves. Government overreach doesn't come from the executive, but from unelected business leaders and the so-called "non-profit organizations". And we will fight to make sure there is more transparency in the government, and that the people can actually make a difference instead of putting things in the hands of career politicians and the interests of unelected people with more influence than they should have.
>Electoral reform This shouldn't be as controversial as it is. We can't have a democracy if the people don't care about it.
>Gay marriage Promise that you'll institute a federal wide ban on gay marriage.
Republicans are the ones that want to leave it to the states and want to focus more on the economy, if I remember correctly. We have the opportunity to take from their core voting bloc and divide them, especially because gay marriage isn't popular with the vast majority of Americans.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6217921 >countries *terrorists
Probably a mistake to call the MFSA a country kek
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6217921 Believe me anon, I'd love to ban gay marriage, but I don't want to go immediately against what we said about leaving states right untouched. At least it's better than making it federally legal.
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
Quoted By:
>>6217548 This option appears slightly more popular, so I’ll lock this one in.
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
Quoted By:
Your campaign platform is simple. Let your record speak for itself. You will remain firm on your dedication to removing the MFSA from the Earth before they can execute another terrorist attack on American soil. You will reassure the people that you serve that these emergency measures will only exist during the, well…the emergency and will be done with the moment you get the chance. You’re not particularly confident that many people will buy that, but it’s better than saying “No, we’re gonna keep these measures up forever.” You will defend your radical electoral reform, whether it passes through the Supreme Court or not. This was the only opportunity to try and fix a broken electoral system, and you took it. You have no shame in that. And as for the topic of gay marriage that everyone is still fussing about, you will take a moderate approach while sticking to being respectful towards state’s rights. This might hold some of your base support over for now, but eventually you will need more to keep them around for your campaign. ~ FEBRUARY 28 2012 ~ “Ahem…good evening, my fellow Americans.” You are standing on the entrance to the White House, and in front of you stands a swarm of reporters with their notepads at the ready. Dozens of cameras are pointed at you, and you are continuously flashbanged with the sudden light of a picture being taken of you. “Earlier today, the United States military has begun to conduct operations on Saudi Arabia’s Northern Borders Province, where MFSA forces are currently contesting for control. Using state of the art drone technology, we have executed multiple targeted strikes on MFSA locations, killing multiple enemy combatants.” You’re almost shocked at how easy it has become for you to speak about such things in front of a national audience. You’ve only been in office for a month and four days, but it feels like a year has passed already. “Just a few hours ago, the military had begun to warn civilians in the area that their best course of action is to flee any areas that are known to hide MFSA members via dropping flyers from the air and hijacking radio stations. Now, the military has begun attacks on key urban locations that are under the authority of the MFSA in hopes of forcing them out.” You would’ve loved to begin going on the offensive earlier, but there were some delays. But as long as al-Hai is still reported to be somewhere in Iraq, then a few days is nothing. Especially considering that this job might take years, if previous operations in the Middle East are anything to go by. “I ask the people all over this country to take a moment to pray for the brave men and women who are about to fight overseas, and who will put their lives on the line to protect our nation. Thank you, and may God bless America.” (1/2)
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
With that out of the way, you make your exit from the podium and back into the White House to continue your work. While you are kept up to date on the events of Operation Judgement Day, you don’t necessarily need to be at the White House to respond if anything needs your immediate attention. With another momentary surge in your approval ratings after the troops had set up camp in Saudi military bases, you figure this would be a good time to do another tour. But where, pray tell, will that tour take place?>The Rust Belt. There’s a region that is filled to the brim with cynical, undecided voters that will ultimately vote for whoever campaigns there the hardest. Showing up this early would surely bode well with some of them. I reckon that this year, this place will become a battleground. >The south. My campaign numbers appear to be lacking in the land of Dixie when compared to other regions, so it would be good for me if I could go and show them some love. It would help my bottom line and should siphon some votes from the Republicans. >New England. This region is filled to the brim with progressive voters, and I’m already polling well thanks to the help I gave Vermont a while ago. If I could campaign on that while there alongside my progressive electoral reform, I might be able to bring some of them to my side and away from the Democrats. >The northwestern states traditionally vote more for third party candidates than the rest of the country, and considering how much I’m attempting to court their vote, it would be in character to visit these states. They may be small, but every vote counts in this election. Especially if ranked-choice goes through. >The southwest. It worked fine last time, who’s to say it won’t work fine again? People like me more here, especially in Colorado, and with California and Texas sitting on either side of this region, there’s a lot of votes to be earned here. With the possibility of the Electoral College being thrown out, these votes states will matter a lot. >I don’t need to do another tour, actually. I’ll put that time and money into ads on TV and the internet. Those can reach across the whole country without me having to even step foot outside DC. >Write-in. (2/2)
Anonymous
>>6218389 >>The Rust Belt. There’s a region that is filled to the brim with cynical, undecided voters that will ultimately vote for whoever campaigns there the hardest. Showing up this early would surely bode well with some of them. I reckon that this year, this place will become a battleground. The reps and dems will fight for this new untapped market so better get ahead of them and secure their votes. Plus they would be our harshest critics so we can get back feedback and address their problems since we are forcing them to vote.
Also another war on terror and another generation wasted for the next decade.
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6218389 >The Rust Belt. There’s a region that is filled to the brim with cynical, undecided voters that will ultimately vote for whoever campaigns there the hardest. Showing up this early would surely bode well with some of them. I reckon that this year, this place will become a battleground. >Also make some ads on the internet. AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
Quoted By:
Locking in a tour of the rust belt, plus one or two online ads with some leftover funds.
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
Last time you visited your home region of the southwest, which was a relatively safe choice. This time you will tour through the recently more competitive region that is the Rust Belt. On the same day as Operation Judgement Day begins, you announce your intention to tour through these states and hold a series of rallies and events in the big cities. Your campaign works in overdrive to organize the events. What will be held, where they will be held, how you will drive to and from these spots, etc. But eventually, you’re out on the road just a few days later. ~ MARCH 9 2012 ~ From Philadelphia to Columbus, then to Detroit and then Indianapolis, your second tour on the campaign trail is ending up much more organized than your first. Buses drive people from out of town into your rallies. The crowds of makeshift signs and drawn-on shirts are now replaced with official merch, professionally made. The people who look up to you as you speak on the stage come from all walks of life. Elderly retirees, middle-aged factory workers, college students, just to name a few. Some of them want a return to normalcy. Some of them want a man who will uproot a decaying system and build it anew. All of them are supporting you. Now you are speaking to thousands of supporters in the heart of Chicago, Illinois. Your second to last stop on this tour. In any other scenario, you would be a completely forgettable man in a suit who drops out before the primaries. But now, after everything that has occurred up to this point, you’re a star in these people’s eyes. You’ve made enemies, but that’s expected in politics. You’re still barely polling ahead of the Democratic and Republican parties and there’s a good few candidates in the running who could beat you in the polls as it stands if they win the nomination, that’s all true. But there’s a growing air of optimism among the crowd. Hope. “Thank you, thank you. Now listen, I want to make this very clear to you guys. We may not bring al-Hai down tomorrow, or the day after that, or the day after that. We might not bring him down in this year or the next, even. But I promise you this; if there’s one thing that I’m confident in, it’s this country. As Jack Kennedy once said, “The cost of freedom is always high, but Americans have always paid it.” And so help me God, we will-” You hear what sounds like a firecracker go off near the front row. A sudden, sharp pain fills your chest. Your hands clutch your body and you look down at yourself to see blood staining your suit. The sounds of ensuing panic and mayhem grow numb in your ears as you collapse onto the stage and fall unconscious. The last thing you see before blacking out is secret service agents surrounding you.>Roll 1d20. One roll per Anon. DC: ???
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Rolled 3 (1d20) >>6219346 Oof, aspen-sassination.
Whelp, time for Never Again(tm) 3!
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Rolled 13 (1d20) >>6219346 Lol, it's happening again...
Anonymous
Rolled 14 (1d20) >>6219346 Oh SHIT. We weren't even wearing our nicest suit, we can't die in this one.
Anonymous
>>6219370 On the bright side, if we survive, that'll be one hell of a propaganda tool, getting an assassination attempt usually makes you popular.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6219372 >My fellow Americans, as you can see I am not Teddy Roosevelt. I can not deliver a speech with a bullet in me. However I am still alive. For real though. Damn.
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:SO5Fz254 Fri 28 Mar 2025 20:29:04 No. 6219439 Report Quoted By:
Rolled 11 (1d20) >>’’Look man, if you didn’t like what I’m doing- you could have waited for the election’’
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Whelp, looks like our VP is going to get the dubious honor of getting "46th President of the United States" on his Wikipedia page before retirement.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
On the bright side, at least our reforms are probably safe. It would be kind of bad optics to touch the dead guy's stuff.
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:g/IsdGgX Fri 28 Mar 2025 21:18:35 No. 6219450 Report So- who’s placing bets on what flavor of nutjob shot at us? My money is Loan Wolf of some kind. I doubt that people will wait to hear what flavor this guy is before they start doing post 9/11 stuff again.
Anonymous
>>6219450 >inb4 it was the last guy on the traitor list that we didn't manage to nab Anonymous
Rolled 19 (1d20) >>6219346 Shame we can't do a Theodore Roosevelt
>Captcha: GWOMN No, I don't think it was a gender-flipped G-Man.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6219475 >Time, President Aspen? >Is it really that time again? Anonymous
Rolled 18 (1d20) >>6219346 It takes more to kill a honest guy fixing a broken down country my friends. Looks like some people want it to stay broken down, but here I stand. resurrected from the ashes.
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:cyn9pAFp Sat 29 Mar 2025 00:28:19 No. 6219500 Report Quoted By:
>>6219475 *got a 19*
Maybe we can finish the speach after all.
I say we save the bullet and make it into a necklace we wears. We’re the Lorax that lives.
Anonymous
/pol/ is going to have an absolute field day with this one.
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:qBPfFoYW Sat 29 Mar 2025 01:09:31 No. 6219507 Report Quoted By:
>>6219503 >> Yo they shot the Lorax >> Is he dead? >>THE LORAX LIVES >> this has to be a phyops Anonymous
>>6219503 I'm sure they would be calling the entire thing a psyops and Aspen a state-controlled puppet.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Rolled 16 (1d20) >>6219510 Aspen is not a state-controlled puppet. He is a plant by foreign nationals to weaken democracy and uproot its normalcy.
>>6219503 Holy shit Aspen isn't a normal fed he is actually a Kennedy after getting shot for quoting him.
Anonymous
>>6219459 inb4 our manhunt rolls were lowering the assassination DC to beat as we hunted down all the terrorists.
>>6219450 The last terrorist as we didn't pull a United Health on the public.
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:qBPfFoYW Sat 29 Mar 2025 01:44:21 No. 6219524 Report >>6219520 Honestly narratively makes sense.
I think we are going to win this election.
We are a wartime president, a crisis president, and a president who just survived an assassination.
We are the mighty American Oak!
Anonymous
>>6219524 >We are the mighty American Oak! Nah, Redwood. It thrives after a fire. Nothing takes them down.
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:qBPfFoYW Sat 29 Mar 2025 02:14:17 No. 6219542 Report Quoted By:
>>6219538 It’s but a bark wound.
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
>>6219482 >>6219475 DC: 18
Passing rolls: 2
Locking in.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6219814 THE SEQUOIA STANDS
Anonymous
>>6219814 >>6219482 My name ASPEN is AND ASPEN IS KNOWN FOR BEING USED FOR MATCHES AND MY FLAME WILL BURN BRIGHT AND LONG JUST LIKE YOURS WILL BE! LET ME BE THE MATCH THAT LIGHTS THE WAY FOR THE WHOLE OF AMERICA!
Would be nice for a speech ending.
Anonymous
>>6220010 >My name ASPEN is Fuck meant
My name is ASPEN
Anonymous
>>6220011 Injured out brain, the bullet did. When bloodflow from our heart, it ceased.
Anonymous
>>6220011 >Aspen, my name is we will complete our ascension by speaking like Yoda
Anonymous
>>6220019 Silenced my voiced will not be. Heard my voice America has.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6220019 >>6220020 >>6220074 All fair points have you all given
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
Quoted By:
~ ????? ? ???? ~ You wake up. Everything is blurry. Noises are dull and incomprehensible. Cold, harsh lights whir by you. You can’t feel your legs, but you think you’re lying down. Men and women wearing masks and gloves are surrounding you. You go unconscious. ~ ????? ?? ???? ~ You wake up. You still can’t make anything out except for foggy colors hovering in front of your glossy eyes and the jumbled together sounds that fail to stick inside your ears. Something- no, multiple somethings are puncturing your wrists. Your chest is rising and falling so feebly, and you have some tubes shoved into your nostrils. You don’t feel any pain. You don’t feel any discomfort, either. You go unconscious. ~ ????? ?? ???? ~ You wake up. You can sense things a little more clearly now, though it still feels like there’s a veil covering you from seeing and hearing everything at its best. You’re in a hospital room. A monitor right outside your line of vision beeps rhythmically. Your eyes creak to the corner of the room. You see a woman hunched over in a chair, hands covering her face. Someone else in a white jacket is standing over her, palm on her shoulder. You go unconscious. ~ ????? ?? ???? ~ You wake up. You go uncon- “Urgh…” No. This time, you find it in yourself to stay awake. You still feel exhausted, but you can force your eyes open at least. Whatever film had been draped over your head, muting your sense of hearing and fogging your sense of sight, is mostly lifted by this point. The sun is glimmering against the wide, glass window to your left and on the right, in the corner, is the same woman from before, reading a book. Now, you’re at least capable of making out who it is. “Meredith…” She looks up towards you, nearly dropping her book before running over and practically tossing herself onto you. “Hun! Oh, thank God! Oh, I thought I lost you.” She sits down beside your legs. Her arms hover in front of you for a few seconds, unsure of how to embrace you without bringing any physical discomfort. Eventually, she just decides to gently place her hands on your shoulders and plant her lips on yours. “Hah…sorry to disappoint. How long have I been out?” Meredith gives you a stern look at your sarcastic remark before warming back up again and responding. “Three days, honey.” “So it’s the 12th?” She nods. “How’s everyone else? Did anyone get hurt?” “It’s all okay now, baby. Look, just…get some rest, okay? Wells can keep this country together for a few days, so don’t worry.” That’s right. Ashton Wells has definitely been serving as acting president while you’ve been incapacitated. “What abou-” “Shush. No questions. When you’re back on your feet, we can go back to being President and First Lady. Just relax for now, okay?” You sigh. You can’t say no to her. Not in your current state, anyways. “Fine…could you get me some water?” (1/2)
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
~ MARCH 15 2012 ~ You’ve been able to get out of bed and walk with assistance since the 13th. Just as Meredith promised, you’d be filled in once you could make it to the toilet and back unassisted. How it went was more or less like this: Someone had successfully snuck a handgun into the rally and shuffled his way into the front row. Once the crowd was paying the most attention to you, he pulled the gun out and shot five rounds in your direction, one of which struck you an inch away from your heart. The rest only managed to lodge into the stage at various points and injure a security guard’s knee. He was promptly shot down when he turned to fire at the secret service moments after you collapsed onto the floor. But who was he? Archie Pearce, 23. According to records he was a philosophy major at the University of Maine between 2007 and 2011, but disappeared shortly after his graduation. Coincidentally, he was also the last of the Capitol bombers that were on the loose. Upper-middle class family, girlfriend, healthy. No history of criminal activity, save for one case of drunk driving on campus. On the surface, there seemed to be no reason for him to become a domestic terrorist…but the same could be said for most of them, couldn’t it? Unlike his friend in Congress, evidence suggests that Archie wasn’t blackmailed or forced by other means into doing what he did. Rather, he was a genuine believer in the MFSA’s Islamic extremism. You even had time to read his manifesto some over the past few days. But what about now? Now, you’re recovering much quicker then anticipated in a hospital in Chicago and are expected to be discharged sometime this week. ~ MARCH 17 2012 ~ After your flavorless breakfast, you are finally able to be discharged. You and Meredith are quickly escorted into Air Force One, this time with a post-attempt surge in security. You still need to walk with a cane for a month or two thanks to some of the damage from the bullet while it heals, but it doesn’t have any major effect on your ability to serve as president once again. With your VP waiting for you on the plane, Ashton Wells formally relinquishes his title as acting president and you are once again the leader of the free world. “Welcome back, Mr. President.” “Glad to be back.” “So…back to Washington, then?” You pause. Nobody would blame you for skipping your last stop on the campaign tour, and you know that nobody even expects you to do so. You were an inch away from dying and giving the United States its third president in two months. Not to mention that with all the time you’ve been lying in a hospital bed, you have a lot to catch up on. >Let’s just get back to DC. I have work to do, and I’m sure the campaign’s doing just fine without be while I get back into the rhythm of things. >No. Fly us to Milwaukee and tell the campaign to prep for the rally. This is just the optics I and the country could need right now. >Write-in.
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
Quoted By:
>>6219520 >The last terrorist as we didn't pull a United Health on the public. Anon saw through me like a hole in the wall.
Anonymous
>>6220523 >No. Fly us to Milwaukee and tell the campaign to prep for the rally. This is just the optics I and the country could need right now. Can't kill the Lorax.
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:qBPfFoYW Sun 30 Mar 2025 19:28:35 No. 6220625 Report Quoted By:
>>6220538 Support.
+ we should look at our ratings and post a YouTube video of us delivering a message.
More or less
‘’My fellow Americans, The Redwood is still standing. I will not be scared by a cowered with a pea shooter, nor by some cowards who hide behind civilians as they target even more civilians. They have taken their best shot- and it’s not enough.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6220523 >No. Fly us to Milwaukee and tell the campaign to prep for the rally. This is just the optics I and the country could need right now. Demonstrate to everyone that some two-bit assassin can't keep us, the Leader of the Free World, down. We're going to come out of this one swinging and stronger than ever.
Anonymous
>>6220523 >No. Fly us to Milwaukee and tell the campaign to prep for the rally. This is just the optics I and the country could need right now. 100% don’t use the can in public though - we need to be like the bull moose, strong and steady!
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6220688 One could argue that the can might help - showing his condition is so severe he needs a cane yet he still does anyway.
Also, we should totally use the part where a bullet stopped one inch away from our heart.
Anonymous
>>6220688 I'd rather not go against doctor's orders and risk aggravating our injuries and visibly struggling to walk on stage without it would be really poor optics. Besides, canes are cool and we can jab it at the air on the podium.
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:VbYjRz1a Mon 31 Mar 2025 01:58:36 No. 6220839 Report >>6220717 We could get ourselves a cane gun.
Anonymous
>>6220839 We should wear a pin over where the bullet hit. Or a tie with a mark where it did. Something understated but clear. The message, "I lived, bitch.".
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6220523 >>No. Fly us to Milwaukee and tell the campaign to prep for the rally. This is just the optics I and the country could need right now. >>6220839 +1
>>6220919 A middle finger pin over our heart
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:qBPfFoYW Mon 31 Mar 2025 13:41:09 No. 6221061 Report Quoted By:
>>6220919 Maybe we should sell T-shirts that says ‘’I Lived twice’’ on them?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>No. Fly us to Milwaukee and tell the campaign to prep for the rally. This is just the optics I and the country could need right now. Nations needs us to show true strength, that we will serve America no matter what comes at us.
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
Quoted By:
Looks like you’re going to Milwaukee. Locking in.
Anonymous
>>6220919 It should be a target circle pin over where the bullet hit (on our jacket)
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:PKy+z0PC Mon 31 Mar 2025 22:14:27 No. 6221190 Report Quoted By:
>>6221178 This.
Or have it over the hart with a hole that represents were it actually hits
Next time someone threaten us or america we simply point at it and says ‘’you better hope you got better aim’’
All of this make us seem like someone who seen to many action movies
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
Quoted By:
“No. Take us to Milwaukee, pilot.” The people that are within earshot of you double back as you surprise them with the order. “B-But sir, the tour’s been cancelle-” “I don’t care. We’re uncancelling it. Fly us to Milwaukee.” The pilot and co-pilot look at each other, bewildered. But who are they to disobey the president of the United States? “Y-Yes, sir.” Moments later, the plane is taking off and you’re on the phone with your campaign team. Once again, you’re met with surprised stutters. “Mr. President, you just got…” “…and I’m fine now. I want them to- They need to see that their president’s still healthy and willing to fight. Get it done ASAP.” Now everyone’s in a frenzy, either trying to convince you to head back home in Washington or attempting to reassemble a rally in Milwaukee. Few of them are confident in your decision, but none of that matters. You know what you’re doing, and by God it’s the right choice. ~ MARCH 19 2012 ~ Once you landed at the airport two days ago, there was no going back. Everyone just had to go along with your plan and hope you knew what you were doing. But now, after two days of moving between Air Force One and one hotel room after another and waiting for preparations to be completed, your campaign staff finally contacts you to inform that everything is complete. 10:00AM CDT tomorrow. ~ MARCH 20 2012 ~ You stand to the side of the stage, behind a curtain that no camera is pointed at. Sweat drips down your forehead. Your face feels hot. You were already expecting this to be your most popular stop on the tour with all things considered, but when you heard that roughly 200,000 people were in physical attendance (never mind viewing through TV or online) you nearly passed out. Now, with your wife wrapping her hands around your free arm, she reminds you. “It’s gonna be okay, honey. There’s nothing you can do to ruin this.” “I know, dear. I know…” As the mayor of Milwaukee ends his introduction of you, you take a deep breath before walking out onto the stage. The clapping, the cheering, it’s immediate and does not fail to slam into you like a truck. The reception is deafening to the point that you can’t even hear yourself think, and you’re simply forced to stand by the podium and be bombarded with the crowd’s applause. “Thank y-” “You guys so mu-” One minute passes. Two minutes. Three. Twelve entire minutes pass where you are applauded by the crowd of hundreds of thousands, and you’re not allowed a single word in. The only thing you’re able to do is soak it all in with the occasional smile and wave. These people…they’re here for you. They’re applauding you. They’re cheering for you. This is your moment. Finally, after what feels like forever, the crowd begins to die down enough for you to speak over them with the microphone. “Thank…thank you, thank you guys so much. Thank you…” (1/2)
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
Quoted By:
You talk about how grateful you are to be alive right now. You talk about Archie Pearce and the corrosiveness of extremism. You talk about how anybody could have ended up in his situation and that it is everyone’s responsibility to look out for each other. You talk about morality. About the MFSA, Rajab al-Hai, and the brave, young men and women that are being shipped overseas to bring them down. Eventually, the words coming out of your mouth mix together into an indecipherable stew of verbiage, but the vast crowd before you seems to cling onto every vowel nonetheless. You intended on this being a short, thirty minute rally but before you know it, you’re going off script a few times. It’s painfully obvious when you, but you don’t care. That kid was an inch away from killing you too, but by the grace of God you’re still standing and you will make the most of that. By the time you wear yourself out, you’ve been speaking on the podium for an hour. Once you wrap your speech up and give another heartfelt thanks to everyone for attending, you’re met with the thunderous and resounding applause of your ever-growing base of supporters yet again. Another half hour of shaking hands and smiling for pictures later, you’re finally able to collapse into the seat of your car as the secret service wastes no time in transporting you back to Washington. “Huff…fuck, that was a lot. Did I do good, honey?” You look up towards your wife, your head nestled atop of her lap. Her fingers are stroking your greying hair as she returns the look with a warm smile. “Yes, dear…yes, I think you did very well.” (2/2)
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
No vote today. Also, unfortunately, no pins yet since there was little time. Rest assured they will be made.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Well, we've definitely secured the election with this, so that's pretty nice.
Anonymous
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:u3JXGnIy Wed 02 Apr 2025 17:39:23 No. 6221703 Report Quoted By:
This was a very good call. I think we’re winning this election.
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
~ MARCH 24 2012 ~ It’s been a week since your rally in Milwaukee, which has since gone viral on every form of media that you know of. TV, radio, newspapers, social media, and surely others. There are some who are concerned (or simply pretending to be for partisan’s sake) that the shooting would affected your ability as President, but the average American doesn’t seem to think this event has done anything except for boosting your image as a survivor and a fighter. Your approval ratings received a spike post-shooting, but more importantly, so did your election polling. There’s still a few months left until the Democrats and Republicans (plus the third parties) begin holding their conventions, but by this point there are some clear frontrunners among them. Your campaign has already begun to workshop strategies for these likely opponents in the general election, but you won’t have to choose what approach to take for a little while longer. Until then, you have a major choice to make. You have plenty of time to make this choice, but it doesn’t hurt to begin looking for prime candidates sooner rather then later. That decision is, of course, for who will be your running mate. Your current Vice President has already made it crystal clear from the beginning that he’ll serve to the best of his ability until January 20th, but no longer then that. He’s even denied to assist with any of the campaign efforts, too. You could badger him to stay for another four years or you could look for someone else to have alongside you in your administration. >I need a steady hand. Ashton Wells has proven that he can keep the country afloat in my absence. Not only that, but he’s still one of the most experienced in the workings of Congress. I’ll see if I can get him to serve another four years. I can’t afford to change horses in the middle of the stream. >The Democrats came out for Barrett Larson in droves back in 2008, so I need to make sure they come back out for his successor. To do that, I need a young, forward thinking liberal like him on my ticket. Quiana Melia has been Governor of Hawaii since 2010, and she has quickly become a progressive icon among the youth. >This is a time of war, and that probably means the Republicans will be key to this election. I need one of them on my side. Someone conservative, yet pragmatic. Cherlynn Hubbard served as Secretary of State in the Bush administration in his second term, so she’s got the experience and is respected among the moderate conservatives. >This is the 21st century. Outsiders win elections. Since I can’t be considered much of an outsider now, I need the second best thing. An outsider running mate. Louie Nash is the CEO of Nash Tech and has been a very vocal supporter of my campaign. Why not bring him along? It would spice things up, certainly. >Write-in.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
I don't think we should try to cajole Wells: that would just cause unnecessary friction. Let the guy enjoy his retirement (until he's called up again to VP our designated survivor.) We probably want someone good with politics to shore up our flaws, but that puts us in a tricky pickle with not wanting someone overly partisan.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6222364 >>This is the 21st century. Outsiders win elections. Since I can’t be considered much of an outsider now, I need the second best thing. An outsider running mate. Louie Nash is the CEO of Nash Tech and has been a very vocal supporter of my campaign. Why not bring him along? It would spice things up, certainly. TheSurvivalist !!csQ9t6SvjpV
TheSurvivalist !!csQ9t6SvjpV ID:frNHsvx3 Thu 03 Apr 2025 18:44:59 No. 6222406 Report >>6222364 Glad I finally caught up.
Is there any choice with a military background? Will help to appeal to conservative voters, make it clear we’re focused on national defense and stability, reassert our seriousness in defeating the Islamic radicals in the Middle East, and bring a sense of discipline and professionalism to the office.
Anonymous
>>6222364 >>I need a steady hand. Ashton Wells has proven that he can keep the country afloat in my absence. Not only that, but he’s still one of the most experienced in the workings of Congress. I’ll see if I can get him to serve another four years. I can’t afford to change horses in the middle of the stream. Yeah I don't one of the two old parties and a totally !not Elon Musk.
Anonymous
>>6222406 You can write that in and someone with those qualifications will be found if it wins.
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6222364 >I have popularity, I need someone who I can trust to help run this country. Who's the most qualified member of my cabinet/staff? (write in)
TheSurvivalist !!csQ9t6SvjpV
TheSurvivalist !!csQ9t6SvjpV ID:frNHsvx3 Thu 03 Apr 2025 19:15:42 No. 6222431 Report >>6222411 How rich is the CEO? Like rich enough to help fund the campaign? Or just rich enough to be hated by the average joe?
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
Quoted By:
>>6222431 The Fortune 500 estimates Louie Nash’s net worth to be somewhere in the realm of $7 billion.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6222407 Yeah, but Ashton wants to retire. Trying to get a guy who doesn't want the job is just not a good idea.
I definitely don't want the corporate CEO, though.
TheSurvivalist !!csQ9t6SvjpV
TheSurvivalist !!csQ9t6SvjpV ID:frNHsvx3 Thu 03 Apr 2025 20:52:43 No. 6222477 Report >Write In Look for a moderate with a military background. Doesn’t have to be active or even recently retired, but someone who either commanded a large number of troops in a war zone or is a decorated vet with other experience.
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:6ahFW4z3 Thu 03 Apr 2025 21:20:31 No. 6222494 Report Quoted By:
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6222364 >>6222407 Changing vote to
>>6222477 Let's have our own General Mattis.
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
Quoted By:
Moderate with a military background it is. Locking in.
Anonymous
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
Quoted By:
You ultimately decide that, since you’re a wartime president, it would help your image to appoint someone experienced in war as your running mate. You think through your mental list of living generals that are generally noncontroversial among the broader American public, but still has name recognition. One name comes to mind again and again. You pick up the phone with your assistant on the line. “Could you get Richard Everett on the line for me? Thank you.” Richard “Hammerhead” Everett. If anyone has experience in combat, it’s him. After graduating from the Virginia Military Institute in 1972, he fought in the last years of the Vietnam War. He was made a general in 1990 around the same time that the Gulf War was kicking off, and he proceeded to serve in that capacity until his retirement in 2009. 37 years of dedicated military service and a mostly clean record to boot, he’s a safe and easy choice if you want a military man as your VP. Everett has managed to keep any political opinions he might have to himself, which means that the risk of alienating a swath of voters with this pick is minimal. The only things publicly known about his politics is that Richard is a registered independent and a paying member of the National Rifle Association of America. Other than that is anybody’s guess. “Mr. President?” A deep and gravelly voice is heard on the other side of the phone. “That’s me. This is General Everett?” “Yes, sir. To what do I owe the honor?” “Perhaps it would be better to discuss this in person. How soon could I get you here to the White House?” You don’t mind whether or not it’s a phone call or an in-person meeting, but frankly you need some time to prepare for him. It took convincing for Ashton Wells to get onboard, and now you’re pining for another retiree. On top of that, this one’s much more (openly) apolitical. You need to prepare on how to convince this man to be your second in command for at least four years. “Hmph…it sounds important. I could be there sometime tomorrow if you can fit me in, Mr. President.” You peek at your schedule. “I can. Do I need to send anybody down to Norfolk?” “No thank you.” You scribble down on a piece of paper in order to remind yourself about the general’s arrival tomorrow. “Well, that’s all I have to ask from you today. Take care, General.” “You as well, Mr. President.” (1/3)
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
Quoted By:
~ MARCH 26 2012 ~ Yesterday, you and General Everett sat down on the sofas of the Oval Office. For three continuous hours, you and him went back and forth as if you were playing tennis. As expected, the man wasn’t very keen on the idea of coming out of retirement for four years, especially for a civilian role in government. But luckily, you and a few of your staff worked together to prepare for whatever hesitations he might’ve had. You appealed to his sense of duty. You assured him that his role in the White House would be minimal. You emphasized the need of a strong, military hand by your side during the current state of the country. Eventually, the general folded and agreed to be your running mate. That was yesterday. Today, you're standing in front of a podium on the White House lawn. On one side is Ashton Wells, your current Vice President. On the other side is Richard Everett, who is about to be announced as your running mate. “Good morning. With the general election season for America’s next president fast approaching, I and my colleagues have decided that now has been a good time to discuss the future of a very important position in this cabinet. And that is the position of Vice President.” You doubt that anybody is holding their breath for this. Wells is much too old to serve as vice president for another four years, and it’s been public knowledge that he is only taking this position out of necessity. People had already been discussing who your running mate would be from the moment you announced your campaign. “After a long and thoughtful conversation earlier yesterday, and with the blessing of our current Vice President, this administration has found a suitable candidate to be my running mate. General Richard Everett.” You gesture to your side, and the small crowd claps. It’s nothing near the scale or enthusiasm of your Milwaukee rally or even the smaller, less eventful campaign stops. There’s only about fifty or so in attendance for this one, not counting the journalists and cameramen. “General Everett has served this country without any hesitation, from the jungles of Vietnam to the deserts of Iraq and Afghanistan. Now that the United States is returning to Iraq with the goal of removing a monster, it’s as important as ever for the President to have someone like him by their side. I’m honored to have the General on my ticket and I hope my supporters will have his back as you’ve had mine. Thank you.” With that, you step aside to allow Richard to take the podium and say a few words of his own. It’s only standard, almost stereotypical. “I’d like to thank Mr. President for-” That sort of thing. Then as Wells takes the podium, he too only speaks in generic, milquetoast language giving his support to the Foster-Everett ticket. It’s all procedure, but you’re fine with that. (2/3)
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
~ MARCH 27 2012 ~ You’re in the situation room. This has become a familiar part of your life at this point, choosing whether to drop a bomb or light someone’s house up with bullets. You’ve almost become numb to it already. In front of you along the table is a series of men and women in suits and military uniforms, just like per usual. However, this isn’t just a standard meeting. Right now, you’re looking up at a screen showing a bird’s eye view of what reports say is a primary school. Just eleven hours ago, drones captured Rajab al-Hai of all people entering the building along with a series of men carrying AK-47s. According to what you know, it seems the MFSA already had seized this building in a hostile takeover right before your troops started entering the Northern Borders province. Easy decision, right? Just fly in there and bomb anything that moves? That’s what you thought until you were informed that they are holding dozens of the former students and faculty hostage. None of you know the exact amount, but there’s an estimated number to the tune of 95. 95 innocent lives that may or may not be alive and God knows how many combatants stashed away in there. You can’t use bombs or gas or anything that risks harming the children, so that leaves you two reasonable options.>We’ll get in contact with them somehow. Surround the building and try to negotiate the release of the hostages. It’ll take us longer, but hopefully should be the safer option for the hostages. >We’ll send in the troops and infiltrate the school. A precise, coordinated strike. It’s the riskier option, but it’ll be quicker and they hopefully shouldn’t see it coming until we are through those doors. >Write-in. (3/3)
Anonymous
>>6223669 >We’ll get in contact with them somehow. Surround the building and try to negotiate the release of the hostages. It’ll take us longer, but hopefully should be the safer option for the hostages. Last thing we need is getting the media to spin us as a war criminal.
TheSurvivalist !!csQ9t6SvjpV
TheSurvivalist !!csQ9t6SvjpV ID:PyIjQdQt Sat 05 Apr 2025 21:49:50 No. 6223868 Report >>6223669 >>We’ll send in the troops and infiltrate the school. A precise, coordinated strike. It’s the riskier option, but it’ll be quicker and they hopefully shouldn’t see it coming until we are through those doors. I don't see the terrorists surrendering at this point lol, a quick strike and hope that they don't kill too many. I assume a SF team is going in and not the marines right?
Anonymous
>>6223669 >We’ll get in contact with them somehow. Surround the building and try to negotiate the release of the hostages. It’ll take us longer, but hopefully should be the safer option for the hostages. See if we can bring along some IGF as well so long as they don't do anything stupid, if they might be more willing to talk to some other Arab faces than us. I don't anticipate them surrendering since they should be MFSA's best and most loyal, but there's likely to be too many terrorists and too far above the usual yokel-with-a-gun standard in there to kill them all before they start shooting hostages if we storm it. It could easily turn into a bloodbath that would be disastrous PR, especially if we chose violence as a first resort. Beslan should still be fresh in the minds of counter-terrorism forces. We have no real good options here.
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
Quoted By:
>>6223868 >I assume a SF team is going in and not the marines right? You’d assume right.
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:NzW9hvIA Sat 05 Apr 2025 22:45:28 No. 6223901 Report Quoted By:
We could ask them if they are willing to release prisoners for hostages (and maybe trap the released terrorists with trackers designed to blow up if removed)
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6223669 >We’ll get in contact with them somehow. Surround the building and try to negotiate the release of the hostages. It’ll take us longer, but hopefully should be the safer option for the hostages. Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6223674 >We’ll send in the troops and infiltrate the school. A precise, coordinated strike. It’s the riskier option, but it’ll be quicker and they hopefully shouldn’t see it coming until we are through those doors. Ok think for a second here guys these are Islamic terrorists and the leader of the that literally orchestrated the worst damn attack on U.S soil since 9/11 what the actual flying fuck could they we possibly negotiate with them outside a immediate and unconditional surrender that wouldn't end in our heads on a metaphorical platter?
Sure the optics of kids dying isn't great but the optics of "president literally negotiates with terrorists/super bin laden" is even worse.
Anonymous
>We’ll send in the troops and infiltrate the school. A precise, coordinated strike. It’s the riskier option, but it’ll be quicker and they hopefully shouldn’t see it coming until we are through those doors. Ok think for a second here guys these are Islamic terrorists and the leader of these terrorists literally orchestrated the worst damn attack on U.S soil since 9/11 what the actual flying fuck could we possibly negotiate with them outside a immediate and unconditional surrender that wouldn't end in our heads on a metaphorical platter? Sure the optics of kids dying isn't great but the optics of "president literally negotiates with terrorists/super bin laden" is even worse. Plus you know damn well they are going to pull that "give in to our demands or we execute a hostage every 10 minutes!" crap.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6223894 Also do keep in mind Rajab al-Hai the guy that started all this is also inside that building.
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:QEq2Qv54 Sun 06 Apr 2025 00:21:42 No. 6223949 Report Quoted By:
>>6223947 Honestly I change my vote to this.
At most we should ‘’negotiate’’ as far as us personally calling these terrorists the cowards they are or using it as a distraction to open up a can of GI issued wopass
Anonymous
>>6223947 I was intending to basically siege them to stall until we get a better picture of what's going in here, figure out what the fuck to do and find a better opportunity to get SOF instead of charging through the doors in rather than hoping for them to genuinely want to negotiate (lolno they won't)
Anonymous
>>6223952 The thing is anon right now we have the initiative since they are unaware of us already spotting them which means its still possible to catch them off guard. If we stall and give them time to prepare we go from "there's a high chance of some kids dying" to "it's guaranteed some kids are gonna die."
Better to rip the band aid and charge in before they have a chance to know what the hell is going on.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6223669 >>We’ll send in the troops and infiltrate the school. A precise, coordinated strike. It’s the riskier option, but it’ll be quicker and they hopefully shouldn’t see it coming until we are through those doors. If there weren't kids but just grown civilians in there I'd vote to bomb it and media blackout it that it was only terrorists inside. Alas, there are children. Good thing our speccy bois are the best in the world. Get some of the ones with experience doing compound raids and embassy rescues on the line. Violence should be swift and absolute in order to be effective.
Anonymous
>>6223955 I find it hard to believe they don't know what they're doing. They know that a ton of bricks is in the process of coming down on them and the leader of a major terrorist group does not randomly turn up at one of their raids, especially when they know we have eyes on them (see how paranoid and reclusive OBL got after 9/11). The timing of just as operations start is very suspicious and I don't believe for a second they don't expect us. What I don't know is what they're playing at or what they expect us to do.
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:U/2sq3cB Sun 06 Apr 2025 00:48:00 No. 6223972 Report >>6223963 I bet you he have a body double in there
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6223963 >What I don't know is what they're playing at or what they expect us to do. Ain't it obvious? The goal is to make it so no matter what we do we look bad. Politically/Religiously motivated terrorists especially islamic terrorists absolutely love doing this shite.
Also I didn't mean they didn't expect us to notice them I'm just betting on the idea they didn't expect us *right now* it's like expecting a train in a hour and it barrels down at you in only a minute. Doesn't really matter you were expecting a train your plan still revolved around it coming in a feken hour.
>>6223972 If it's a body double I'm going to seethe.
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
It’s a close one, but it appears that a swift strike on the school has it. Locking in. Roll 1d100. Best of 3.
Anonymous
>>6224352 Le ebin critfail
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Rolled 34 (1d100) >>6224354 Forgot to ROLL
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Rolled 78 (1d100) >>6224352 Them kids?
Dead.
TheSurvivalist !!csQ9t6SvjpV
TheSurvivalist !!csQ9t6SvjpV ID:NAs/QO5Q Sun 06 Apr 2025 17:40:57 No. 6224365 Report TheSurvivalist !!csQ9t6SvjpV
TheSurvivalist !!csQ9t6SvjpV ID:NAs/QO5Q Sun 06 Apr 2025 17:42:25 No. 6224367 Report Quoted By:
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:Z3494lTO Sun 06 Apr 2025 18:12:21 No. 6224392 Report Quoted By:
Rolled 64 (1d100) >>6224352 FOR AMERICA!
Anonymous
Rolled 98 (1d100) >>6224352 >>6224354 You asked for a critfail. I shall deliver.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6224448 Damn, you were the fourth roll.
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:qBPfFoYW Sun 06 Apr 2025 21:14:48 No. 6224509 Report >>6224448 The special forces went full Action Movie.
Do you think we will take the BBEG alive?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6224509 That came after the 3rd roll I'm afraid, we'll have to make do with a 78. Still breddy gud.
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
Quoted By:
It’s 7:57PM. In Saudi Arabia, specifically where the terrorist-controlled school is located, it is 2:57AM. In three minutes, 150 special forces will surround the area and begin to infiltrate the school, shooting down anyone that’s an armed combatant and liberating those that aren’t. Best case scenario, no innocent lives will be taken and the head of the snake that is the MFSA will be cut off. You don’t even want to think about the worst case scenario. It’s two minute until the operation begins. You’ve spent the past hours on this. Mobilizing the special forces. Attempting to map out the school. Attempting to get a headcount of everyone inside, friend and foe. For the past consecutive hours, your mind has been focused on one task. And now that task is about to start. One minute left. Your drones see the lights of the approaching company through their night vision. Whispered commands tickle your comms as they enter their positions, just as planned. 5…4…3…2…1… “Let’s go.” As the captain gives the orders on the very first second of the hour, two dozen men each approach the front and back entrances while half a dozen each approach the multiple wide entrances scattered around the building. The first few guards around the perimeter go down quickly, whether it’s a silenced pistol to the temple or a knife in the back. So far so good. They’re still unseen as they line up on the walls. The element of surprise is maintained. … Then you hear it. It’s muted and distorted through the comma, but you still hear the unmistakable pop of a bullet. One shot is quickly followed by a loud, chaotic barrage of them and male voices, not your guys, yelling in alarm after being caught off guard. You recline into your chair, fidgeting with a pencil while your eyes are glued to the screen in front of you. After five or so of the first terrorists are eliminated while trying to grab their weapons, you hear the first on your side yell in pain before collapsing. It’s quick and it’s sudden, but your men are able to push their way into the building and at least secure the entrances. The next five minutes are spent in stalemate. Both sides fire their guns and fill the hallways with lead and copper, occasionally hitting one of their enemies. But that ends once the rest of the company surrounding the walls begin to break the glass and catch a good load of the enemy militants off guard, filling their backs with bullets as well and climbing through. “We found hostages! Seven!” “No hostages here! Two dead!” (1/2)
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
Before the enemy fighters realize it, they’re being overwhelmed and pushed into the center from all sides. Rooms are cleared. Hallways are secured. The enemy realizes they are surrounded, which only makes them more desperate to break through. However, it’s too late for them. In no more than a quarter of an hour, the school is cleared of MFSA presence. You check your watch. 8:14PM. “How many hostages are still alive?” “We don’t know yet, sir.” “What about al-Hai? Did the bastard die?” “We don’t know that yet either, sir.” You flick the pencil onto the table and stand up, pushing your chair behind you a little too forcefully before pacing around the back of the room. 95 hostages to account for and each one dead is another mainstream news anchor lambasting you for it and during an election season, too. This will be a highlight of the war—the first highlight—and you cannot afford for it to be a failure. Roughly half an hour later, the school is fully cleared out and you have the tally. The MFSA was holding 95 prisoners total in the building, just as your information suggested. Unfortunately, only 78 of those prisoners are still alive. 17 were caught in the crossfire, surely having taken shots from both sides intentionally or not. None of the special forces found al-Hai’s corpse among the many, nor did they find anyone who looked like him. “What the fuck?!” “I’m sorry, sir.” “How the fuck did he get away?!” “We don’t know, sir. If we had to guess-” “I don’t want guesses, General!” “…we believe that al-Hai must’ve been driven out sometime when our drone footage was offline.” You release a deep groan while rubbing your forehead. “Of course he did…fuck, what a mess. Did we take any prisoners?” “No, sir. We didn’t get the chance to.” “And how many of our own are…?” “51, sir. 34 wounded.” You sigh, gesturing behind you as you walk out of the situation room. “I’ll put out a statement tomorrow. You guys deal with the hostages.” “Yes, sir.” You’re exhausted. You stumble through the White House until you collapse onto your bed beside Meredith. ~ MARCH 28 2012 ~ You are standing beside a few of the generals assigned to this conflict as one of them speaks in front of a podium. The flashing, white lights of cameras are nearly blinding you as they always do. Reporters fill the room in front of you. The first thing you did at the break of dawn was work on just how exactly you planned to break the news to the public. >Be honest. Tell them about failing to catch Rajab al-Hai. Tell them about the rescued hostages and who weren’t so lucky. Tell them about the dead militants and the dead Americans. >Lie. I’ll tell them that we were wrong about al-Hai being there, period. We can’t lie about the American casualties, but we can drum up the number of MFSA ones. Maybe even get away with playing down the dead hostages. >Write-in. (2/2)
Raven !rW.jOLvarU
>>6224892 >Be honest. Tell them about failing to catch Rajab al-Hai. Tell them about the rescued hostages and who weren’t so lucky. Tell them about the dead militants and the dead Americans. Yeah of course the fuckhead in charge isn't dead, leaders of bands like these are like rats. Christ 51 casualties, 17 dead kids among them and 17 americans as well? Not too sure about that bit. Yeah we ain't lying our way out of this, forget the ethics something will eventually leak and that will sink us. All we can do is come clean.
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:G/YQgbXG Mon 07 Apr 2025 18:00:40 No. 6224908 Report Quoted By:
Anonymous
This was the result of a 78?
TheSurvivalist !!csQ9t6SvjpV
TheSurvivalist !!csQ9t6SvjpV ID:AgmKp65d Mon 07 Apr 2025 18:11:24 No. 6224916 Report Quoted By:
>>6224903 Yeah I would go on the offensive here. This is a war we are waging on people who would take innocents as hostage and kill them without a second thought. It’s unfortunate but there will be causalities, such as there always are fighting evil.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6224903 Yeah, definitely don't lie - it's just obvious that'll come to bite us in the ass later.
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
Quoted By:
>>6224910 Indeed it was. Anything over 95 would’ve counted as no hostages dead and some enemy captives. 100 would’ve meant capturing al-Hai.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6224892 >Be honest. Tell them about failing to catch Rajab al-Hai. Tell them about the rescued hostages and who weren’t so lucky. Tell them about the dead militants and the dead Americans. Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6224892 >>Be honest. Tell them about failing to catch Rajab al-Hai. Tell them about the rescued hostages and who weren’t so lucky. Tell them about the dead militants and the dead Americans. AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
Quoted By:
Honesty is the best policy. Locking in.
Anonymous
>>6224892 >“…we believe that al-Hai must’ve been driven out sometime when our drone footage was offline.” This guy has IRL plot armor that would make Fidel Castro envious.
Coping aside out of pure curiosity if we took the other option with the roll we got would things of gone better or were we going to take a hit from that no matter what?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Whoever was in charge of the drones? Fire that fucking guy. Could have had a second drone up BEFORE they had to pull one down for rotation. Jesus.
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
>>6225574 >Coping aside out of pure curiosity if we took the other option with the roll we got would things of gone better or were we going to take a hit from that no matter what? You have no way of knowing. The only thing you can do is make assumptions, but considering how quick the MFSA were to start eliminating hostages, you can only guess that there would’ve been casualties either way. Whether more or less than what actually occurred is anybody’s guess.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6225637 Well atleast my assessment that casualties would of been practically guaranteed if we waited was correct although still can't believe he feken escaped.
God I hate islamic terrorism and their "we sacrifice our lives to make you look bad". bullshite.
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
Quoted By:
Once the general that is currently up and on the podium finishes speaking, it’s your turn to take his place. The men in military uniforms had the job of breaking this news to the public. This could’ve been done without you, but it would be seen as insensitive for the president not to appear in addressing 51 American being killed in action abroad. Regardless of what you say, the American public now knows exactly what had occurred last night. “My fellow Americans…as you’ve just heard, a special forces unit has just executed an operation last night inside of a primary school which was seized by the MFSA. What you’ve also heard is that this was a very delicate mission due to the high number of hostages present.” You glance back at the people standing to your left before resuming. “I intend on personally calling the families of the brave soldiers that were killed in combat during last night’s mission and I hope that you all will respect their privacy during this time. As for the hostages that we had managed to rescue, they are in the process of being returned to their family somewhere safe in Saudi custody. May we all pray for those we’ve lost in this incident and the recovery of those that are injured.” You bow your head for a moment. The rooms joins suit. You’re all only in that position for a few seconds before you raise your head again and continue. “Some might feel demoralized at this failure to capture Rajab al-Hai. I choose to see this differently. We have only been fighting this war for less then two months and yet we were just moments away from capturing the head of this despicable organization. Less then two months…at the rate that we are pushing them back, America might just see al-Hai and all of his colleagues brought to the fullest extent of justice before the new year.” You’re not confident in this at all. You don’t even know for sure if the man your drones spotted was even him. For all you know, it could’ve been a body double. Either way, the president needs to remain optimistic towards the people that look up to him. That’s basically part of the job. “I trust the fine people running our military to bring a swift victory to this conflict and I trust that, no matter how brutal an attack or how intimidating a threat we face, the United States will persevere. Thank you.” You depart the stage to the side, disappearing around the back as the crowd of reporters clamber to get a comment out of you, but to no avail. (1/2)
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
~ APRIL 2 2012 ~ Two days ago, you attended the state funeral for the 51 soldiers who died in that broken down, Saudi school. Speaking of broken down, despite your best efforts, your approval rating has seen a noticeable dip ever since that incident. It’s still in the positives, but not by as much as you’re accustomed to. You’re now at peacetime president levels. Whatever progress you made in pulling yourself ahead of the competition had been completely erased, and now you’re polling even with the two main parties and their frontrunners. In some polls, you’re even falling behind by a point or two. Some of your staff are confident that this is a temporary drop and will rise again on its own once people forget about the incident and that anything too desperate will only make it worse, but others are telling you to take more action on the campaign trail to bring more voters to your camp to prevent your numbers from permanently remaining low. One of your campaign staff makes an interesting suggestion. Instead of campaigning like normal, he suggests getting in contact with some people at the FBI who can access some more private information regarding your opponents. From there, you can do a variety of things. Leaking it to the press. Blackmail. If it’s anything severe, reporting it to the proper authorities. You do indeed think that this is something you are capable of doing, but is it worth it? This is both legally and morally questionable, nevermind risky. If it gets out, you can kiss your second term goodbye. Hell, you might even get impeached before you get the chance to be voted out. But if it works and there’s dirt underneath your opponent’s fingernails (which is a certainty with politicians), then they’re could experience a dramatic fall in the polls, leaving you with the opportunity to pick up whatever voters they hemorrhage. >I’m going to call up the FBI and see if I can dig up anything on my main opponent. This is politics, so I need to play dirty. (Democrat? Republican? Both?) >I can’t do that. I won’t do that. I won’t sacrifice my integrity for votes, even if it might cost me the election. >Write-in. (2/2)
Anonymous
Quoted By:
It's time for loraxgate, bros.
Anonymous
>>6225999 >I can’t do that. I won’t do that. I won’t sacrifice my integrity for votes, even if it might cost me the election. Lets not go breaking bad here we still have a good shot of winning and doing this now goes against all the everyday white bread boring american values our man stands for!
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:CIdQZQef Wed 09 Apr 2025 20:54:46 No. 6226066 Report >>6225999 Are any of the opponents known as being sketchy?
TheSurvivalist !!csQ9t6SvjpV
TheSurvivalist !!csQ9t6SvjpV ID:5sd4ltDh Wed 09 Apr 2025 22:10:04 No. 6226104 Report Quoted By:
>>6226015 This. Definitely not opposed to later on if we start slipping but I don’t think we’re behind enough to gamble it all
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
Quoted By:
>>6226066 As far as politicians go, they’re about as known for being sketchy as anyone else. The Democrats are trying to convince voters that the Republican frontrunner is an out of touch elitist who can’t even correctly guess the price of a banana. The Republicans are trying to convince voters that the Democratic frontrunner is a scheming, devilish Washington insider who only cares about serving themselves. Naturally, most of these attempts to smear their images are done by the other side for partisan gain, but that doesn’t necessarily mean they are or are not true.
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:Rg6m0hxp Wed 09 Apr 2025 22:38:23 No. 6226111 Report Quoted By:
>>6226015 Support.
If we start slipping then I think we should… encourage, the FBI and IRS to look into them and their immediate families for (legit) illegal activities but that is as far I am willing to go to compromise.
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
Quoted By:
Looks like you’re gonna play it straight for now. Locking in.
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
Quoted By:
You’re quick to deny the staffer his proposition. If the time comes where you have no choice but to play dirty to win, it is of your opinion that that time is not now. Not only is it morally and legally questionable at best and utterly deplorable at worst, but you’re far from out of options and it’s not like your access to that one won’t be going away anytime soon before the election. For now you plan on running a straight and honest election regardless of whether your opponents (or even your own campaign team) takes a colorful approach or not. ~ APRIL 4 2012 ~ You’re in the middle of doing paperwork when a staffer of your campaign sends you an email. Just in time too, because not even ten minutes ago you were in the situation room handling Operation Judgement Day. After skimming through the message, you grab your phone and dial the staffer. Ring, ring. Ring, ring. Ring, ri- “H-Hello? Mr. President?” “That’s me. What’s this you’re showing me here?” “Oh, you mean the email? Right, that’s uh…well, how do I put this? You know about Fox News, right?” “Of course I know about Fox News.” Needless to say, you’ve never been impressed. “Well, the campaign was reached out to by one of their heads…they want to interview you. One on one.” “What’s the catch?” “If there is one, they didn’t bother to tell us.” “I see…” “So what is it, sir? Should we accept?” “Give me a minute to think it over and I’ll let you know, alright? Thank you.” You hang up. Fox News has tried to keep their criticism of you to a minimum after your initial swearing in, what with you being nigh unanimously approved of at the start of your tenure and all. But now that the primary seasons are beginning to wrap up and your approval ratings have dove into the low fifties, they’ve begun resuming their petty attacks on you just as they did for your predecessor, all of which was only intensified with the “Saudi School Culling” as one of their guests put it. Whatever it is they’re hoping to get out of this interview, it surely isn’t good for you. With that said, this could also provide an ample opportunity for you as well. It would show that you’re not scared to jump into a lion’s cage to spread your message. Some of the viewers who might not have registered you as an option before might just reconsider if you do well enough. At the very least, you could end up exciting your base by “owning” Fox News with “facts and logic.” (1/2)
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
It’s a high risk, high reward situation. But is it one worth entering in the first place?>Yes. I’m going to prepare the best I can for the Fox interview. It’s good to give myself more challenges in the campaign before the general season begins, considering my main opponents will have already been fighting tooth and nail for a year at this point to get this far. >No. Whatever trap those partisan hacks plan on setting for me, I won’t step into it. I could plan an interview with a friendlier network or organize a Q&A myself with the campaign’s help, and it’d surely be more productive than whatever comes of this offer. (2/2)
Raven !rW.jOLvarU
Quoted By:
>>6227321 >Yes. I’m going to prepare the best I can for the Fox interview. It’s good to give myself more challenges in the campaign before the general season begins, considering my main opponents will have already been fighting tooth and nail for a year at this point to get this far. Fox has a stranglehold on a large segment of the American populace, they will never hear the truth of our message unless we go on.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6227321 >Yes. I’m going to prepare the best I can for the Fox interview. It’s good to give myself more challenges in the campaign before the general season begins, considering my main opponents will have already been fighting tooth and nail for a year at this point to get this far. If we want to take voters from both sides going onto Fox News is practically a must. We should not go in with the mindset of owning them or exciting our base but rather bringing ourselves more into the spotlight and converting over some republicans who may be on the fence about things.
Any traps they play (and they WILL play them) call them out for what they are before moving on to the next question and don't let them bully us with words to not give us a chance to speak our case this interview revolves around us and we should treat it as such.
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:wbN/OsIF Fri 11 Apr 2025 22:36:33 No. 6227471 Report >>6227321 Yes
(Write in) on one condition, we will have the original copy of the interview and if we feel that we been taken out of context or otherwise misrepresented on Fox News in any form- we can release the full video on our YouTube channel.
I am not having them splice things together to make us look the fool.
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6227321 >>Yes. I’m going to prepare the best I can for the Fox interview. It’s good to give myself more challenges in the campaign before the general season begins, considering my main opponents will have already been fighting tooth and nail for a year at this point to get this far. Anonymous
>>6227321 >>No. Whatever trap those partisan hacks plan on setting for me, I won’t step into it. I could plan an interview with a friendlier network or organize a Q&A myself with the campaign’s help, and it’d surely be more productive than whatever comes of this offer. We have decades of irl experience showing that "reaching out to the otherwise" via Fox News doesn't work.
TheSurvivalist !!csQ9t6SvjpV
TheSurvivalist !!csQ9t6SvjpV ID:GrvMQsA5 Sat 12 Apr 2025 16:41:44 No. 6227933 Report Quoted By:
>>6227471 I like this. Supporting. We could have our media team make a big thing out of it but I think they’re going to play it straight and just try to back us into a corner.
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
Quoted By:
Looks like you’re going on Fox. Locking in.
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
I completely forgot to ask this, but roll 1d20 best of 3. DC: 12.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Rolled 15 (1d20) >>6228202 Anonymous
Rolled 18 (1d20) >>6228202 Anonymous
Quoted By:
Rolled 10 (1d20) >>6228202 Fake news.
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:zbZActEb Sun 13 Apr 2025 02:25:16 No. 6228245 Report >>6228216 I think we’re going to do well.
Anonymous
>>6228245 >I only eat apple pie. >My favorite sport is baseball. >I can sing the national anthem - backwards. They can't handle the raw patriotism of a quiet and simple man.
Anonymous
>>6228202 Must of played light since we aren't a straight up democrat.
>>6228316 The moment we mentioned we prefer propane over charcoal we already won.
Anonymous
>>6227926 Also feel I should note that while you are correct that normally trying to appeal to normalcy is a failing strategy we did change the entire voting system to allow for ranked choice so something as simple as us convincing a large chunk of people to vote us second over say the libertarian party could go a long way.
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:A7BuEN5e Mon 14 Apr 2025 16:27:03 No. 6229085 Report Quoted By:
>>6229071 Not to mention we survived a governmental decapication, is a wartime president, and survived an assassination and kept on walking.
We are probably seen as a soft spoken badass to many Americans.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6229064 >The moment we mentioned we prefer propane over charcoal we already won. >"So you're telling me Mr. sorry, President Foster that you grill every other weekend? That you go down and pick up a bag of coals to cook up some meat on the lawn at the Whitehouse? Sounds a little hard to believe." >"Well actually John I use propane myself. It cooks cleaner and gives the meat a smoother flavor." He's the King of the Capitol Hill. It's funny though since as a sort of environmentally aware man, that could very well be a real response. Now just combine that with asking Foster what his favorites fruits are and he says "Apples, peaches, oranges and pears." and watch everyone freak out with Lorax memes because those all come from trees.
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
Quoted By:
Apologies for the wait and thank you all for your patience. This next reply is a big one and it’s taking a while to come together, but it should be out hopefully soon. Here’s a picture of your wife to make up for the waiting.
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ
DepartmentofORTH !!wS3ddMfIXTJ ID:MkyOMLjz Mon 14 Apr 2025 19:30:28 No. 6229182 Report QM, those who knew were involved in the terror attacks- did any of them have influence on who get picked as the designated survivor? I would find it hilarious if the perpetrator (I am 60% sure that the Bidladin wannabe is the main guy responsible, but I am still half expecting our special forces to stumble on some evidence of some unknown person also involved) was expecting us to be a lame president. Also- we should keep a Lorax figurine on our desk during the 2nd term.
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
Quoted By:
>>6229182 Only the president officially chooses the designated survivor so unless you find information that Barrett Larson was behind the plot of his own assassination, no. Whether or not he was influenced by anybody to pick you, you’d be hard pressed to find any evidence of that.
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
Quoted By:
You stand up from your desk and walk to your bedroom. Meredith is out for an AIDS awareness event or something similar, so the only thing that greets you in the room is silence, which is very much a welcome thing to (not) hear. You grab the TV remote off of the counter and sit on the edge of the bed while turning it on. You scroll through the cable stations. Sports, cartoons, dramas, news… “There you are.” Fox News in all of its conservative, patriotic, American glory. You sit back and watch it for a few minutes, barely even listening to the pundits talk about how unpresidential you looked during one rally or another. You don’t even know why you feel compelled to watch it while you mull over the decision to be interviewed by these people, but you do nonetheless. Eventually, you run out of reasons not to go on while the reasons to do so continue to pile up. You turn the TV off ten or twenty minutes later and return to your desk. You pick up the phone and redial the staffer. “H-Hello? Mr. President, sir?” “Yep, it’s me. Tell Fox News that I’d be delighted to make an appearance.” ~ APRIL 9 2012 ~ After five days of rigorous training by your campaign, you feel that you are as prepared as you could be for this day. Now you are sitting on an oval shaped desk on one side, facing the camera while famed political anchor Swanson McNear sits on the other (again, facing the camera). Rolling in 5, 4, 3, 2, 1… “Well, thank you for coming on tonight, Mr. Foster.” You notice him not calling you President, but choose to ignore it. “Thank you for having me.” “Let’s get right to business, shall we? I don’t think our viewers wanna be kept waiting any longer.” You nod and the two of you begin flipping through your papers. “Alright, so you’ve been president for about three and a half months. That’s not a lot of time, but there has been plenty of things that have happened during your presidency so far. What would you say has been your greatest achievement in office at this point?” At least he finally acknowledges it. It would be too obvious if he tries avoiding that word for the entire interview. You sit silently for a moment as if you are contemplating the answer, but really that is one of the first questions you were quizzed on by your aides. “Well, there really has been a lot going on, as you just said. I like to think that I have made a great deal of progress in the time that I’ve been given so far, but if I had to pick just one…I suppose it would have to be FAFDA. In one day, Congress and I have managed to do something no other group of politicians have managed to do, and that is completely rework our electoral processes to be far more democratic. And now with the Supreme Court starting to approve some of the first of these changes, I’m positive we’ll see how great this is for America this November.” (1/3)
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
“I see. So you’d consider mandatory voting to be more democratic, then? As opposed to letting it remain a choice.” Again, this is the thing that your opposition has been railing against the most regarding your electoral reform. Makes sense, since it’s what the average voter understands the quickest. “I do. Democracy only works as intended when everyone plays their part. If only half of our citizens participate in our elections, how can we honestly say that any of our elected officials have a mandate to lead? I plan on changing that and am glad that we managed to do some great work in that regard in record time.” “Right…and how exactly do you plan on enforcing this? What will happen to somebody who doesn’t wish to vote?” “We’re still working on that, I’m sorry to say. I can promise the people watching this that they won’t be facing life in prison or anything of that magnitude, however.” “Well, if it was me, I would’ve figured that out from the start, but that’s irrelevant I suppose.” McNear flips a page before continuing. “Another thing that has been a defining feature of your short presidency so far is the return to Iraq, the “Operation Judgement Day” as some call it.” This is a topic that your opponents would need to tread lightly in, considering its popularity. “Many have called your handling of the recent situation regarding a Saudi school, where 17 innocent civilians and 51 American soldiers were killed, to be a failing. Do you think there was anything you could’ve done better, now that you have hindsight?” Matter of fact, this is actually a topic you both need to be careful of. “Hm…well, naturally, the answer is gonna be yes. I’m sure anybody in that position would be thinking it over constantly and coming up with ideas on how to bring the number of casualties down. I know I did, and frankly, still do…but that’s only with hindsight. This wasn’t just the president’s decision to make. It was a joint effort with the best generals in our military, and we all agreed in that moment that this was the best way to attempt to capture Rajab al-Hai while minimizing civilian loss. Something that must be remembered is this: the MFSA has no regard towards human lives. They do not hesitate to murder innocent people if it will further their evil goals. While we were doing everything that we could to prevent any hostage from being executed, there were simply too many. I wish there was some way to prevent those needless tragedies, but the only thing I would change is not getting there soon enough.” “So you don’t think that attempting to negotiate the release of the hostages was on the table?” “The United States doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.” That stops McNear from pressing onto you further. He is quick to change the subject. “Ahem…so your campaign, you’ve been reluctant to release a platform beyond the more immediate issues this election.” (2/3)
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
“Do you plan on releasing a more coherent platform for your campaign or do you plan on just…seeing how the wind blows?” “Well first and foremost, I wouldn’t call myself “reluctant.” This campaign began extremely late compared to some others. If I recall correctly, the Republican frontrunner has been running since June of last yea-” “I get what you’re meaning, but wouldn’t the same apply to the Democratic candidates as well? Larson was the presumptive nominee all the way up until he was assassinated, so the field was filled with new candidates. And they’ve all put out official platforms in no time.” Looks like he doesn’t have any problems interrupting you. “Right, I understand that…and I do admit that the campaign hasn’t been focusing enough resources on our platform as we should. I won’t make excuses, but I will simply ask the people watching this at home to take a look at the rocky state of this country and the multitude of issues facing the White House at this time. I can promise you all, however, that the official Foster 2012 platform will be released very soon.” “How soon?” “We don’t have a set date, but sometime in the coming week is our best estimate.” That’s a lie. You haven’t even gotten started on a comprehensive platform beyond the three or so main topics of this election cycle. “We’ll keep an eye out for that, then. Moving on…” The rest of the interview proceeds smoothly. Almost every question that the man throws your way, you’ve already prepared for in advance. And of the few that you didn’t anticipate, they are easy to answer or just not something that’ll hurt you too bad if you make a blunder. With that said, you don’t make a single one. Aside from small mistakes and imperfections, you practically ace the rest of the interview. After an hour of back and forth and growing disappointment on his face, Swanson McNear brings an end to the broadcast. An hour later, you are back at the White House. Now you just need to wait and see how the people respond to this. (3/3. No update today, since I’m sure some of you are still trickling back in.)
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6229480 >“The United States doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.” >That stops McNear from pressing onto you further. He is quick to change the subject. lmao get fucked, news man.
>>6229481 >And they’ve all put out official platforms in no time.” They also didn't literally get fucking shot in the chest, too. Nor had to deal with running the country at the same time. Get this joker outta here!
TheSurvivalist !!uuJbd4m8dPS
TheSurvivalist !!uuJbd4m8dPS ID:UwDfwU4p Sat 26 Apr 2025 14:32:37 No. 6229974 Report >>6229481 Great to have you back Aspen!
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6229480 >“The United States doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.” >That stops McNear from pressing onto you further. He is quick to change the subject. Guy walked right into that one.
Anyway glad we are back and I say our guy did pretty good except for
>I can promise the people watching this that they won’t be facing life in prison or anything of that magnitude, however.” There's this concept known as priming and saying this without anyone else bringing it up first brings to the forefront the idea of people facing life in prison for not voting even if that ain't the case. It's like a teacher reassuring the class on the first day of college "don't worry I'm not a rapist." like cool and all but now the students got that idea on their mind for the rest of the semester and was that really something you had to bring up?
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
~ APRIL 11 2012 ~ It’s been two days since you went on Fox News and the public response has been confirmed…and it’s unimpressively lackluster. If it’s a giant wave of newfound support across the aisle or a thunderous roar of disapproval from your own base that you were expecting, then you are left disappointed. This doesn’t hurt your current support and your chances of a term in your own right, but it doesn’t help you gain any ground either. All in all, you wasted a lot of precious time that could’ve been spent on the campaign trail. You sigh, rubbing your temple while reclined in your office chair. You reach for the phone and dial your campaign chairman. “Hey, it’s me. Let’s get to work on that platform.” ~ APRIL 12 2012 ~ It’s an hour before noon, Eastern Standard Time. You have been called into the situation room, where another twenty or so men and women (mostly men) in suits and military uniform (mostly the latter) are gathered around to discuss the latest developments in Operation Judgement Day. This hasn’t been the first time you’ve been here and it’s far from the last. You can already basically skip through half the conversation on auto pilot at this point. “What’s this?” In front of you is a digital map of Iraq and its surrounding neighbors. It looks different from the last one you had seen. There is a lot of blue on the map now, but there is more black as well. “Sir, the good news is that we have successfully pushed the MFSA out of Saudi Arabia and have them contained within Iraq as of 12:30AM this morning.” Silence befalls the generals who look at each other with apprehension before one of them continues where his fellow officer had left off. “…the bad news is that the MFSA have made tremendous gains within Iraq while we were doing so. As you can see here,” He points to the map, somewhere in the center of Iraq. “Baghdad has capitulated to the MFSA. The Iraqi government is in disarray, and if something isn’t done we could see the vast majority of the country under their control.” You sigh a deep sigh. “I’m going to go ahead and assume that this is all incredibly bad for us.” Everyone replies with silent, affirming nods. “Well, alright then…so what are our options?” “Mr. President, I suggest we look back at inviting some of our allies into the effort. As it stands, we only have the Saudis supporting us. NATO is only one call away.” “I disagree, Mr. President. The way that I see it, this is a manpower issue. We currently only have 100,000 troops deployed in the region. If you permit us to raise that number to 200,000, we can break the current standstill on the front lines.” “Would this require a draft?” “Partially, sir.” (1/2)
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
A draft right now is a risky decision for your public approval and your chances of getting re-elected. It all depends on how much the people support the war. Inviting more world powers to the war also runs the risk of overcomplicating it beyond its necessity. It all depends on which risk you feel like taking. >It needs to be done. I’ll tell the general that he’ll get his 200k. The broad majority of the American public supports this war and we need to win it regardless of the political consequences. >The other general’s got a point. This isn’t just an attack on America. It’s an attack on the entire free world, and we need all hands on deck now that Baghdad has fallen. I’ll call up some of our allies. >Write-in. (2/2)
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
Quoted By:
>>6229974 Glad to be back.
TheSurvivalist !!uuJbd4m8dPS
TheSurvivalist !!uuJbd4m8dPS ID:G2RuDeFQ Sun 27 Apr 2025 17:41:48 No. 6230641 Report Quoted By:
There is no way in hell we’re restarting the draft lmao, that is just not possible. If it’s a manpower issue, feels like we’ll have to start activating national guard units if nothing else. I suppose we’re asking our Allies, maybe augment our forces with theirs and some state forces Unless we want to start rapidly expanding PMCs lmao >The other general’s got a point. This isn’t just an attack on America. It’s an attack on the entire free world, and we need all hands on deck now that Baghdad has fallen. I’ll call up some of our allies.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6230632 It's like playing Hearts of Iron. You spend a few minutes paying attention to a different theater and then get the notification that your capital fell to a naval invasion while you weren't looking.
>The other general’s got a point. This isn’t just an attack on America. It’s an attack on the entire free world, and we need all hands on deck now that Baghdad has fallen. I’ll call up some of our allies. All right, fine. Call our other allies in the region like Egypt, Kuwait and Jordan and dangle some carrots like covering some of the cost of deployment to sweeten the deal if they're reluctant. A draft is politically toxic at the best of times but, with some contributions from the rest of the sandbox, mobilising the National Guard for overseas deployment should make up the numbers. And start pulling Air Force assets from all over to bomb targets thrice over.
Raven !m9m0dq2hio
>>6230632 >The other general’s got a point. This isn’t just an attack on America. It’s an attack on the entire free world, and we need all hands on deck now that Baghdad has fallen. I’ll call up some of our allies. Yeah, this has gotten a mite serious. Ring up the guys in the region, can't imagine Jordan or the Saudis are happy about this, and Europe won't like a new refugee crisis. Also, this is the Middle East, while we spin things up have the CIA and airforce drop whatever groups are fighting these bastards guns and info. Also humanitarian aid.
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
Quoted By:
>>6230820 The US is already working in conjunction with the Saudi military.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6230632 >Activate our National Guard units instead of having to put up a draft. Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6230632 >>It needs to be done. I’ll tell the general that he’ll get his 200k. The broad majority of the American public supports this war and we need to win it regardless of the political consequences. Anonymous
>>6230630 >This doesn’t hurt your current support and your chances of a term in your own right, but it doesn’t help you gain any ground either. Bullshit it doesn't we got ranked choice voting, If this interview doesn't get at least a couple people putting us second over the libertarians who wouldn't otherwise then we live in more of a clown world than normal.
Anyway
>The other general’s got a point. This isn’t just an attack on America. It’s an attack on the entire free world, and we need all hands on deck now that Baghdad has fallen. I’ll call up some of our allies. AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
Looks like you’re gonna be making a few calls. Locking in.
>>6231237 >then we live in more of a clown world than normal No comment.
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
Roll 1d20. Best of 3. DC: 5. This is less to determine whether or not America’s allies will support you and more how much they will do so.
Anonymous
Rolled 6 (1d20) >>6231247 Mans is forgetting 80% of the cabinet got torched and the U.S. is getting run by the Lorax.
>>6231256 19
TheSurvivalist !!uuJbd4m8dPS
TheSurvivalist !!uuJbd4m8dPS ID:+DRVlPvC Mon 28 Apr 2025 18:26:22 No. 6231268 Report Quoted By:
Rolled 17 (1d20) >>6231256 Anonymous
Rolled 19 (1d20) >>6231256 Anonymous
>>6231264 >>6231270 Looks like you were correct, but a bit preemptive.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6231272 With the power of FRIENDSHIP! kek
Anonymous
>>6231270 MFSA be like
We should definitely keep this apparently quite enthusiastic coalition Middle East-centric. Not getting the Europeans bogged down in yet another desert tarpit and keeping as much of it as possible within the Muslim Arab world helps avoid some nasty political landmines and makes the aftermath easier.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6231367 >"What do you mean the rest of the Arab and middle eastern nations are siding with the U.S.? Why would they do this?!" >meanwhile, the majority of the U.S. Navy parking in the med and red seas It's a real mystery.
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
“If I announce a draft, I might as well end my campaign in that same breath. Sorry general, but we’re going to need to bring some more allies into this.” Not only is it the matter of the draft, but sending the national guard into a war zone would cut what little political connections you have. “Call an emergency NATO session.” “Yes, sir.” Half of the room appears satisfied at your choice. Half of them appear disappointed. Regardless, the situation room spreads out, making calls and deliberating. It’s out of your hands now. The only thing you need to do is prepare for whatever date is chosen upon. ~ APRIL 16 2012 ~ Yesterday you and 27 other world leaders gathered together in Brussels to discuss the growing threat of the MFSA. It has become clear that continuing to wage this war alone will not end favorably for the United States. The MFSA have already expanded to nearly 200,000 militants with the Iraqi government fleeing, leaving behind only a handful of rogue divisions to fight off the terrorist organization. Most of the fellow NATO members were already waiting for you to bring them into the fold and the rest took only minor negotiating and deal-making, but by the end of the day you have the entirety of NATO backing you. You look at the numbers on the drive to the airport. The U.S. military has managed to scrape together 30,000 more troops through various means other than dipping into the National Guard or sending out a draft, bringing your nation’s manpower in Arabia to 120,000, plus the Saudi’s 10,000. Once all the logistics are complete, you are expecting another 100,000 from NATO. You outnumber Rajab al-Hai, but not by much. You will still need to rely on your technological superiority and good strategy to kill this bastard and his cause. You have another meeting scheduled later in the month for your allies in the Middle East, but for now you will have to make do with this 230,000. In the meantime, you have something else to deal with. ~ APRIL 17 2012 ~ You are back in DC. Once again, you are also back in the situation room, presiding over two dozen military and national security officials. While NATO is in the process of mobilizing their troops, munitions, vehicles and so forth halfway across the world, you are facing a different issue. One of the steps in the U.S. military’s plan to bring down the MFSA and Rajab al-Hai is to track down and eliminate the arms dealers that are supplying the organization with their weapons. After weeks of information gathering, your intelligence officials present you with the profiles of 24 individuals that are linked to the MFSA’s arms trade. The vast majority of them are located in Iraq, but there are exactly three that are said to be residing somewhere in a nearby country. (1/2)
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
Quoted By:
>>6231883 >Farzin Almasi. He is a new player in this black market, only recently popping up on any radars right before the bombing of the Capitol. What he lacks in experience, he makes up for in wealth. Officially, nobody knows the source of this wealth but the prevailing theory is that he was born into an oil dynasty and changed his name. He is currently residing somewhere in Iran, according to the file on him. (Easy) >Zaahid el-Uddin. Unlike the previous dealer mentioned, Zaahid does have the experience. Having been a known arms dealer for insurgencies, extremist groups and more since 1987, this man knows how the game is played. He is currently claimed to be located somewhere in Jordan. (Medium) >Osahar Mansour. This man is tricky. Not much is known about him except that he has been an active arms dealer in Iraq since the invasion in 2003. There is no photo of this man. No historical record. Just a trail of guns and connections that when piled together reveal that a man by this name does exist. He is rumored to be hiding somewhere in Egypt. (Hard) (2/2)
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
The people that sit in front of you in this room inform you that they lack the resources to execute an isolated takedown of any important individuals in the crippled Iraq, so that just leaves three targets. Who will you prioritize first?>Farzin Almasi. He is a new player in this black market, only recently popping up on any radars right before the bombing of the Capitol. What he lacks in experience, he makes up for in wealth. Officially, nobody knows the source of this wealth but the prevailing theory is that he was born into an oil dynasty and changed his name. He is currently residing somewhere in Iran, according to the file on him. (Easy) >Zaahid el-Uddin. Unlike the previous dealer mentioned, Zaahid does have the experience. Having been a known arms dealer for insurgencies, extremist groups and more since 1987, this man knows how the game is played. He is currently claimed to be located somewhere in Jordan. (Medium) >Osahar Mansour. This man is tricky. Not much is known about him except that he has been an active arms dealer in Iraq since the invasion in 2003. There is no photo of this man. No historical record. Just a trail of guns and connections that when piled together reveal that a man by this name does exist. He is rumored to be hiding somewhere in Egypt. (Hard) (2/2)
Anonymous
>>6231885 >>Zaahid el-Uddin. Unlike the previous dealer mentioned, Zaahid does have the experience. Having been a known arms dealer for insurgencies, extremist groups and more since 1987, this man knows how the game is played. He is currently claimed to be located somewhere in Jordan. (Medium) We could probably have a CIA spook walk up and shoot the first guy right in the face when they meet to make a "deal" if we wanted. This guy is a good place to start, then. To get the ball rolling and have some immediate effect. If we fail we can focus on the easy guy instead.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6231264 Only sane people speak for the trees!
>>6231895 I mean do keep in mind depending how we go about doing it there's a high chance it's going to cause the others to scatter, especially Mansour who I imagine is a 'either you somehow get em now or you aint getting em at all' type dude.
Regardless I don't trust our odds so
>Zaahid el-Uddin. Unlike the previous dealer mentioned, Zaahid does have the experience. Having been a known arms dealer for insurgencies, extremist groups and more since 1987, this man knows how the game is played. He is currently claimed to be located somewhere in Jordan. (Medium) Is fine with me even if it causes the others to disappear off the face of the earth.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6231895 >Zaahid el-Uddin. Unlike the previous dealer mentioned, Zaahid does have the experience. Having been a known arms dealer for insurgencies, extremist groups and more since 1987, this man knows how the game is played. He is currently claimed to be located somewhere in Jordan. (Medium) I originally wanted to go for the easy you to score a win, but if we start taking these guys out they might to to ground so better to strike fast and what will hopefully be likely.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6231885 >>Osahar Mansour. This man is tricky. Not much is known about him except that he has been an active arms dealer in Iraq since the invasion in 2003. There is no photo of this man. No historical record. Just a trail of guns and connections that when piled together reveal that a man by this name does exist. He is rumored to be hiding somewhere in Egypt. (Hard) AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
Looks like you’re sending your guys into Jordan to find Zaahid el-Uddin. Roll 3d100. Best of 3.
TheSurvivalist !!uuJbd4m8dPS
TheSurvivalist !!uuJbd4m8dPS ID:bRMSlV5Z Wed 30 Apr 2025 17:06:16 No. 6232509 Report Quoted By:
Rolled 22, 46, 79 = 147 (3d100) >>6232506 Anonymous
Quoted By:
Rolled 28, 7, 64 = 99 (3d100) >>6232506 Oh look he's right there waiting at the airport. Wow he's surrendering with no ulterior motives. Neat he says he "doesn't want to die". So convenient with this roll.
Raven !m9m0dq2hio
Rolled 42, 43, 92 = 177 (3d100) >>6232506 Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6232518 Mr President- we got hem
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
Quoted By:
You decide that your current best course of action is to primarily target Zaahid el-Uddin, who is supposedly located in Jordan. Having been a major source of arms trade for terrorist organizations since the late 80s, this is not the first time that el-Uddin has been the target of the United States military. It started in 2001 with the war in Afghanistan that Mr. Zaahid became the subject of targeted strikes. He always managed to avoid capture or assassination. This continued across four different conflicts, but you are hoping that this time will be different. He has decades of experience evading justice, but he’s never seen justice like this before. ~ APRIL 18 2012 ~ The first thing you do in the morning is get dressed, brush your teeth, and eat a quick breakfast. The second thing you do in the morning is get on the phone with the king of Jordan, Abdul Khaliq el-Hanif. “Good afternoo- well, I suppose it is morning for you.” “Yes, and good afternoon to you as well, your majesty.” “So what is it that brings you to call me on this day? What is it that could not wait until the meeting later this month?” “Well, you see…” You pause for a moment. “I’ll cut to the chase. Our military intelligence has reason to believe that an individual with connections to the MFSA is resided somewhere within Jordan.” You can hear the monarch on the other end recline into his seat. “I see. That is…not good. What manner of individual is this, exactly?” “Arms dealer. That is all I am able to disclose at this time.” More like all that you are willing to disclose. “And this arms dealer is selling weapons to the MFSA, I presume?” “You’d be correct. I’m sure you understand what it is I am asking from you.” Abdul sighs. “You wish for me to allow your men access into Jordan so that you may deal with this…person, correct?” You nod, but quickly remember you’re talking to Abdul through the phone. You feel a tinge of embarrassment “That’s mostly correct. The United States would also appreciate your aid in whatever information we might require to apprehend this individual as swiftly as possible.” “Right, of course…do you even know where this arms dealer is, though? You don’t seem very confident in their location and I can not simply allow foreign soldiers to march through my lands unless you know exactly where they will be going.” You can feel where this conversation is steering, and it is not favorable for you. “…no. No, my apologies. We don’t know where this individual is at this time.” “In that case, I cannot help you now. I am very sorry, mister President. I hope that your situation becomes more…h-how you say…favorable in the future.” “Of course. Take care, your highness.” “You as well, mister president.” (1/2)
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
The call ends. You sink into your chair, gripping your forehead and sighing in defeat. With the failed attempt at catching Rajab al-Hai still fresh in some people’s minds and practically all of Iraq being under the MFSA’s control, Operation Judgement Day is turning out for the worse. As far as major victories go, you have none to take credit for. You need something good, or otherwise the public approval for this war will continue to deteriorate. The King of Jordan may not have given you permission to execute a search operation in his country, but that doesn’t mean you can’t do it anyways. The consequences of being caught will be terrible for US-Jordan relations, but perhaps it’s worth it. On the other hand, you could just wait. Zaahid el-Uddin should still (hopefully) have no clue that there is another operation in the works yet, so maybe it’s just a matter of catching him outside of Jordan’s borders. If you can afford the time to wait, you could avoid any possible diplomatic tensions with Jordan entirely. >I’ll tell the special division to wait it out. Let’s set up some checkpoints along the Saudi-Jordan border, keep an ear open and hope that he’ll walk out of whatever hole he’s in and right into our hands. No need to risk any more trouble for me in the Middle East for one man. >Fuck it. This is terrorism we’re talking about! If the king won’t give us permission, so be it. We’re sending in the covert operation anyways. Once it’s all done and the mission is proven successful, I’ll have all the time to reprimand Abdul for harboring a man who is actively aiding terrorists. >Actually, why not just take the special division we’ve got set up and change the target? el-Uddin is not the only major arms dealer on our radar, not even the only one outside of Iraq. I’ll reconsider one of the other two (Which one? Almasi or Mansour?) >Write-in. (2/2)
TheSurvivalist !!uuJbd4m8dPS
TheSurvivalist !!uuJbd4m8dPS ID:Hf0dkjJB Fri 02 May 2025 18:10:25 No. 6233885 Report >>6233875 How helpful has the King of Jordan been with the terrorist hunt previously?
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
>>6233885 Jordan has been playing a neutral role in this conflict so far, but will be appearing in the upcoming meeting with fellow middle eastern powers to discuss joining the coalition.
TheSurvivalist !!uuJbd4m8dPS
TheSurvivalist !!uuJbd4m8dPS ID:wyMGT2K/ Fri 02 May 2025 18:53:11 No. 6233894 Report Quoted By:
>>6233890 Fuck em then. I can see the very real consequences of this but the war on terror is probably the best thing we have to run on and I’ll be damned if we let a “king” dictate to us the best course of action to bringing justice for America
>>6233875 >Fuck it. This is terrorism we’re talking about! If the king won’t give us permission, so be it. We’re sending in the covert operation anyways. Once it’s all done and the mission is proven successful, I’ll have all the time to reprimand Abdul for harboring a man who is actively aiding terrorists. If this operation fails, maybe we’ll hire some SOCOM commanders or something. We need a win.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6233875 >>Fuck it. This is terrorism we’re talking about! If the king won’t give us permission, so be it. We’re sending in the covert operation anyways. Once it’s all done and the mission is proven successful, I’ll have all the time to reprimand Abdul for harboring a man who is actively aiding terrorists. We want to remove a destabilizing element from this region and the king wants to play softball instead? Every day this arms dealer stays around he puts guns in the hands of people who would inevitably one day turn them on the people of the middle east. The king should be aware of this and want just as much as we do to remove this subversive element in his own backyard.
The dealer has got to go. He will be found. He will be removed.
Raven !m9m0dq2hio
Quoted By:
>>6233875 Now now, no sense in making enemies where we don't have to. His concerns aren't unreasonable, no country would want foreign soldiers roaming about on a 'maybe'. Certainly not worth wrecking our diplomatic ties with Jordan. We can afford to be patient.
Raven !m9m0dq2hio
Quoted By:
>>6233875 >>I’ll tell the special division to wait it out. Let’s set up some checkpoints along the Saudi-Jordan border, keep an ear open and hope that he’ll walk out of whatever hole he’s in and right into our hands. No need to risk any more trouble for me in the Middle East for one man. Lol forgot the vote. Jordan is a decently important partner in the region, it's worth throwing all that away because we got impatient.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6233875 >I’ll tell the special division to wait it out. Let’s set up some checkpoints along the Saudi-Jordan border, keep an ear open and hope that he’ll walk out of whatever hole he’s in and right into our hands. No need to risk any more trouble for me in the Middle East for one man. We do not need to go charging in for one man right now. He's not going anywhere and this is not worth tanking our relations with Jordan for. We've already had one major operational stuff-up, a second one will be a disaster.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6233875 >I’ll tell the special division to wait it out. Let’s set up some checkpoints along the Saudi-Jordan border, keep an ear open and hope that he’ll walk out of whatever hole he’s in and right into our hands. No need to risk any more trouble for me in the Middle East for one man. Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>6233875 >>I’ll tell the special division to wait it out. Let’s set up some checkpoints along the Saudi-Jordan border, keep an ear open and hope that he’ll walk out of whatever hole he’s in and right into our hands. No need to risk any more trouble for me in the Middle East for one man. AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
Quoted By:
Looks like you’ll be playing it safe. Locking in.
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
Oh, and I should also note that we’re still using the 3d100s that y’all rolled from the previous update.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Rolled 91, 25, 32 = 148 (3d100) >>6234533 But these ones are cooler
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
https://suptg.thisisnotatrueending.com/qstarchive/2025/6203031/ I have decided to end this thread here. Rest assured that once this thread dies, a new one will be posted shortly thereafter. Thank you all for playing part one of Designated Survivor Quest! If you have any feedback—positive or negative—or any questions to ask I would love to hear them. Otherwise, feel free to stay tuned for part two.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Rolled 424 (1d1776) >>6235312 God speed
TheSurvivalist !!uuJbd4m8dPS
TheSurvivalist !!uuJbd4m8dPS ID:S7eOY45V Sun 04 May 2025 20:24:26 No. 6235342 Report >>6235312 Wonderful quest you’re running. Was very disappointed by the show so to see some of the edges get polished by you has been refreshing. A very good writer as well, excited for the next thread.
AspenQM !Rt0/iy0s7I
Quoted By:
>>6235342 I very much appreciate that. I honestly don’t remember much about the show other than the basic premise, but I was definitely more inspired by the TCT mod “Democracy’s Martyrdom.”